ToolsConductScience tool
Analytical ChemistryFree in-browser calculator

ICH Q2(R2) LOD/LOQ Calculator.

Validate analytical method linearity, calculate LOD and LOQ per ICH Q2(R2) guidelines. Assess precision (%RSD) and accuracy (% recovery). Data never leaves your browser.

PrivateData stays in your browser
LiveNo sign-up required
Open methodFormula shown on this page
CitableMethods and citation included

Calculator

Results update in place

Try it out

Load example ICH Q2 calibration data to see the full workflow

Calibration Data

Paste tab or comma-separated data. First column = concentration, second = response. Replicates at the same concentration are grouped automatically.

Accuracy / Recovery Data (Optional)

Paste expected and measured values (spike-and-recovery). First column = expected, second = measured.

When to use

  • Validate linearity of HPLC, GC, UV-Vis, or other analytical calibration curves
  • Calculate LOD and LOQ per ICH Q2(R2) from calibration regression residuals
  • Assess repeatability precision (%RSD) at each concentration level
  • Evaluate accuracy via % recovery at QC levels
  • Generate validation summary reports for regulatory submissions

Do not use for

  • Bioassay calibration (ELISA, cell-based) — use the ELISA Curve Fitter for 4PL/5PL nonlinear fits
  • Signal-to-noise LOD — requires raw chromatographic data, not supported here
  • Stability testing — ICH Q1A is a separate guideline

LOD/LOQ from regression can underestimate true limits

The calibration-based method assumes homoscedastic residuals. If your method shows heteroscedastic error (variance increases with concentration), consider weighted regression or use the blank-based method for more conservative LOD/LOQ estimates.

R² alone does not prove linearity

A high R2\text{R}^{2} can mask systematic curvature. Always inspect the residual plot for patterns. Random scatter around zero indicates good linearity; a U-shape or S-shape indicates nonlinearity even with R2\text{R}^{2} > 0.999.

Include zero concentration in calibration

Blank responses (0 concentration) anchor the intercept and improve LOD/LOQ estimates. Without blanks, the intercept is extrapolated, which increases uncertainty.

%RSD is unreliable near zero

At very low concentrations, the mean approaches zero and %RSD becomes artificially large. Evaluate precision at LOQ separately with wider acceptance criteria (%RSD ≤\leq 10%).

1

Method

OLS linear regression on calibration data (all replicates). LOD = 3.3σ/S, LOQ = 10σ/S where σ\sigma = residual standard deviation (ICH Q2 calibration method). Precision as %RSD, accuracy as % recovery.

2

Published

Published 2026-04-05. Calculations support planning and documentation; verify procurement decisions against manufacturer specifications or institutional SOPs.

3

How to cite

How to Cite

ConductScience ICH Q2(R2) LOD/LOQ Calculator. ConductScience, Inc. 2026. Available at: https://conductscience.com/tools/lod-loq-calculator

ICH Expert Working Group. Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. 2023.

ICH Q2(R2) Method Validation Framework

ICH Q2(R2) defines the analytical parameters that must be validated for any quantitative method:

• Specificity: Method measures only the intended analyte • Linearity: Response is proportional to concentration (R2\text{R}^{2} ≥\geq 0.999) • Range: Validated from LOQ to the highest linear concentration • Accuracy: % recovery at multiple levels (spike-and-recovery) • Precision: Repeatability (%RSD) and intermediate precision • LOD/LOQ: Sensitivity limits based on calibration statistics

This tool automates linearity, LOD/LOQ, precision, and accuracy assessment from calibration and QC data.

LOD and LOQ Calculation Methods

Three approaches exist for LOD/LOQ determination:

1. Signal-to-Noise (S/N): LOD at S/N = 3, LOQ at S/N = 10. Requires access to chromatographic noise.
2. Based on Calibration: LOD = 3.3σ/S, LOQ = 10σ/S. σ\sigma = residual standard deviation of the regression. This is the method used here.
3. Based on Blank: LOD = mean_blank + 3.3 ×\times SD_blank. Requires replicate blank measurements.

The calibration-based method is most commonly used because it requires only the calibration data that you already have.

Frequently asked

325
Free tools
1,200+
Institutions
100%
Client-side
0
Uploads required