Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Tab. 1 in Microhabitat selection of the Western green lizard Lacerta bilineata

<p>Tab. 1 - Correlation matrix (Spearman coefficients) among habitat variables measured at 122 sampling points. Bold values indicate significant correlation at P&lt;0.05. / Matrice di correlazione (<i>Spearman coefficients</i>) tra le variabili di habitat misurate in 122 punti di campionamento. I valori in grassetto indicano una correlazione significativa a P&lt;0.05. Variables: Rocks (percentage cover of rocks), Bsoil (percentage cover of bare soil), Grass (percentage cover of grass), Litter (percentage cover of litter), ShrubC (percentage cover of shrub layer), ShrubH (shrub minimum height &ndash; cm), HerbC (percentage cover of herbaceous layer), HerbH (herbaceous minimum height &ndash; cm), TreeC (percentage cover of tree layer). / Variabili: Rocks (percentuale di copertura delle rocce), Bsoil (percentuale di copertura del suolo nudo), Grass (percentuale di copertura delle piante erbacee), Litter (percentuale di copertura della lettiera), ShrubC (percentuale di copertura dello strato arbustivo), ShrubH (altezza minima degli arbusti &ndash; cm), HerbC (percentuale di copertura dello strato erbaceo), HerbH (altezza minima dello strato erbaceo &ndash; cm), TreeC (percentuale di copertura dello strato arboreo).</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th><b>Bsoil</b></th><th><b>Grass</b></th><th><b>Litter</b></th><th><b>ShrubC</b></th><th><b>ShrubH</b></th><th><b>HerbC</b></th><th><b>HerbH</b></th><th><b>TreeC</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Rocks</th><td>-0.005</td><td>0.001</td><td><b>-0.286</b></td><td>0.169</td><td>-0.006</td><td>-0.031</td><td>-0.022</td><td><b>-0.404</b></td></tr><tr><th>Bsoil</th><td></td><td><b>-0.415</b></td><td><b>-0.295</b></td><td>-0.142</td><td>-0.165</td><td>-0.052</td><td>-0.081</td><td><b>-0.203</b></td></tr><tr><th>Grass</th><td></td><td></td><td><b>-0.624</b></td><td><b>-0.297</b></td><td>-0.162</td><td>0.059</td><td>0.087</td><td>-0.134</td></tr><tr><th>Litter</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>0.273</b></td><td><b>0.282</b></td><td>-0.013</td><td>-0.018</td><td><b>0.427</b></td></tr><tr><th>ShrubC</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>0.617</b></td><td><b>-0.431</b></td><td><b>-0.363</b></td><td>0.074</td></tr><tr><th>ShrubH</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>-0.188</b></td><td>-0.160</td><td>0.146</td></tr><tr><th>HerbC</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>0.908</b></td><td>-0.088</td></tr><tr><th>HerbH</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>-0.059</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics