Conditioned place preference chamber is a paradigm widely used to explore the reinforcing effects of natural and pharmacological stimuli

Product Description

The conditioned place preference chamber is a paradigm widely used to explore the reinforcing effects of natural and pharmacological stimuli, including drugs of addiction. Combinations of floor and wall cues are available

In this variant,  subjects are allowed to freely move between a compartment in which they were conditioned with either drug cues or neutral cues. The wall cues a (come with maze) provide visual reinforcement

This dual chamber place preference allows for biased and unbiased conditioned place preference testing. A removable door (not shown) allows isolation into one compartment of the apparatus of the animal. Preference testing is then done by removing the door to allow the mouse to freely explore between the two compartments (as seen in the image)

  • Visual pattern inserts are sandwiched between the clear interior layer and the outer grey layer. These visual pattern inserts do not interact with the mouse directly, preserving the life of the apparatus.
  • Optional Standing Inserts (visualized) is for spatial place preference procedures. Please request separately.
Request a Conditioned Place Preference

Variations

Automated shock plates can be inserted anywhere in the CPP chamber

Automated heat plates can be inserted anywhere in the CPP chamber

Automated feeders/pellet dispensors can be inserted any point in the maze

Automated lickometers can be inserted any point in the maze

Variants

RTPP_Chamber_01__00003

Real-Time Place Preference Chamber

The Real-Time Place Preference Chamber is used to explore the reinforcing effects of natural and pharmacological stimuli, including drugs of addiction.

Conditioned Place Preference Bechara 1987

Conditioned Place Preference Calcagnetti 1996

Conditioned Place Preference Suzuki 1995a

Conditioned Place Preference Bienkowski 1997b

Conditioned Place Preference Spyraki 1988 – 2

Conditioned Place Preference Isaac 1989

Conditioned Place Preference Kelsey 1989

Conditioned Place Preference Shippenberg 1988b

Conditioned Place Preference Mucha 1985

Conditioned Place Preference Gong 1995

Conditioned Place Preference Hiroi 1991a

Conditioned Place Preference Bechara 1992

Conditioned Place Preference Nadar 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Stefurak 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Parker 1995

Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Macky 1986

Conditioned Place Preference Tzschentke 1998

Conditioned Place Preference Hiroi 1991

Conditioned Place Preference Brown 1993

Effects of medial dorsal thalamic and ventral pallidal lesions on the acquisition of a conditioned place preference

Conditioned Place Preference Mcalonan 1993

Conditioned Place Preference Kelsey 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Kelsey 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Everitt 1991

Conditioned Place Preference Everitt 1991

Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1997

Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1996

Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1996

Conditioned Place Preference Martin Iverson 1985

Conditioned Place Preference Nadar 1996

Conditioned Place Preference Hemby 1992

Conditioned Place Preference Carr 1983

Conditioned Place Preference Gong 1997

Conditioned Place Preference Pierce 1990

Conditioned Place Preference Shippenberg 1995

Conditioned Place Preference Rossi 1976

Conditioned Place Preference Scala 1985

Conditioned Place Preference Spyraki 1988

Conditioned Place Preference Gong 1996

Conditioned Place Preference Jorenby 1990

Conditioned Place Preference Torrella 2004

Conditioned Place Preference Alexander 1994

Conditioned Place Preference Stapleton 1979

Conditioned Place Preference Stapleton 1979

Conditioned Place Preference Spyraki 1982

Conditioned Place Preference Shippenberg 1987

Conditioned Place Preference Shippenberg 1987

Place preference conditioning reveals the involvement of D -dopamine receptors in the motivational properties of μ- and k-opioid agonists

Conditioned Place Preference Schenk 1986

Conditioned Place Preference Nomikos 1988

Conditioned Place Preference Morency 1986

The shuttle box can be mounted on a fulcrum. with microswitch to count entries to each compartment

Conditioned Place Preference Mithani 1986

Conditioned Place Preference Lett 1988

Conditioned Place Preference Hoffman 1988

Conditioned Place Preference Hoffman 1988

Conditioned Place Preference Dymshitz 1987

Conditioned Place Preference Bardo 1984

Conditioned Place Preference Asin 1985

Conditioned Place Preference Cador 1992

Conditioned Place Preference Cador 1992

Conditioned Place Preference Leone 1987

Conditioned Place Preference Leone 1987