Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
454
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
454 results for “Alien species”
Dataset for: Differential responses to fertilization and competition among invasive, non-invasive alien and native Bidens species
<p class="manuscript">Comparative studies of invasive, non-invasive alien, and native congenic plant species can identify plant traits that drive invasiveness. In particular, functional traits associated with rapid growth rate and high fecundity likely facilitate invasive success. As such traits often exhibit high phenotypic plasticity, characterizing plastic responses to anthropogenic environmental changes such as eutrophication and disturbance is important for predicting the invasive success of alien plant species in the future. Here, we compared trait expression and phenotypic plasticity at the species level among invasive, non-invasive alien, and native <i>Bidens</i> species. Plants were grown under nutrient addition and competition treatments, and their functional, morphological, and seed traits were examined. Invasive <i>B. frondosa</i> exhibited higher phenotypic plasticity in most measured traits than did the alien non-invasive <i>B. pilosa</i> or native <i>B. bipinnata</i>. However, differential plastic responses to environmental treatments rarely altered the rank of trait values among the three <i>Bidens</i> species, except for the number of inflorescences. The achene size of <i>B. frondosa</i> was larger, but its pappus length was shorter than that of <i>B. pilosa</i>. Two species demonstrated opposite plastic responses of pappus length to fertilization. These results suggest that the plasticity of functional traits does not significantly contribute to the invasive success of <i>B. frondosa</i>. The dispersal efficiency of <i>B. frondosa</i> is expected to be lower than that of <i>B. pilosa</i>, suggesting that long-distance dispersal is likely not a critical factor in determining invasive success.</p>
Supplementary material 2 from: Muñoz-Mas R, Carrete M, Castro-Díez P, Delibes-Mateos M, Jaques JA, López-Darias M, Nogales M, Pino J, Traveset A, Turon X, Vilà M, García-Berthou E (2021) Management of invasive alien species in Spain: a bibliometric review. NeoBiota 70: 123-150. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.70.68202
Table S1. Table of features, categories and definitions used to characterise the compiled literature
Prioritizing terrestrial invasive alien plant species for management in urban ecosystems
<p>1. Invasive alien plant species (IAPs) in urban areas can have detrimental effects on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Urban areas are complex social management mosaics with high land-use diversity, complex land tenure patterns, and many different stakeholder groups, some of which derive benefits from invading species. Urban conservation practitioners face complex decisions about which IAPs require management. Yet most IAPs prioritization frameworks have been designed for and implemented in natural or rural areas and are generally inadequate for guiding effective and sustainable interventions in urbanized areas.</p> <p>2. We modified an existing prioritization scheme to develop a framework for prioritizing terrestrial IAPs in urban areas which applies evidence-based (data-driven) and stakeholder-based (local knowledge) assessments to score and rank alien plant species in terms of their priority for management using an objective set of criteria.</p> <p>3. The framework consists of forty-six criteria, grouped into eight modules which assess invasion status, habitat requirements, biological characteristics, dispersal ability, distribution, impact (positive and negative), and potential for control for each alien plant species under consideration.</p> <p>4. We use the city of Toronto, Canada as a case study to test our framework – a list of 50 IAPs were effectively scored and ranked in order of high to low priority for control. Species with the highest <i>total prioritization scores</i> were <i>Vincetoxicum</i> <i>rossicum</i> (Dog Strangling Vine), <i>Convolvulus</i> <i>arvensis</i> (Field Bindweed) and <i>Taraxacum</i> <i>officinale</i> (Common Dandelion) (ranked 1, 2 and 3, respectively).</p> <p>5. Many of the identified high priority species align with the those previously flagged as of management concern by conservation practitioners, but also include those that are not actively managed due to their perceived lower ecological impacts. These species still require high resource investment for other objectives such as aesthetics. This highlights the complexity of alien plant species management in urban areas.</p> <p>6.<i> Synthesis and applications. </i>Prioritizing invasive alien plants for management in urban areas is particularly challenging due to often conflicting ecological, economic, and social objectives. We use available evidence and local stakeholder knowledge to develop an objective and systematic prioritization tool which can assist conservation practitioners in selecting priority species for management action in complex urban landscapes.</p>
Alien species checklists - occurrence tables
<p>Tables representing species-regions occurrences based on alien species databases. The tables were modified from the original sources to standardise the for the workflow, and to incorporate the taxonomic harmosation.</p> <p>1- Final_checklist_amphibians - created based on the information available in "Capinha, C. <em>et al.</em> Diversity, biogeography and the global flows of alien amphibians and reptiles. <em>Divers Distrib</em> <strong>23</strong>, 1313–1322 (2017)."</p> <p>2- Final_checklist_ants - created based on the information available in "Guénard, B., Weiser, M. D., Gómez, K., Narula, N. & Economo, E. P. The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). <em>Myrmecological News</em> <strong>24</strong>, 83–89 (2017)."</p> <p>3- Final_checklist_birds - created based on the information available in "Dyer, E. E., Redding, D. W. & Blackburn, T. M. The global avian invasions atlas, a database of alien bird distributions worldwide. <em>Sci Data</em> <strong>4</strong>, 170041 (2017)."</p> <p>4- Final_checklist_freshwaterfish - created based on the information available in "Tedesco, P. A. <em>et al.</em> A global database on freshwater fish species occurrence in drainage basins. <em>Sci Data</em> <strong>4</strong>, 170141 (2017)."</p> <p>5- Final_checklist_macrofungi - created based on the information available in "Monteiro, M. <em>et al.</em> A database of the global distribution of alien macrofungi. <em>Biodiversity Data Journal </em><strong>8</strong>, e51459 (2020)."</p> <p>6- Final_checklist_mammals- created based on the information available in "Biancolini, D. <em>et al</em>. DAMA: the global Distribution of Alien Mammals database. <em>Ecology</em> <strong>102</strong>, (2021)."</p> <p>7- Final_checklist_plants- created based on the information available in "Kleunen, M. <em>et al.</em> The Global Naturalised Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. <em>Ecology</em> <strong>100</strong>, (2019)."</p> <p>8- Final_checklist_reptiles- created based on the information available in "Capinha, C. <em>et al.</em> Diversity, biogeography and the global flows of alien amphibians and reptiles. <em>Divers Distrib</em> <strong>23</strong>, 1313–1322 (2017)."</p> <p>9- Final_checklist_spiders- created based on the information shared by co-author Wolfgang Nentwig.</p>
Supplementary material 3 from: Anđelković AA, Lawson Handley L, Marchante E, Adriaens T, Brown PMJ, Tricarico E, Verbrugge LNH (2022) A review of volunteers' motivations to monitor and control invasive alien species. NeoBiota 73: 153-175. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.73.79636
List of recommendations for designing projects to ensure maximum recruitment and volunteer retention extracted from the studies used in the analysis (for their full references, please see Suppl. material 1) and their link to our recommendations
Supplementary material 2 from: Cerri J, Lioy S, Porporato M, Bertolino S (2022) Combining surveys and on-line searching volumes to analyze public awareness about invasive alien species: a case study with the invasive Asian yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina) in Italy. NeoBiota 73: 177-192. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.73.80359
Distribution of scores to the questions on the perceived impacts of V. velutina and its severity in relation to various threats for beekeeping
Supplementary material 2 from: Sirbu C, Miu IV, Gavrilidis AA, Gradinaru SR, Niculae IM, Preda C, Oprea A, Urziceanu M, Camen-Comanescu P, Nagoda E, Sirbu IM, Memedemin D, Anastasiu P (2022) Distribution and pathways of introduction of invasive alien plant species in Romania. NeoBiota 75: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.75.84684
Appendix S2. Altitudinal range of invasive and potentially invasive alien plant species recorded in Romania
FIGURE 3 in First record of three alien Auchenorrhyncha species from Europe: Acanalonia bivittata (Say, 1825), Branchana xanthota Li, 2011, and Dryadomorpha pallida Kirkaldy 1906 (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Acanaloniidae, Cicadellidae)
FIGURE 3. Dryadomorpha pallida (specimens from Italy, Veneto). A. male, dorsal habitus; B. female, dorsal habitus; C. head of 5th instar nymph, lateral view; D. 5th instar nymph, dorsal habitus; E. subgenital plates and valve, dorsal view; F. left pygofer lobe, lateral view; G. left style, ventral view; H. aedeagus and connective, ventral view; I. aedeagus and connective, lateral view.
FIGURE 1 in First record of three alien Auchenorrhyncha species from Europe: Acanalonia bivittata (Say, 1825), Branchana xanthota Li, 2011, and Dryadomorpha pallida Kirkaldy 1906 (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Acanaloniidae, Cicadellidae)
FIGURE 1. Acanalonia bivittata (male from Italy, Veneto). A. dorsal habitus; B. lateral habitus; C. male genitalia, lateral view.
FIGURE 2 in First record of three alien Auchenorrhyncha species from Europe: Acanalonia bivittata (Say, 1825), Branchana xanthota Li, 2011, and Dryadomorpha pallida Kirkaldy 1906 (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Acanaloniidae, Cicadellidae)
FIGURE 2. Branchana xanthota (male from Italy, Lombardia). A. dorsal habitus; B. apexes of pygofer lobes and inner processes; C. left pygofer lobe, lateral view; D. subgenital plates and valve, ventral view; E. left style, dorsal view; F. aedeagus and connective, ventral view; G. aedeagus and connective, lateral view.
FIGURE 2. a–b in Joppeicus paradoxus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Joppeicidae): a new alien species in the European Union?
FIGURE 2. a–b, Distribution of Joppeicus paradoxus Puton, 1881 (red circles—published records, see Table 1; yellow circles—new records). c–e, Deiqub cave and its surroundings, Socotra Island. Photos: c—J. Niedobová, d–e—J. Hájek.
FIGURE 1 in Joppeicus paradoxus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Joppeicidae): a new alien species in the European Union?
FIGURE 1. Habitus of Joppeicus paradoxus Puton, 1881. a–b—specimen from Canary Islands: Morro Jable (a—dorsal view, b—lateral view; body length 2.47 mm); c—specimen from Socotra: Deiqub cave (dorsal view; body length 2.52 mm); d—one of the syntype females. Photos: a–c—P. Kment, d—L. Fauvre.
Supplementary material 4 from: Schiffleithner V, Essl F (2016) Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park. NeoBiota 31: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.31.8071
Table S2. Percentage and numbers of populations of the three study species : Explanation note: Percentage and numbers of populations of the three study species in the five size classes (1 = 0–10m², 2 = 10–100m², 3 = 100–1,000m², 4 = 1,000–10,000m², 5 = >10,000m²) in the National Park Thayatal-Podyjí in 2010. Density classes (according to Braun-Blanquet 1964) are provided for Fallopia × bohemica and Impatiens glandulifera.
Supplementary material 3 from: Schiffleithner V, Essl F (2016) Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park. NeoBiota 31: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.31.8071
Table S1. Populations of Fallopia × bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera and Robinia pseudoacacia in the Austrian part of the National Park Thayatal-Podyjí : Explanation note: Populations of Fallopia × bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera and Robinia pseudoacacia in the Austrian part of the National Park Thayatal-Podyjí, indicating population size, changes in population size between both surveys, and if management was applied.
Supplementary material 1 from: Schiffleithner V, Essl F (2016) Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park. NeoBiota 31: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.31.8071
Figure S1. Distribution of the three study species (Fallopia × bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera, Robinia pseudoacacia) in the National Park Thayatal-Podyjí in 2010 : Explanation note: Robinia pseudoacacia predominantly invades forests near settlements, Impatiens glandulifera the Thaya river valley, and Fallopia × bohemica occurs mostly near settlements close to streams.
Supplementary material 2 from: Schiffleithner V, Essl F (2016) Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park. NeoBiota 31: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.31.8071
Figure S2. Distribution of the three study species, Fallopia × bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera, and Robinia pseudoacacia in the Austrian part of the National Park Thayatal-Podyjí in 2001 :
Supplementary material 3 from: Schindler S, Staska B, Adam M, Rabitsch W, Essl F (2015) Alien species and public health impacts in Europe: a literature review. NeoBiota 27: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5007
Spatial scale and location of the original and review articles: Explanation note: Spatial scale (global, continental, subcontinental, national, subnational, Local lab/field trials) and location of the original (n=56) and review (n=21) articles.
Supplementary material 1 from: Schindler S, Staska B, Adam M, Rabitsch W, Essl F (2015) Alien species and public health impacts in Europe: a literature review. NeoBiota 27: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5007
Literature on human health impacts by alien species in Europe used in this review (n=77 articles): Explanation note: Literature on human health impacts by alien species in Europe used in this literature review (n=77 articles). Given are article type, full citation, authors, publication year, journal (source) name, species under concern, taxonomic group, spatial scale, country / region, invasion stage-impact-management, climate change impact, criterion, trend in criterion, severity of impact, trend of impact, management measures, costs, origin, and pathway of first introduction.
Supplementary material 2 from: Schindler S, Staska B, Adam M, Rabitsch W, Essl F (2015) Alien species and public health impacts in Europe: a literature review. NeoBiota 27: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5007
Alien species studied in the 56 original articles.: Explanation note: Alien species studied in the 56 original articles, their regions of origin (continents) and their introduction pathways.
Supplementary material 3 from: Zimmermann H, Loos J, von Wehrden H, Fischer J (2015) Aliens in Transylvania: risk maps of invasive alien plant species in Central Romania. NeoBiota 24: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.24.7772
Risk maps for all eight study species.: Explanation note: Risk maps for all eight study species derived from the MAXENT model.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.