What is Visual Patch Testing?

Patch tests are one of the popular diagnostic tools used in clinical labs to investigate allergies.[1] Its main application includes the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (a delayed type of hypersensitivity – type IV reaction).

The test was introduced in the late 19th century, preceded by some preliminary experiments.[1] However, with technological advancements, the technique is now standardized for many allergens, concentrations, vehicles, and scoring test reactions.[1]

To verify the diagnosis, patients with allergies or contact dermatitis are reexposed to suspected allergens under controlled conditions. It’s most suitable for testing patients with arm, hand, leg, and face eczema; atopic, dermatitis, seborrhoeic, and nummular eczema; and patients with vulval disorders, chronic psoriasis, or drug reactions.[1]

Many patch tests involve chemicals present in a wide range of materials, such as lanolin, formaldehyde, leather, hair dyes, pharmaceutical items, drink, preservatives, and other additives.[2] The test is mainly helpful in cases where blood tests or skin prick testing do not work.

Further, visual patch testing evaluates the safety of preparations and chemicals that contact the skin to manufacture products based on regulatory compliance. The technique is widely helpful in recommending alternative solutions to certain medications, cosmetics, gloves, or skincare products.

Visual Patch Testing Mechanism

Visual patch testing depends on the principle of type IV (or delayed type) hypersensitivity reaction because it takes days for symptoms to develop.[3]

When our skin is exposed to an allergen, the Langerhans cells or antigen-presenting cells (APCs) engulf the substance and break it down into smaller pieces. These pieces are then presented to Major Histocompatibility Complex type two (MHC-II) molecules bound to the cell surface.[2]

Then, the APC cells move to the lymph node and present the allergen or piece of engulfed substance to a CD4+ T-cell or T-helper cell.[2] The T-cells undergo clonal expansion, with some traveling back to antigen exposure sites.

So, when the skin is exposed to the antigen again, the memory T cells recognize it and produce cytokines (chemical signals), which trigger the migration of new T cells. This initiates a cascade of immune reactions, causing symptoms like itching, inflammation, and rash in a small area.[2]

Procedure for Visual Patch Testing

The results from patch tests depend on several factors, including test material, system, functional and biological status of the test person, conditions in which the test is done, and the dermatologist performing the test.[4]

  • Wash, dry, and clean the area of skin where you need to perform the patch test.
  • Apply a small amount of the testing substance to your upper arm (at the crook of the elbow).[4]
  • Cover the area with a bandage.
  • Leave the patch test in place and do not disturb it for the next 24 hours. Also, ensure that the area or patch doesn’t get wet during this period.
  • If the patient is sensitive to any applied testing substances, they will show reactions like burning, itching, reddening, or any other irritation within 24 hours.[4]
  • Ask the patient to remove the bandage and wash the area with soap and water when the reaction or irritation starts.
  • If no reactions or irritations occur, the patient can safely use those substances or materials.[4]

Result Interpretation of Patch Testing

The test reading is done on days 3, 4, and 7,[5] and results are interpreted based on the visuals.

For example:

  • Discrete patchy erythema is present without infiltration, then it’s predicted due to an irritant reaction.[5]
  • Coalescing vesicles and ulcerative reactions show extremely positive results
  • The presence of erythema, infiltration, discrete vesicles and papules shows a strong positive reaction.
  • Erythema, infiltration, and papules indicate weak positive reactions.
  • Faint macular, homogeneous erythema and absence of infiltration indicate a doubtful reaction.[5]

Result interpretation is most difficult as false-positive reactions can also occur when there are no true allergic reactions. The causes can be:[6]

  • Impurities present in the test preparation
  • Irritating vehicle
  • The reaction generated due to adhesive
  • Lack of proper dilution of the antigen in the vehicle
  • Inadequate antigen penetration
  • Inactive or degraded allergen
  • Lost or wet test

Type of Patch Test Systems

Patch test systems are of two types: the original that requires allergens, tapes, and patches, and ready-to-use systems that only require removing the covering material.[1]

1. Allergen-Patch-Tape (Original System)

This system consists of four essential components:[1]


The allergen involved in patch tests should be pure and chemically defined. The test preparation comes in a bottle of inert materials and a plastic syringe to prevent their degradation or any chemical changes due to environmental factors, such as light, air, and humidity.[1]


Different kinds of patch chambers are available for different purposes. In some, the test areas are circular, which is most suitable for allergic reactions, while in others, it’s 10 mm square, which is preferred to distinguish irritants from an allergic reaction. Further, these patches also differ based on their sizes.[1] For example, larger chambers are for detecting weak sensitization to contact allergens.

Different types of patch chambers used in visual patch testing

Figure: Different types of Patch chambers used in Visual Patch Testing.[7]


Vehicles carry allergens, and there are different types based on the type of allergen – one is not optimal for all allergens. Petrolatum is the most commonly used vehicle, as it’s inexpensive and stabilizes the allergen.[1]

However, the reliability of the vehicle becomes the question. Liquid vehicles, such as water and organic solvents (ethanol, acetone, and methyl ethyl ketone) are better for skin penetration. The drawback is that the solvents do not favor the exact dose as they evaporate.[1]

Thus, they are mainly used in research projects or to test the materials brought by patients. Some other vehicles are anionic detergents, salicylic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide, and DMSO.[7]


They are high-adhesive moisture-resistant covers used to secure the patch test in place. Examples include colophony-based and acrylate-based adhesive tapes (such as Scanpor).[1] Use reinforcing tapes if loss of the patch is expected due to sweating or high humidity.

2. Ready-To-Use

In this system, all necessary materials are prepared in advance and the doctor or researcher only needs to peel off the covering material, apply the test strips, and mark the location. In such systems, patches are generally 9 mm square and allergens are incorporated in hydrophilic gels.[1] The test is simple, reliable, and quick to perform.

Ready-to-use visual patch test package

Figure: (a) Ready-to-use test package; and (b) Ready-to-use Patch test on the back of the patient.[7]

Benefits and Limitations of Visual Patch Testing


  • It’s a quick cost-effective test that provides reliable, accurate, and effective results.
  • Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is correctly diagnosed, identified, and managed by avoiding the allergens responsible.[8]
  • The disease severity index significantly reduces from pre- to post-diagnosis with patch testing compared to cases managed without the patch test.
  • A variety of indications have been demonstrated for patch testing, and it has improved the quality of life of dermatitis patients.[8]


  • Don’t ignore the storage recommendation of the supplier lest there’s a risk of contact allergies due to product degradation or impurities present.[1]
  • Patients with severe allergic reactions, generalized active dermatitis, or extensive eczema cannot undergo patch testing.[8]
  • A series of multiple false positive patch test reactions can occur in the presence of two or more strong positive reactions.
  • Patch testing can give rise to skin syndrome, active sensitization, and anaphylactic reactions on certain occasions.[8]
  • Patch testing may cause cutaneous complications, e.g., irritable dermatitis under the adhesive patch portion, sarcoid reactions, or bacterial and viral infections.
  • Some allergens if placed beside each other can initiate a new reaction and give false positive results. Thus, one needs to ensure the positioning of the allergens in patch testing.[8]


Visual patch testing is a commonly used method to diagnose people with contact allergies. It’s also for testing the production of certain cosmetic and skin care products under compliance. During the test, patients are reexposed to different types of allergens in a small area of their body under controlled conditions. The testing is of two types based on easiness: allergen-patch-tape and ready-to-use systems.

The advantage of visual patch testing is that it’s easier, cheaper, and quicker, and it also offers a reliable and accurate diagnosis of contact allergies like dermatitis. However, there’s a risk of false-positive results, mainly occurring if two allergies (kept adjacent and close to each other) initiate a unique reaction.

Check out our high-quality visual patching chambers now if you need one that produces reliable and precise results!


  1. Wahlberg, J. E. (2001). Patch Testing. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 435–468. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_21
  2. Patch test. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_test
  3. Type IV hypersensitivity. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_IV_hypersensitivity
  4. How To Do A Simple Allergy Patch Test (2015). Retrieved from https://www.chagrinvalleysoapandsalve.com/blog/posts/how-to-do-a-simple-allergy-patch-test/
  5. Interpretation of patch test results. Retrieved from https://www.chemotechnique.se/patch-testing/interpretation-/
  6. Lazzarini, R., Duarte, I., & Ferreira, A. L. (2013). Patch tests. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 88(6), 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132323
  7. Patch Testing. Retrieved from http://eknygos.lsmuni.lt/springer/99/365-390.pdf
  8. Garg, V., Brod, B., & Gaspari, A. A. (2021). Patch testing: Uses, systems, risks/benefits, and its role in managing the patient with contact dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology, 39(4), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.03.005