Need Electrophoresis Equipment for your research?
Cellulose acetate electrophoresis is a type of zone electrophoresis that separates molecules in liquid form such as proteins on a membrane or stripe made of cellulose acetate. Developed by a German chemist, Joachim Kohn (1912-1987) in 1957, cellulose acetate electrophoresis was the second form of zone electrophoresis, after filter paper electrophoresis. It was also one of the earliest electrophoretic techniques adopted in clinical laboratories for routine diagnosis that is still in use to date (Rocco, 2005).
Principles of Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis
In cellulose acetate electrophoresis, a membrane or stripe made of cellulose acetate is used as a support matrix to separate components in the sample. As with typical zone electrophoresis, electrophoretic separation occurs in a homogeneous buffer system. The support matrix or medium is submerged in an electrophoresis running buffer maintained at a definite pH value, and electrophoretic separation is conducted for a definite time (Westermeier, et al., 2005).
It can provide a molecular sieving effect on electrophoretic separation of the sample, based on the size of the pores between the molecules of the support matrix. It can also reduce convection currents that are generated from excessive heat, which occurs during electrophoresis. When the separation is completed, components of the sample are isolated into distinct bands or zones. Each band represents constituents in the samples that possess similar or identical characteristics (Jorgenson, 1986; Walker, 2010).
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the set-up of cellulose acetate electrophoresis
In the case of cellulose acetate electrophoresis, membranes in the form of sheets or stripes made from cellulose acetate are saturated with the running buffer. Each end of the buffer-saturated stripes overlaps with a filter paper wick that reaches into the buffer in an electrophoresis tank (Figure 1). Samples of interest are dotted onto the surface at about half or one-third of the length of the cellulose acetate membrane (Kohn, 1969; Walker, 2010). The separation begins when an electric current is applied to each end of the stripe, which acts as an anode and cathode. At the end of the electrophoresis, separated components can be stained and unstained for visualization purposes and for further quantitative analyses (Kohn, 1962).
Cellulose acetate electrophoresis is suitable for rapid screening purposes by comparing the pattern of separation obtained from the sample of interest with that of a known reference. The technique is applicable to various types of samples, such as nucleic acids, proteins, polypeptides dyes, and mixtures of dyes and polysaccharides (Kohn, 1962; Dudman & Bishop, 1968).
Cellulose Acetate as Electrophoretic Support Matrix
Cellulose acetate is derived from the acetylation of filter papers, which are made of pure cellulose. The acetylation is generally in the C-3 and C-6 positions of the glucose ring (Rochetti & Gelfi, 2001). Cellulose acetate possesses larger pores than other popular electrophoretic matrices such as agarose and polyacrylamide (Walker, 2010). The sieving influence that cellulose acetate imposes onto the separating components, therefore, is very little or no. In fact, it can be inferred that the mobility of the components in the sample during cellulose acetate electrophoresis is largely based on the overall charge rather than the size of the component in question (Kohn, 1957; Westermeier, et al., 2005).
For this reason, the ability to distinguish different components that are very similar in size, or the resolution of a cellulose acetate electrophoresis, is rather limited, when compared to gel or capillary electrophoresis. By the same token, cellulose acetate electrophoresis, unlike other matrices, is applicable for the separation of peptides or proteins based on their isoelectric point (pI)—where the overall charge of the peptides or proteins is zero. Electrophoresis of proteins or peptides on cellulose acetate supplies similar results to those obtained from isoelectric focusing (IEF) although cellulose acetate electrophoresis is not conducted in a pH gradient.
Advantages of Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis
Cellulose acetate electrophoresis was first introduced when Kohn demonstrated its ability to separate hemoglobin, a protein in the red blood cell, and to identify abnormal hemoglobin in blood serum (Kohn, 1957 as cited in Rocco, 2005). The technique was very well-received among clinical biochemists because cellulose acetate provides several advantages over filter paper. The following highlight some of the advantages of the technique:
1. Electrophoretic separation requires a shorter time than filter paper electrophoresis
Filter paper electrophoresis, the predecessor of cellulose acetate electrophoresis, typically requires 12-14 hours for the electrophoretic separation of serum proteins, which was a major reason that electrophoresis was not fully adopted for clinical analysis (Durrum, 1950 & Rosenfeld, 1981, as cited in Rocco, 2005). With cellulose acetate electrophoresis, the separation time was reduced to less than an hour to 6 hours, depending on the samples being separated (Rocco, 2005). This allows for rapid screening that is better suited for routine analysis in clinical laboratories than filter paper electrophoresis.
2. Separation on cellulose acetate results in a sharp zone of separation
The modification of filter papers with acyl groups replaces hydroxyl (-OH) groups in the hexose rings with acyl groups (CH3CO), which leads to several changes in the property that is reflected in cellulose acetate. One apparent change in the characteristic of cellulose acetate is that it has become more hydrophobic (Mashkour et al., 2015), causing cellulose acetate to be less protein- and water-absorbent than typical filter papers. Another defining characteristic of cellulose acetate is its uniform pore size. Consequently, the bands or zones of isolated components obtained from cellulose acetate electrophoresis are sharper, with much less trailing (Walker, 2010), and the pattern of separation as such is more reproducible than the one obtained from filter paper electrophoresis (Rocco, 2005).
3. Cellulose acetate can be made transparent for downstream analysis
One major drawback of filter electrophoresis is that it is not possible to quantify the resulting separated components. Only the estimation of the relative amount or concentration of the separated components is possible. Cellulose acetate, however, can be cleared after electrophoretic separation and staining, if necessary. This is achieved either by making cellulose acetate transparent or by dissolving it with compatible solvents. For example, cellulose strips with separated protein fractions can be stained with Acid Black 2 (nigrosin) or Ponceau S and made transparent with microscopic immersion oil, acetic-ethanol mixture, or trichloroacetic acid solution. Once the background is completely transparent, the cleared stripe can be scanned on an optical densitometer for quantification. Alternatively, each band can be cut from the membrane, dissolved in a mixture of ethanol and chloroform, and the protein-dye complex, which reflects the amount of each protein fraction, can be measured using a spectrophotometer (Rocco, 2005).
4. Cellulose acetate is a ready-made support matrix
Unlike other newer matrices, cellulose acetate is a ready-made matrix which, apart from equilibration in the running buffer, does not require further modification or preparation before use. This is particularly useful in high-throughput analysis, in which one or two types of samples are repeatedly analyzed in large quantities. A ready-made matrix reduces the probability that unforeseen variations are unintentionally introduced in the set-up of the electrophoresis (Walker, 2010) and also provides the versatility to the technique. Cellulose acetate electrophoresis can be applied to a wide range of samples, provided that a suitable running buffer is available. For example, a more comprehensible separation pattern of hemoglobins can be achieved by changing a running buffer to two running buffers, one at each electrode, creating a discontinuous buffer system (Kohn, 1969). The use of a ready-made matrix also allows the integration of robotics for the analysis, making it possible to convert cellulose acetate electrophoresis to a fully automatic system (Rochetti & Gelfi, 2001).
Applications of Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis
Cellulose acetate electrophoresis is a versatile separation technique that is applicable to many analyses, especially ones in clinical laboratories. Some examples of the application of cellulose acetate electrophoresis are:
1. Serum Analysis: Hemoglobin profiling
Serum analysis, particularly the separation of normal and abnormal hemoglobins in the blood serum, was the first application of cellulose acetate electrophoresis in clinical pathology. Hemoglobins are iron-containing proteins that carry oxygen in the red blood cells. Mutations in genes encoding any of the hemoglobin subunits will result in the alteration in some characteristics of the goblin, leading to hereditary blood disorders such as sickle cell anemia, alpha- and beta-thalassemia (Forgot & Bunn, 2013).
In 1957, Kohn introduced the use of cellulose acetate as a support matrix in zone electrophoresis (Rocco, 2005), using the separation of blood serum, including hemoglobins as an example. Again, in 1969, he demonstrated the separation and identification of abnormal forms of hemoglobin using cellulose acetate electrophoresis conducted in a discontinuous buffer system (Kohn, 1969). Since then, there have been many protocols developed based on cellulose acetate electrophoresis for rapid hemoglobin profiling that can identify patients suffering from sickle cell anemia and thalassemia. Profiling requires the separation and quantification of different forms of hemoglobin (Marengo-Rowe, 1965). Nowadays, rapid hemoglobin profiling is performed by applying hemolysates onto a cellulose acetate plate, a cellulose acetate stripe on a plastic plate, and subjecting it to electrophoresis (Wild & Bain, 2004).
2. Transfer Immunoelectrophoresis (IEP) Method
The transfer immunoelectrophoresis method is an adaptation of immunoelectrophoresis (IEP) performed using an agar block as developed by Grabar and Williams in 1955 (Rocco, 2005). In IEP, serum containing antigens, which are proteins or peptides that specifically react to antibodies, are separated by gel electrophoresis. After separation, anti-serum-containing antibodies are diffused to allow the binding of antigen to its corresponding antibody, which will lead to the precipitation of antigen-antibody complex (Nowotny, 1979).
In 1957, Kohn modified Grabar and Williams’ IEP method by separating the serum-containing antigens using cellulose acetate electrophoresis. After electrophoresis, the cellulose acetate membrane is placed next to a filter paper saturated with anti-serum, to allow the diffusion onto the cellulose acetate membrane. The diffusion of anti-serum onto the cellulose acetate membrane leads to the formation of an antigen-antibody complex. Finally, the membrane can be stained, cleared, dried, and directly kept as a record of the analysis (Kohn, 1957; Rocco, 2005).
3. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis on cellulose acetate
Counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE), is an electrophoresis technique that tests for a compatible antigen-antibody interaction. In CIE, a serum is applied on one side of the medium and the sample on the other. After the application of an electric field, the serum and samples migrate to the middle and, if antibodies are present in the serum, a band representing an antigen-antibody complex, or precipitin, will be formed. Kohn demonstrated the application of cellulose acetate electrophoresis for the CIE. Similar to the transfer IEP method, the formation of an antigen-antibody complex in CIE can be stained, cleared, dried and directly kept as a record of the analysis (Rocco, 2005).
Cellulose acetate accounts for one of the earliest support matrices used for zone electrophoresis. Since its conception, there are newer forms of zone electrophoresis that offer higher resolving power without compromising separation time or results. Techniques such as gel and capillary electrophoresis have mostly replaced cellulose acetate electrophoresis in most research laboratories. Nevertheless, cellulose acetate electrophoresis still retains its place in routine clinical diagnosis due to its ease of use and adaptability.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
- Forget, B. G., & Bunn, H. F. (2013). Classification of the Disorders of Hemoglobin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 3(2), a011684–a011684. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a011684
- Jorgenson, J. W. (1986). Electrophoresis. Analytical Chemistry, 58(7), 743A-760A. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00298a001
- Kohn, J. (1969). Separation of haemoglobins on cellulose acetate. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 22(1), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.22.1.109
- Kohn, J. (1962). Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Proceedings of the Association of Clinical Biochemists, 2(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/036985646200200114
- Kohn, J. (1957). An Immuno-electrophoretic Technique. Nature, 180(4593), 986–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/180986a0
- Marengo-Rowe, A. J. (1965). Rapid electrophoresis and quantitation of haemoglobins on cellulose acetate. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 18(6), 790–792. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.18.6.790
- Mashkour, M., Afra, E., Resalati, H., & Mashkour, M. (2015). Moderate surface acetylation of nanofibrillated cellulose for the improvement of paper strength and barrier properties. RSC Advances, 5(74), 60179–60187. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA08161K
- Nowotny, A. (1979). Immunoelectrophoresis. In Basic Exercises in Immunochemistry (pp. 235–237). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67356-6_72
- Righetti, P. G., & Gelfi, C. (2001). 14. Electrophoresis. In Helmut Guenzler & A. Williams (Eds.), Handbook of Analytical Techniques (pp. 346–347). WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH.
- Rocco, R. M. (2005). Joachim Kohn (1912–1987) and the Origin of Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Clinical Chemistry, 51(10), 1896–1901. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.056572
- Walker, J. M. (2010). 10 Electrophoretic techniques. In K. Wilson & J. M. Walker (Eds.), Principles and Techniques of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (7th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Westermeier, R., Gronau, S., Becket, P., Buelles, J., Schickle, H., & Theßeling, G. (2005). Electrophoresis in Practice: A Guide to Methods and Applications of DNA and Protein Separations (4th, revised ed.). Wiley-VCH Verlag.
- Wild, B. J., & Bain, B. J. (2004). Detection and quantitation of normal and variant hemoglobins: an analytical review. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 41(5), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563041731600