Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Comparison results of FAIR Evaluation tools

<p>We studied&nbsp;and compared&nbsp;three automated FAIRness evaluation tools namely F-UJI, the FAIR Evaluator, and FAIR Checker&nbsp;examining&nbsp;three aspects: 1) tool characteristics, 2) the evaluation metrics, and 3) metrics tests for three public datasets. We find significant differences in the evaluation results for tested resources, along with differences in the design, implementation, and documentation of the evaluation metrics and platforms.</p> <p>This data is the comparison results we summarized from the study. All results are reported in our manuscript.&nbsp;This&nbsp;data is the supplementary material of the manuscript.&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

44/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
8
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4

Topics