zenodoopen
Figure 212 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 212 Morphology of Cojoba clade A–CCojoba arborea (L.) Britton & Rose A habit B leaves C fruit DCojoba graciliflora (S.F. Blake) Britton & Rose in Mexico, fruit E–GHesperalbizia occidentalis (Brandegee) Barneby & J.W. Grimes E habit F trunk G leaves and fruits HLysiloma candidum Brandegee, habit lLysiloma acapulcense (Kunth) Benth. fruit J–NLysiloma latisiliquum (L.) Benth. J habit K trunk L leaves and stipule M flowers N fruit O, PLysiloma tergeminum Benth., fruits. Photo credits A–C GA Romero González D, J–N R Duno de Stefano E–I, O, P CE Hughes.
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0