Skip to main content
FY2026 methods

How ScienceDex Rankings Are Built

A transparent record of the public NIH data sources, standardization rules, ranking computations, and known limitations behind ScienceDex.

Primary data source

NIH RePORTER

Ranking scope

6 data views

Current release

FY2026

1. Data Sources

ScienceDex is built from official NIH public award data. Current-year data comes from the NIH RePORTER API v2, which exposes project numbers, award amounts, fiscal years, principal investigators, institutions, department codes, and related award metadata.

Historical records are reconciled against NIH ExPORTER bulk files where flat-file downloads are better suited for reproducible, multi-year analysis.

Data freshness notice

ScienceDex currently displays FY2026 NIH award data. This release matched NIH RePORTER's current fiscal year when checked on 2026-07-13. Check NIH RePORTER.

Included award data

  • Extramural NIH grant mechanisms, including R, P, U, K, T, and F series awards.
  • Subcontract records returned by NIH RePORTER, attributed to the performing institution.
  • R&D contracts in all-institution rankings only, where contract scale is informative.
  • Intramural NIH research program funding is excluded because it is not reported as extramural grants.

2. Processing Pipeline

  1. 1

    Ingest public NIH records

    Fetch award records from NIH RePORTER API v2 and ExPORTER bulk files, then publish a versioned fiscal-year snapshot. The displayed release remains fixed until the ingestion and ranking refresh completes.

  2. 2

    Deduplicate awards

    Group project records by project number and fiscal year, then sum award amounts across related subprojects when needed.

  3. 3

    Normalize institutions

    Apply curated alias mappings so name variants, campus labels, and renamed entities roll up to canonical institution records.

  4. 4

    Classify departments

    Map NIH IMPAC II department codes into 27 standard basic-science and clinical-science department categories.

  5. 5

    Aggregate and rank

    Sum qualifying award dollars by ranking type, sort descending, and use grant count and investigator count as deterministic tie-breakers.

  6. 6

    Publish indexed profiles

    Store ranking tables and profile data for institution, medical-school, department, investigator, geographic, and discipline pages.

3. Institution Standardization

NIH records often contain multiple names for the same organization. A single university can appear under campus names, hospital affiliates, old legal names, abbreviations, or medical-school labels. ScienceDex applies curated alias mappings so records roll up to a canonical institution before ranking.

NIH record patternCanonical handling
Renamed schools or legacy namesMapped to the current institution name.
Campus-specific naming variantsRolled up when they represent one integrated institution.
Teaching hospitals and affiliatesHandled according to the ranking view and affiliation rules.

4. Department Classification

Department rankings use NIH department codes and map them into 27 standard medical department categories. The taxonomy separates basic-science departments from clinical departments so users can compare similar research areas across schools.

Basic science

  • Anatomy and Cell Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Genetics
  • Microbiology and Immunology
  • Neurosciences
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology

Clinical science

  • Anesthesiology
  • Dermatology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Internal Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Pediatrics
  • Psychiatry
  • Radiology
  • Surgery
  • Urology

Representative list. The full classification covers 19 clinical departments.

5. Ranking Computation

ScienceDex ranks by simple summation instead of hidden weighting. The goal is for a researcher, administrator, or vendor to understand exactly why one record appears above another.

Primary metricTotal NIH award dollars for the selected fiscal year.
Sort orderDescending by total funding.
Tie-breakingGrant count first, then investigator count.
WeightingNo weighting by award type, institution size, or discipline.
InflationDollar figures are nominal and are not inflation-adjusted.
Fiscal yearRankings are computed per NIH fiscal year, not multi-year averages.

6. Ranking Views

7. NIH Portfolio and SHARE Methods

ScienceDex extends the transparent ranking tradition used by independent NIH funding tables such as the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. ScienceDex publishes its own cohort rules, source snapshots, metric versions, coverage, and release identifiers so each result can be inspected and reproduced.

Funding portfolioAn award belongs to every NIH institute or center with a recorded funding contribution. Funding totals use that institute or center's contribution, not the full award amount.
Administered portfolioAn award belongs to the institute or center that administers it. Totals use the full award amount and are labeled separately from funding-contribution totals.
Canonical scientistsEach scientist has one ScienceDex page. Institute rankings link to that common record and carry portfolio context in filters, never in a second identity.
Researcher SHARE ScoreThe release-defined mean SHARE Score across the researcher's eligible scored datasets. It is imported from a pinned ShareScore release and remains separate from S-Index and S-Impact.
S-IndexThe largest k for which the researcher has k eligible datasets scoring at least k under the named ShareScore release definition.
S-ImpactThe citation total recorded in the named outcome snapshot for the datasets in that release's S-Index core. A core-score total is not treated as S-Impact.
Scientist matchingVerified identifiers and strong evidence matches enter official ranks. The strongest plausible candidate may be shown as a provisional match, with scores clearly labeled as provisional and excluded from official ranks and aggregates.
Portfolio-linked SHAREIncludes only datasets reached through an accepted award to publication to dataset evidence chain. The denominator and linkage coverage are displayed with the score.
Missing evidenceUnmatched identities, unlinked outputs, and insufficient dataset coverage remain unavailable. ScienceDex does not convert missing evidence into a zero.
Ranking and tiesRows sort by the selected metric, then metric-specific evidence count, portfolio funding, and stable canonical name or ID. Coverage thresholds can suppress a rank while leaving an observed value visible.

Every published portfolio table and CSV identifies the NIH snapshot, fiscal year, membership rule, analysis release, SHARE release when applicable, and metric definition version. A new release never silently rewrites an older published result.

8. Known Limitations

  • Subcontracts: NIH subcontract records can make multi-site awards appear in both prime and subcontract contexts.
  • Timing: NIH records can be corrected after publication, so rankings represent the data snapshot used for the release.
  • Department codes: Awards without department codes remain in institution and investigator views but cannot be attributed to a department ranking.
  • Multi-PI awards: Awards are attributed from NIH award metadata. Each named PI is linked to the full award amount, so investigator totals and PI-award assignment counts exceed unique-award totals. They should not be read as the investigator's personal funding share.
  • Nominal dollars: Historical funding is shown in reported dollars, not inflation-adjusted dollars.

9. Reproducibility

ScienceDex methods are designed to be inspectable from this page: data sources, normalization rules, ranking computations, and limitations are documented together so users can understand how each ranking view is produced.

This Methods page is maintained alongside the ConductScience ScienceDex integration. Current displayed rankings use FY2026 data.