Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedDec 2005View details →

FIGURE 4 in Sipunculans from the coast of northern Cyprus (eastern Mediterranean Sea)

FIGURE 4. Hooks of Phascolosoma species from the Cypriot coast. A. Hooks of P. (P.) agassizii agassizii (ESFM–SIP/98–35). B. Hook of P. (P.) granulatum (ESFM–SIP/98–36). C. Hooks of P. (P.) scolops (ESFM–SIP/98–39). D. Hooks of P. (P.) stephensoni (ESFM–SIP/98–2). Scale line A 24 µm, B 30 µm, C 23 µm, D 15 µm

FIGURES 20–28 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 20–28. Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. 20 — process 'reticulation', 21–28 — variability of processes (mid-sections on the circumference of egg); scale bar from Fig. 21 applies also to Figs 22–28. (DIC)

FIGURES 7–13 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 7–13. Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. — oral cavity armature; 7 — the first band of teeth, 8 — the first, the third band of teeth (dorsal teeth) and the ring fold (the second band of teeth is not visible because it is covered by the ring fold), 9 — dorsal teeth, 10 — ventral teeth, 10–13 — variability in the number of ventral teeth of the third band (10 — one medio-ventral tooth, 11 — two medio-ventral teeth arranged in one row, 12 — three medio-ventral teeth arranged in one row, 13 — four medio-ventral teeth arranged in a field). Asterisks indicate the most dorsal lamella. (7–8: SEM, 9–13: DIC)

FIGURES 33–36 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 33–36. Macrobiotus gerlachae Pilato et al., 2004. 33 — third macroplacoids and microplacoids, 34 — claws III, 35–36 — egg processes (mid-sections on the circumference of egg). (paratypes, PCM)

FIGURES 1–6 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 1–6. Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. 1-2 — buccal apparatus (1 — ventral view, 2 — dorsal view), 3 — the end of the buccal tube with pharyngeal apophyses (ventral view), 4 — ventral microplacoid (ventral view), 5–6 — claws III (note fine granulation on legs). (5: SEM, the rest: DIC).

FIGURES 14–19 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 14–19. Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. 14–15 — eggs, 16–19 — single processes surrounded by areolae (16–17 — the process is surrounded by five other processes and by ten areolae, 18–19 — the process is surrounded by six other processes and by ten (18) or eleven (19) areolae). (14, 16, 18: DIC, 15, 17, 19: SEM)

FIGURES 29–32 in Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae, richtersi group) from Cyprus

FIGURES 29–32. Macrobiotus sklodowskae sp. nov. — variability of processes (note that processes may be strongly wrinkled and completely smooth). (SEM)

FIGURE 6 in A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus

FIGURE 6: Plot of centroid size of skulls against their score on the first principal component (PC1) performed on Procrustes Residuals (GLS surimposition). The TPS deformation grid (magnified six times to make the change visible) depicts the morphological changes from the M. m. domesticus mean shape to that of M. cypriacus for dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of skull.

FIGURE 4 in A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus

FIGURE 4: Dorsal, ventral and lateral views of the holotype (n° 2005988) and paratype 1 (n° 2005989) of Mus cypriacus.

FIGURE 1 in A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus

FIGURE 1: Location of the sampling localities for the genetic (black dot) and morphological (empty square) studies.

FIGURE 7 in A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus

FIGURE 7: Differentiation of molars and mandible outlines of the Mediterranean species of Mus sp. (A) Mandible; first and second canonical axes (CA1/CA2) with mean outline for each taxa. (B) Relationship between shape (CA1) and size (Ha1 area) of mandibles. (C) First lower molar. CA1/ CA2 with mean outline of each taxon. (D) First upper molar; CA1/CA2 with mean outline of each taxon. Each dot represents a specimen. The anatomical description with morphological terms for molars (following Chaline 1974) and mandibles (following Atchley 1993) is displayed.

FIGURE 2 in A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus

FIGURE 2: Location of landmarks on the ventral and dorsal views of the mouse skull. See text for the anatomical description of landmarks.

FIGURES 8–12 in New records of the water mite genus Arrenurus from Iran, with the description of two new species from Iran and Cyprus (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Arrenuridae)

FIGURES 8–12. Arrenurus (Micruracarus) cyprioticus spec. nov. (8, 9, 11 = holotype male, 10 = paratype male, Iran, 12 = paratype female): 8 = idiosoma, dorsal view, 9 = idiosoma, ventral view, 10 = idiosoma, lateral view, 11 = palp, 12 = idiosoma, ventral view. Scale Bars: 8, 9, 11 = 50 µm, 10 = 100 µm, 12 = 200 µm.

FIGURES 1–7 in New records of the water mite genus Arrenurus from Iran, with the description of two new species from Iran and Cyprus (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Arrenuridae)

FIGURES 1–7. Arrenurus albator (Müller), male (1–3 Iran, 4–5 Turkey, 6–7 The Netherlands): 1 = idiosoma, dorsal view, 2 = detail of petiole, dorsal view, 3 = detail of petiole, lateral view, 4 = cauda, 5 = detail of petiole, lateral view, 6 = cauda, 7 = detail of petiole, lateral view. Scale Bars: 4– 7 = 50 µm, 1–3 = 100 µm.

FIGURES 13–16 in New records of the water mite genus Arrenurus from Iran, with the description of two new species from Iran and Cyprus (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Arrenuridae)

FIGURES 13–16. Arrenurus (Truncaturus) minutus spec. nov. (13–15 = holotype male, 16 = paratype female): 13 = idiosoma, dorsal view, 14 = idiosoma, ventral view, 15 = palp, 16 = idiosoma, ventral view. Scale Bars: 13–15 = 50 µm, 16 = 200 µm.

FIGURES 4–8. Lithobius anderssoni n in The centipede fauna (Chilopoda) of the island of Cyprus, with one new lithobiomorph species

FIGURES 4–8. Lithobius anderssoni n. sp., holotype, Ƥ, Cyprus, 1 km E of Letimbou, loc. 126, 9.V.1981, H.W. Waldén leg. (GNM): Figure 4, left ocelli and Tömösváry's organ, scale bar 0.2 mm; Figure 5, anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite, scale bar 0.2 mm; Figure 6, TT 4–8, scale bar 1 mm; Figure 7, right female gonopod, ventral view, scale bar 0.1 mm; Figure 8, right female gonopod, dorsal view, scale bar 0.1 mm.

FIGURE 9. Lithobius pamukkalensis, L. parvicornis, L. carinatus and L in The centipede fauna (Chilopoda) of the island of Cyprus, with one new lithobiomorph species

FIGURE 9. Lithobius pamukkalensis, L. parvicornis, L. carinatus and L. zeylanus, distribution in Cyprus.

FIGURE 22 in The centipede fauna (Chilopoda) of the island of Cyprus, with one new lithobiomorph species

FIGURE 22. Chorotype spectrum and endemic percentage of the centipede fauna of Cyprus. C. cf. trisulcatus, G. cf. alpinus, G. cf. carpophagus, Schizotaenia sp. indet., Schendyla cf. nemorensis and Schendylidae gen. sp. indet were excluded from the analysis due to unresolved taxonomic identity. END: Endemic, EME: East Mediterranean, EUR: European, MED: Mediterranean, TUE: Turano – European, TUM: Turano – Mediterranean, WPA: West Palearctic.

FIGURE 18 in The centipede fauna (Chilopoda) of the island of Cyprus, with one new lithobiomorph species

FIGURE 18. Clinopodes escherichii, Geophilus cf. carpophagus and G. cf. alpinus, distribution in Cyprus.

FIGURES 11–14. Lithobius ferganensis Trotzina, 1880 in The centipede fauna (Chilopoda) of the island of Cyprus, with one new lithobiomorph species

FIGURES 11–14. Lithobius ferganensis Trotzina, 1880, Cyprus, Tripylos, 900 m SE p. 4619, 1100 m, loc. 115, 7.V.1981, H.W. Waldén leg. (GNM): Figure 11, left ocelli and Tömösváry's organ, scale bar 0.1 mm; Figure 12, anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite, scale bar 0.1 mm; Figure 13, right female gonopod, ventral view, scale bar 0.1 mm; Figure 14, right female gonopod, dorsal view, scale bar 0.1 mm.