Figure 3 in Fishers' perceptions of river resources: case study of French Guiana native populations using contextual cognitive mapping

Figure 3. – Overview of the cognitive maps of fishers' statements. "Fish resource and environment" received 8 edges (incoming arrows), of which 7 were threats, in 4 broad categories: gold mining, demographic, preservation, and fishing practices. The width of each edge is pro- portional to the number of cognitive maps where this statement appears. Zero label (for example in the [0, -1] between "Number of villagers" and "Fish resource") means that there is no influence between the two concepts, while an empty one ([,-3] between "Fish migration" and "Fish resource") means that nobody talked about it.