ToolsConductScience tool
MicrofluidicsFree in-browser calculator

Microfluidic Pressure Drop & Flow Planner.

Compute hydraulic resistance, pressure drop, and Reynolds number for tubing or chip channels. Get a pump class recommendation before you plumb the rig. Free. Client-side.

PrivateData stays in your browser
LiveNo sign-up required
Validated2026-04-07
CitableMethods and citation included

Calculator

Results update in place

Try it out

Load example microfluidic pressure drop calculator data to see the full workflow

When to use

  • Sizing tubing before ordering for a new microfluidic rig
  • Checking whether an existing syringe pump can drive a new chip
  • Comparing two candidate tubing IDs for the same rig
  • Computing ΔP for viscous fluids (glycerol, blood, polymer solutions)
  • Documenting expected operating pressure in an SOP or methods section

Do not use for

  • For turbulent flow (Re > 2000) — Hagen-Poiseuille breaks down
  • For gas-phase or compressible-fluid systems
  • For chips with internal valving or variable cross-sections (treat each segment)
  • For non-Newtonian fluids where viscosity depends on shear rate (whole blood at high shear, some polymer solutions)

Resistance scales with r⁴

Halving the tubing ID multiplies resistance by 16×. The biggest single driver of ΔP in any microfluidic system is the narrowest segment — usually the chip channel itself.

Series resistance adds; parallel resistance combines like resistors

Tubing → connector → chip → tubing → outlet: sum the Rs. Parallel channels on a single chip: use 1/Rtotal = Σ 1/Ri. Compute each geometry separately and combine.

Pump specs are optimistic

A syringe pump rated "up to 200 mbar" usually means "can generate 200 mbar against a blocked outlet". In practice, derate by 2× — plan your rig for half the rated pressure as a safety margin.

Rectangular formula is an approximation

The Bahrami formula is accurate within ~3% for h/w < 0.5 and within ~10% for square channels. For critical work use the full Fourier series solution.

1

Method

Hagen-Poiseuille for circular channels: R = 8μL/(πr4\text{r}^{4}). Rectangular channels: Bahrami low-aspect-ratio approximation R = 12μL/[wh3\text{wh}^{3}(1 − 0.63 h/w)]. Wall shear stress: τ = 6μQ/(wh2\text{wh}^{2}) (rectangular) or τ = 4μQ/(πr3\text{r}^{3}) (circular). Tubing resistance computed as series resistance and added to channel resistance for total system ΔP. Reynolds number from ρvD/μ (circular) or using hydraulic diameter D_h = 2wh/(w+h) (rectangular). Pump class thresholds: <100 mbar syringe, 100–1000 mbar low-pressure controller, >1000 mbar high-pressure controller. Temperature-dependent water viscosity from NIST REFPROP.

2

Validated

Last validated 2026-04-07. Calculations are designed for planning and documentation support; verify procurement decisions against manufacturer specifications or institutional SOPs.

3

How to cite

How to Cite

ConductScience Microfluidic Pressure Drop & Flow Planner (v2.0.0). ConductScience, Inc. 2026. Available at: https://conductscience.com/tools/microfluidic-pressure-drop-calculator

Why Pressure Drop Matters

Every microfluidic pump has a maximum pressure rating. If the ΔP your rig demands exceeds what the pump can deliver, the actual flow rate will be lower than the setpoint — sometimes dramatically lower, sometimes zero. This is the single most common source of "my flow rate is wrong" problems in microfluidics.

Syringe pumps typically deliver 100–200 mbar of driving pressure before stalling. Pressure-driven controllers like Fluigent and Elveflow go to 1–2 bar routinely. Specialty high-pressure systems (HPLC-style) reach 10+ bar.

Before ordering tubing, compute ΔP. If it lands above your pump's rating, shorten the tubing, go to a larger ID, or switch fluids.

The Fourth-Power Trap

Hagen-Poiseuille resistance scales as 1/r4\text{r}^{4}. This is the single most counterintuitive fact in microfluidics.

Cutting your tubing ID in half multiplies ΔP by 16. Going from 1 mm ID to 0.5 mm ID turns a 50 mbar system into an 800 mbar system at the same flow rate. Many labs discover this the hard way when they "upgrade" to narrower tubing to reduce dead volume and find the pump can no longer drive the flow.

Rule of thumb: use the widest ID you can tolerate for your dead-volume budget. Narrow tubing is a last resort, not a first choice.

Viscosity Dominates at Low Re

In the laminar regime (Re < 2000), ΔP scales linearly with viscosity and linearly with flow rate. Switching from water (1 mPa·s) to 50% glycerol (6 mPa·s) multiplies ΔP by 6× — same tubing, same flow rate.

Temperature also matters: water at 37 °C is 31% less viscous than at 20 °C, so running a cell-culture perfusion at body temperature cuts pump load meaningfully compared to room-temperature benchmarks.

For viscous fluids (glycerol, blood, polymer solutions, protein stocks), pick a wider tubing ID or reduce flow rate. For watery buffers, you have more margin.

Frequently asked

325
Free tools
1,200+
Institutions
100%
Client-side
0
Uploads required