Figure 4 in Genome-level analyses resolve an ancient lineage of symbiotic ascomycetes
Figure 4. PCAs based on the 115 genomes used in Figure 1, both with and without phylogenetic correction (Aand B) Data based on all major CAZyme classes and carbohydrate-binding modules. Ancestral reconstructed nodes are shown as red dots (AD+LLE, L+LE, MRCA Lichinomycetes; see text). Eurotiomycetes and Lecanoromycetes are colored as green and yellow, respectively, to highlight differences between those two classes and Lichinomycetes (blue); genomes from all other classes shown in grey.Related to Figure S1 and Data S1O. (C and D) Data based on BGCs, analyzed as four groups (the three most abundant types: NRPS, NRPS-like, type-1 PKS, plus all others as one category). Orbiliomycetes and Pezizomycetes are shown in pink and orange, respectively, to highlight clustering trends compared to Lichinomycetes (in blue); genomes from all other classes shown in grey. Related to Data S1P and S2F. (E and F) PCAs based on Pfams. Only Pfams were included which had a standard deviation>1 based on raw per genome counts averaged across all annotated genomes. Eurotiomycetes and Lecanoromycetes are colored as green and yellow, respectively, to highlight differences between those two classes and Lichinomycetes (blue); genomes from all other classes shown in grey.
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0