Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,085
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,085 results for “Documentation”
Dataset of "What Should Developers Be Aware Of? An Empirical Study on the Directives of API Documentation"
<p>Dataset of <em>What Should Developers Be Aware Of? An Empirical Study on the Directives of API Documentation</em> (Martin Monperrus, Michael Eichberg, Elif Tekes, Mira Mezini), In Empirical Software Engineering, Springer, 2011.</p> <p><br> * dataset-src.tar.bz2 contains the source code of the Java libraries used as raw data.<br> * dataset.xml.bz2 contains the API documentation extracted from source code.<br> * directives.xml.bz2 contains the API directives found during the exploratory case study.<br> * directive-appendix.pdf is a human-readable PDF version of directives.xml.bz2.<br> <br> All datasets are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License: if you use them, please cite:<br> </p>
ICDAR2015 competition on smartphone document capture and OCR (SmartDoc) - Challenge 2
<p><strong>ICDAR2015 competition on smartphone document capture and OCR (SmartDoc)</strong></p> <p><strong>Challenge 2: MOBILE OCR COMPETITION</strong></p> <p>The goal of the competition is to extract the textual content from document images which are captured by mobile phones. The images are taken under varying conditions to provide a challenging input. The dataset was prepared for ICDAR2015-SmartDoc competition. For more details about the dataset please visit the competition's website:</p> <p>https://sites.google.com/site/icdar15smartdoc/home</p> <p>http://smartdoc.univ-lr.fr</p> <p>You may also refer to the following paper for more details on the ICDAR2015-SmartDoc competition:</p> <p>Jean-Christophe Burie, Joseph Chazalon, Mickaël Coustaty, Sébastien Eskenazi, Muhammad Muzzamil Luqman, Maroua Mehri, Nibal Nayef, Jean-Marc OGIER, Sophea Prum and Marçal Rusinol: “ICDAR2015 Competition on Smartphone Document Capture and OCR (SmartDoc)”, In 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2015.</p> <p><strong>If you use this dataset, please send us a short email at <icdar.smartdoc (at) gmail.com> to tell us why it was useful to you, and whether you have results or publications we can reference on our website. Thank you!</strong></p>
Survey Data Set Part 1 - Attitudes Towards Videos as a Documentation Option for Communication in Requirements Engineering
<p>In 2017, we conducted an online survey to explore software professionals' attitudes towards videos as a documentation option for communication in requirements engineering. The survey covered the following topics:</p> <ul> <li>Demographics</li> <li>Attitude towards videos as a medium in RE including its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats</li> <li>Current production and use of videos in RE, respectively the obstacles that prevent the production and use of videos</li> </ul> <p>64 out of 106 software professionals from industry and academia completed the survey. The survey was implemented in LimeSurvey and distributed across several communication channels such as LinkedIn, ResearchGate, and a mailing list of a German RE professionals group.</p> <p>This dataset includes the following files:</p> <ul> <li>"Raw and analyzed data.xlsx" contains the raw and analyzed survey responses which are anonymized <ul> <li>This data includes <em>demographics </em>and <em>attitude</em>.</li> <li>The data on <em>video production and use</em> are included in: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4064741">Survey Data Set Part 2 - Attitudes Towards Videos as a Documentation Option for Communication in Requirements Engineering</a>.</li> </ul> </li> <li>"Survey - Offline version.docx" contains the questions and possible answers of the survey</li> <li>"Survey - Offline version.pdf" contains the questions and possible answers of the survey</li> </ul> <p>This survey was designed, conducted, and analyzed by Oliver Karras (<a href="https://twitter.com/KarrasOliver">@KarrasOliver</a>).</p>
ICDAR 2019 Competition on Image Retrieval for Historical Handwritten Documents [HisIR19] Dataset
<p>This dataset contains the training and test set used in the ICDAR 2019 Competition on Image Retrieval for Historical Handwritten Documents.</p> <p>This competition investigates the performance of large-scale retrieval of historical document images based on<br> writing style. Based on large image data sets provided by cultural heritage institutions and digital libraries, providing<br> a total of 20 000 document images representing about 10 000 writers, divided in three types: writers of (i) manuscript books, (ii) letters, (iii) charters and legal documents. We focus on the task of automatic image retrieval to simulate common scenarios of humanities research, such as writer retrieval.</p> <p>The training data set encompasses images from (i) Letters A, where each writer contributed one or three images; (ii) Manuscripts, where each writer was represented by five consecutive images from a single book.<br> In total, it contains 300 writers contributing one page, 100 writers contributing three pages, and 120 writers contributing five pages resulting in 1200 images of 520 writers.</p> <p>The test data set contains 20 000 images: About 7 500 pages stem from isolated documents (partially anonymous writers, contributing one page each), and about 12 500 pages are from writers that contributed three or five pages.</p> <p> </p> <p>If you use this dataset, please cite:</p> <p>V. Christlein, A. Nicolaou, M. Seuret, D. Stutzmann, A. Maier: "ICDAR 2019 Competition on Image Retrieval for Historical Handwritten Documents", in 15th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2019, Sydney, Australia</p> <p> </p>
Wake data documentation for a wind turbine rotor with winglets
<p>This is the documentation of data, measured in a experimental campaign, in which the effects of winglets<br> on a model wind turbine rotor were investigated</p>
Turtle Shell Rattle Use by Indigenous Peoples of the Contiguous United States: Ethnographic Documentation
<p>**When using this data and information, please cite all of the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>Gillreath-Brown, Andrew. 2019. Creation to Rhythm: An Ethnographic and Archaeological Survey of Turtle Shell Rattles and Spirituality in the United States. Journal of Ethnobiology 39(3):425–444. <a href="http://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-39.3.425">http://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-39.3.425</a></p> <p>Gillreath-Brown, Andrew. 2019*. Turtle Shell Rattle Use by Indigenous Peoples of the Contiguous United States: Ethnographic Documentation. Version 1. Zenodo. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545989">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545989</a>. Date of use: day month year.**</p> <p>*Please update year and DOI if you cite a newer version. The DOI changes with each version in Zenodo, or you can use the DOI to cite all versions.</p> <p>**<em>Example:</em> Date of use: 17 April 2019.</p> </blockquote> <p><strong>OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this work is to summarize information from published and unpublished ethnographies that document how Indigenous Peoples of the contiguous United States used—and, in some cases, continue to use—turtle shell rattles. The data contained herein have been used to suggest and support interpretations of turtle shell rattle remains recovered from the archaeological record across the United States.</p> <p>This compendium draws on an extensive database compiled and maintained by the author. The compendium lists the relevant ethnographic references; it gives the state and region of the United States and the Indigenous group that use(d) turtle shell rattles; it identifies the turtle shell rattle type and the various chelonian taxa by both their scientific and common names; and it describes the documented uses for turtle shell rattles for specific ethnic groups. I intend this compendium to serve as a summary of, and a guide to, the extensive ethnographic literature, which I encourage the reader to consult for additional, more-detailed information, as well as to understand the unique context.</p> <p>I used several criteria for deciding which information to include in the compendium. First, I was interested in what Indigenous Peoples used turtle shell rattles or turtle substitute rattles for (see Gillreath-Brown 2019) across the United States. I also try to include alternate or contemporary preferred names of the Native American groups in addition to the group name used in the literature. Second, I include primary ethnographic references in addition to other supporting references. In addition to providing the references in a word document, references are also compiled in the author’s Paperpile account, which is publically available at <a href="https://paperpile.com/shared/KU55Rg">https://paperpile.com/shared/KU55Rg</a>. Third, I was also interested in the type of rattle that was used and what turtle taxa (given by its scientific name according to Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2017) was used in the construction of the rattle(s). I also provide the common name for scientific names. Fourth, I provide a use category for the rattles, which is comprised of ritual/ceremonial, medicinal/healing, and myth/creation. Finally, an ethnographic description and additional comments are provided to give further context for the turtle shell rattles and to further expand on the use categories. For example, for a use category of ritual/ceremonial, the description and comments field will generally list the dances or ceremonies where turtle shell rattles were used.</p> <p>A goal of the compendium is to aid researchers in their interpretations of archaeological turtle shell rattle remains, as well as to understand and document Indigenous music. Although turtle shell rattles have been present in the United States since the Archaic Period (ca. 8000–1000 BC), the specific uses of turtle shell rattles vary from group to group and over time. Some Indigenous Peoples may not have traditionally used turtle shell rattles or at least not for specific dances (e.g., Stomp Dance). For example, Howard and Kurath (1959:6) explain that the Ponca (of the midwestern United States) likely borrowed the stomp dance from eastern groups. Many Indigenous Peoples were forced from their traditional homelands and were placed in close proximity to other Indigenous Peoples, such as in the state of Oklahoma, that they may not have interacted with the past. Additionally, the Seminoles of Oklahoma may have learned about the use of condensed-milk can rattles as a substitute for turtle shell rattles from the Natchez-Cherokees around 1920 in Gore, Oklahoma (Howard and Lena 1984:117).</p> <p>Turtle shell rattle type is defined by the author and is presented in Gillreath-Brown 2019 (see also Gillreath-Brown and Peres 2017, 2018). In published literature, “turtle shell rattle” is phrased many different ways including: turtle shell rattle, terrapin carapace rattles, turtle carapace rattle, shell shakers, terrapin rattle, turtle shell shakers, terrapin shell rattle, turtle shell shackles, tortoise shell rattle, turtle shell leggings, and tortoise rattle (see Gillreath-Brown 2019: Supplemental Content, Supplementary Table 4). Additionally, sometimes turtle shell is hyphenated (i.e., turtle-shell). Tortoise and terrapin are also used as substitutes for “turtle.”</p> <p>Download the current version of the excel file below.</p> <p>References cited in the description above are in the word document “References Cited” and in Paperpile, except for Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (2017).</p> <p>Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [Rhodin AGJ, Iverson JB, Bour R, Fritz U, Georges A, Shaffer HB, et al]. 2017. Turtles of the world: Annotated checklist and atlas of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. 8th ed. In: Rhodin AGJ, Iverson JB, van Dijk PP, Saumure RA, Buhlmann KA, Pritchard PCH, et al, editors. Conservation biology of freshwater turtles and tortoises: A compilation project of the IUCN/SSC tortoise and freshwater turtle specialist group. Chelonian Research Monographs 2017;7: 1–292. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017">https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017</a></p> <p><strong>Acknowledgments</strong></p> <p>This publication would not have been possible without the support of many people and institutions. I also thank the editors and reviewers for the original article (DOI) that was published in the <em>Journal of Ethnobiology </em>Special Issue, “Ethnobiology Through Song.” I also thank my colleague Dr. Tanya Peres, who I have worked extensively with on this topic.</p> <p><em>Andrew Gillreath-Brown</em> is currently a PhD Candidate in the Department of Anthropology at Washington State University.</p>
Fig. 2 in Genetic divergence of a newly documented population of the cecidogenous micromoth Eugnosta azapaensis Vargas & Moreira (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile
Fig. 2. Median joining network of the haplotypes of the DNA barcode fragment (658 bp) of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of Eugnosta azapaensis from Azapa (white) and Chaca (black) valleys, Atacama Desert of northern Chile. H1, H2, H3, H4 haplotypes; circles proportional to the frequency of the respective haplotype; numbers between circles indicates variable sites; gray triangle a median vector.
Fig. 1 in Genetic divergence of a newly documented population of the cecidogenous micromoth Eugnosta azapaensis Vargas & Moreira (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile
Fig. 1. The study area in South America (left) and the sampling sites (right) of Eugnosta azapaensis in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. The type locality Azapa Valley (black circle) and the newly documented locality Chaca Valley (black triangle).
Text-fig. 7. Plan for expansion of museum from 1924. (City council Lázně Bělohrad, construction board, construction documentation, parcel no. 191.). / Plán přístavby muzea z roku 1924. (Městský úřad Lázně Bělohrad, stavební úřad, stavební dokumentace k č. p. 191.). in Frič Museum In Lázně Bělohrad
Text-fig. 7. Plan for expansion of museum from 1924. (City council Lázně Bělohrad, construction board, construction documentation, parcel no. 191.). / Plán přístavby muzea z roku 1924. (Městský úřad Lázně Bělohrad, stavební úřad, stavební dokumentace k č. p. 191.).
Text-fig. 2. The Prague Basin and localities of the documented scolecodont occurrences (map after Havlíček and Štorch 1990) 1. Kosov Quarry, 2. Pod lanovkou, 3. Koledník, 4. Liščí Quarry, 5. cut of the road from Loděnice to Bubovice, 6. Arethusina Gorge. in Revision Of Kettnerites Žebera, 1935 (Scolecodonta, Silurian Of The Barrandian Area, Czech Republic): Preliminary Results
Text-fig. 2. The Prague Basin and localities of the documented scolecodont occurrences (map after Havlíček and Štorch 1990) 1. Kosov Quarry, 2. Pod lanovkou, 3. Koledník, 4. Liščí Quarry, 5. cut of the road from Loděnice to Bubovice, 6. Arethusina Gorge.
Figs. 1–2 in First high-altitude record of Bucculatrix mirnae Vargas and Moreira (Lepidoptera, Bucculatricidae) on a newly documented host plant: the importance of host plant distribution for conservation on the western slopes of the Andes mountains of northern Chile
Figs. 1–2. The habitats of Bucculatrix mirnae in the arid northern Chile. (1) The lowland Azapa Valley (type locality) located in the coastal Atacama Desert close sea level. (2) The highland neighborhood of Putre village at about 3500 m elevation on the western slopes of the Andes.
Video Documentation for the Giant Human Sorting Network event in Vienna, Austria, September 19, 2019
<p>This video is a supplementary material for the article "Large and Parallel Human Sorting Networks" by Stefan Szeider, to appear in the proceeedings of CMSC 2024, the 7th Conference on Creative Mathematical Sciences Communication, Springer Verlag, 2024.</p> <p> </p>
FIGURE 9 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 9. Comparison of volume renderings of one nymph of BSPG 1967 XX generated by Amira 5.6 (left) and Drishti 2.4 (right) (images with system based pseudocolour). Note especially the differences of the level of details in the marked areas (arrows).
FIGURE 8 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 8. Close-ups of maxillary palp of one nymph of BSPG 1967 XX. 1, Palp of red-coloured nymph in Figure 4 documented with stereo imaging. Images presented as red-cyan stereo-anaglyphs; please use red-cyan glasses to view, red left, cyan right. 2-4, Close-ups of volume rendering of maxillary palp and part of antenna of red-coloured nymph in Figure 4; documented at three different grey values. 5, Combined version of 2-4, arrows point to setae. Abbreviations are the same as in Figures 2 and 4.
FIGURE 7 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 7. Comparison of mouthparts of one nymph of BSPG 1967 XX and first instar of Periplaneta americana. 1-3, Surface reconstruction of the mouthparts of one nymph in amber; based on micro-CT data. Same individual as in Figure 2, about lateral (1 and 3) and frontal (2) views. 4-5, Head with mouthparts of first instar nymph of P. americana; frontal view of the head (4) and colour-marked close-up image of the mouthparts (5), composite autofluorescence image. Abbreviations: hp, hypopharynx; lb, labium; lp, labial palp; mx, maxilla. Other abbreviations are the same as in Figures 2 and 4.
FIGURE 5 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 5. Volume renderings of one nymph of BSPG 1967 XX (red-coloured specimen in Figure 4) in about lateral (1-2), ventral (3-4), and dorsal (5) views generated with Drishti 2.4 based on micro-CT data. Abbreviations: cl, clypeus; co I, coxa of prothoracic leg; fe I, femur of prothoracic leg; lr, labrum; md, mandible; pt I, praetarsus of prothoracic leg (tibial claw); ta I, tarsus of prothoracic leg; ti I, tibia of prothoracic leg; a1–a7, abdominal segments 1–7. Other abbreviations are the same as in Figure 2.
FIGURE 6 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 6. Nymphs of the extant species Periplaneta americana (1-3) and Blaberus craniifer (4-5). 1-3, Hatchling of P. americana in dorsal (1), lateral (2), and ventral (3) views documented with compound microscope. 4-5, Early instar nymph of Blaberus craniifer in ventral (4) and dorsal (5) views documented with composite autofluorescence microscopy. Abbreviations: co III, coxa of metathoracic leg; fe III, femur of metathoracic leg; ta III, tarsus of metathoracic leg; ti III, tibia of metathoracic leg. Other abbreviations are the same as in Figure 2 and 4.
FIGURE 3 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 3. Overview of BSPG 1967 XX, documented with stereo imaging from all available sides of the specimen (1- 3). Images presented as red-cyan stereo-anaglyphs; please use red-cyan glasses to view.
FIGURE 1 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 1. Overview of BSPG 1967 XX, part of the Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich. Germany; documented with composite imaging. Single piece of Baltic amber with inclusion of 13 cockroach nymphs.
FIGURE 2 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach
FIGURE 2. Close-ups of nymphs in amber (BSPG 1967 XX). 1, Overview of a single nymph (red-coloured specimen in Figure 4). 2, Head with antennae and maxillary palp equipped with setae of specimen in 1, compound eyes not observable. 3, Cerci equipped with setae (blue-coloured specimen in Figure 4). 4, Close-up of antenna equipped with setae (yellow-coloured specimen in Figure 4), arrows point to setae. Abbreviations: a4–a6, abdominal segments 4–6; an, antenna; ce, cercus; hc, head capsule; mp, maxillary palp; ms, mesonotum; mt, metanotum; pn, pronotum; pl, coxa of prothoracic leg; ta, terminal article of the antenna.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.