Figure 9 in Phylogeny of the gastropod superfamily Cerithioidea using morphology and molecules
Figure 9. Comparative performance of parsimony (Par) and Bayesian (Bay) methods of inference in returning monophyletic clades of cerithioideans in analyses of the morphological partition (Morph), the extended 16S data set (Split 16S), the extended 28S data set (Split 28S), the extended 16S + 28S data sets combined (Split Mol) and with unconserved regions removed (Split Mol G), and the combined morphological and pruned molecular data sets (Morph Mol) and with unconserved regions removed (Morph Mol G). Black indicates monophyly, grey indicates nonmonophyly, white indicates not applicable. Abbreviations: Cerith, Cerithioidea; Pachy, Pachychilidae; Bat, Batillariidae; Turr, Turritellidae; Plan, Planaxidae; Cer, Cerithiidae; Sca, Scaliolidae; Pot, Potamididae; Pal, Paludomidae; Thi, Thiaridae; Mel, Melanopsidae; Pleur, Pleuroceridae; Sem, Semisulcospiridae; Group 1, Batillariidae, Cerithiidae, Dialidae, Diastomatidae, Litiopidae, Planaxidae, Siliquariidae, Turritellidae; Group 2, Modulidae, Paludomidae, Potamididae, Scaliolidae, Thiaridae; Group 3, Melanopsidae, Pleuroceridae, Semisulcospiridae. Note that taxon sampling is not identical, so that the composition of Groups 1, 2, and 3 may differ slightly.
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0