FIGURE 2 in Reconstruction Of Stem Species Pattern As A Strategy Towards Integrated Phylogenetic Systematics And Taxonomy, Applied To Early-Derivative Poronota (Oribatida)
FIGURE 2: (a) – Habitus of an achipteriid nymph with plicate integument; (b-o) – different types of the lamellar complex: (b) – short basal type of a lamellar complex of Poronota, schematic; (c) – enlarged type, schematic; (d) – basal type in Austrachipteria, A. grandis; (e) – Achipteria type; (f) – Cerachipteria type; (g) – Oribatella reticulata, with translamella; (h) – Oribatella quadricornuta, with median dens; (i) – Anachipteria sacculifera; (k) – Unduloribates undulatus; (l) – Propelops canadensis; (m) – Peloptulus type; (n) – Eupelops type; (o) – Tegoribates type. (a: after Seniczak 1977; d: after Hammer 1967; i: after Root et al. 2008; l: after Norton and Behan-Pelletier 1986; f-h, k, m-o: after Weigmann 2006)
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0