Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
424
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
424 results for “Ecological genetics”
Figure 1 in Is mimicry a diversification-driver in ants? Biogeography, ecology, ethology, genetics and morphology define a second West-Palaearctic Colobopsis species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Figure 1. The model species and the two detected chromatic model patterns of Colobopsis: A, Crematogaster scutellaris; B, CSL Colobopsis from Sicily; C, Dolichoderus quadripunctatus from Tuscany; D, DQL Colobopsis from Tuscany.
Historical connections between Atlantic Forest and Amazonia drove genetic and ecological diversity in Lithobates palmipes (Anura, Ranidae)
<p>The Atlantic and Amazon rainforests have a shared but unclear past, with intermittent connections resulting from historical climate change. We investigate these connections by studying the phylogeography and climatic niche of the disjunct distributed frog<em> Lithobates palmipes</em>. We sequenced two fragments of mitochondrial DNA from Atlantic Forest (AtF) and Amazonia (AmF) individuals and evaluated how genetic diversity is distributed in space and whether past demographic changes occurred. Also, we evaluated the existence of past suitable connections between biomes for<em> L. palmipes</em> through ecological niche models (ENM) and tested for niche divergence. The AtF group is nested within the AmF group and closely related to individuals from eastern Amazonia, a pattern recovered in many species that used northeast connection routes. We found evidence of recurrent use of connections in different directions and time during the Pleistocene, resulting in genetic structure between biomes, with no signal of demographic change and evidence of niche divergence across both genetic groups. ENMs indicated suitable areas connecting forests throughout northeastern Brazil during the Pleistocene. Mitochondrial lineages do not match biomes exactly. One lineage is composed of AtF populations and eastern Amazonia individuals. The other is composed of western Amazonia individuals, suggesting an effect of past climatic heterogeneity within the Amazonia forest. This is the first evidence that this route drove genetic and ecological diversity for amphibians recently, a group with habits and ecological requirements different from other vertebrates that have been shown to use this putative corridor.</p>
FIGURES 41–45. 41 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 41–45. 41, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: pronotum, right lateral view; 42, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: pronotum, right lateral view; 43, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: pronotum, right lateral view; 44, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: pronotum, right lateral view; 45, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976 (left), and D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković- Gospodnetić, 1976 (right): parietal part of the head at eye level showing spinules, right lateral view.
FIGURES 37–40. 37 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 37–40. 37, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: posterior part of the head, right lateral view; 38, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: posterior part of the head, right lateral view; 39, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: parietal part of the head at eye level, right lateral view; 40, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: parietal part of the head at eye level, right lateral view.
FIGURES 33–36. 33 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 33–36. 33, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: head and pronotum protruding from case, right lateral view; 34, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971: head and pronotum, right lateral view; 35, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: head and pronotum, right lateral view; 36, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976: head and pronotum, right lateral view.
FIGURES 27–32 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 27–32. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 27, right foreleg, lateral view; 28, right mid-leg, lateral view; 29, right hind-leg, lateral view; 30, gill diagram: position of filaments on left side of abdominal segments I– VIII, ●, gills always present, O, gills not always present; 31, abdominal segment IX, dorsal view; 32, anal proleg, left lateral view.
FIGURES 46–53 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 46–53. Metanota of Drusus spp., showing anteromedian (sa1) and posteromedian (sa2) sclerites. 46–47, Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976; 48–49, Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971; 50–51, D. radovanovici septentrionis Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976; 52–53, Drusus croaticus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971.
FIGURES 13–15 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 13–15. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 13, gill diagram: position of filaments on left side of abdominal segments I–VIII; ●, gills always present; O, gills not always present; 14, abdominal segment IX, dorsal view; 15, anal proleg, left lateral view.
FIGURES 22–26 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 22–26. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 22, head, frontal view; 23, right mandible, dorsal view; 24, pronotum, right lateral view; 25, white recumbent setae on posterior part of pronotum, right lateral view; 26, thorax (pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum), dorsal view.
FIGURES 16–21 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 16–21. Drusus medianus Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1976. 16, larva in its case, right lateral view; 17, larva, right lateral view; 18, head, pronotum and mesonotum, right lateral view; 19, head with spinules above eye, right lateral view; 20, area with spinules, right lateral view; 21, spinules, right lateral view.
FIGURES 7–12 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 7–12. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 7, pronotum left lateral view; 8, pronotum, right lateral view; 9, thorax (pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum), dorsal view; 10, right foreleg, lateral view; 11, right mid-leg, lateral view; 12, hind-leg, lateral view.
FIGURES 1–6 in Description of the larvae of Drusus ramae Marinković- Gospodnetić and Drusus medianus Marinković- Gospodnetić (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with some genetic, distributional, ecological, faunal and conservation notes
FIGURES 1–6. Drusus ramae Marinković-Gospodnetić, 1971. 1, larva in its case, right lateral view; 2, larva, right lateral view; 3, head and pronotum, right lateral view; 4, head and pronotum, left dorsolateral view; 5, head, frontal view; 6, right mandible, dorsal view.
Supplementary material 3 from: Lörz A-N, Tandberg AHS, Willassen E, Driskell A (2018) Rhachotropis (Eusiroidea, Amphipoda) from the North East Atlantic. In: Brix S, Lörz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 75–101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19814
Figure S1. Tree showing COI sequence cluster derived from ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery) analysis using simple distances and default parameter settings. :
Supplementary material 2 from: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Jazdzewska AM, Hughes L, Tandberg AHS, Pabis K, Stransky B, Krapp-Schickel T, Sorbe JC, Hendrycks E, Vader W, Frutos I, Horton T, Jazdzewski K, Peart R, Beermann J, Coleman CO, Buhl-Mortensen L, Corbari L, Havermans C, Tato R, Campean AJ (2018) Amphipod family distributions around Iceland. In: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19854
Supplementary material 2 from: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Jazdzewska AM, Hughes L, Tandberg AHS, Pabis K, Stransky B, Krapp-Schickel T, Sorbe JC, Hendrycks E, Vader W, Frutos I, Horton T, Jazdzewski K, Peart R, Beermann J, Coleman CO, Buhl-Mortensen L, Corbari L, Havermans C, Tato R, Campean AJ (2018) Amphipod family distributions around Iceland. In: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19854
Supplementary material 3 from: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Jazdzewska AM, Hughes L, Tandberg AHS, Pabis K, Stransky B, Krapp-Schickel T, Sorbe JC, Hendrycks E, Vader W, Frutos I, Horton T, Jazdzewski K, Peart R, Beermann J, Coleman CO, Buhl-Mortensen L, Corbari L, Havermans C, Tato R, Campean AJ (2018) Amphipod family distributions around Iceland. In: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19854
Supplementary material 3 from: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Jazdzewska AM, Hughes L, Tandberg AHS, Pabis K, Stransky B, Krapp-Schickel T, Sorbe JC, Hendrycks E, Vader W, Frutos I, Horton T, Jazdzewski K, Peart R, Beermann J, Coleman CO, Buhl-Mortensen L, Corbari L, Havermans C, Tato R, Campean AJ (2018) Amphipod family distributions around Iceland. In: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19854
Supplementary material 1 from: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Jazdzewska AM, Hughes L, Tandberg AHS, Pabis K, Stransky B, Krapp-Schickel T, Sorbe JC, Hendrycks E, Vader W, Frutos I, Horton T, Jazdzewski K, Peart R, Beermann J, Coleman CO, Buhl-Mortensen L, Corbari L, Havermans C, Tato R, Campean AJ (2018) Amphipod family distributions around Iceland. In: Brix S, Lorz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19854
Table 1. Samples used for present study. : Explanation note: Stations are organised according to the percentage of amphipods identified to the family level. Only the stations marked in green were used for primer analysis, while all were the basis for map preparation. Amphipod taxa are presented from the most to the least abundant in all samples.
Supplementary material 1 from: Lörz A-N, Tandberg AHS, Willassen E, Driskell A (2018) Rhachotropis (Eusiroidea, Amphipoda) from the North East Atlantic. In: Brix S, Lörz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 75–101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19814
Table S1. Extended overview of all samples used in analyses with geographical and environmental details : Explanation note: Depths indicated in red have been found using the latitude and longitude information with the datapoint and the bathymetry-layer on Google Earth Pro. Depths indicated in blue are inferred from the general depths in the named (no latitude or longitude given) geographical location, given bathymetry-layer on Google Earth Pro.
Supplementary material 1 from: Jażdżewska AM, Corbari L, Driskell A, Frutos I, Havermans C, Hendrycks E, Hughes L, Lörz A-N, Stransky B, Tandberg AHS, Vader W, Brix S (2018) A genetic fingerprint of Amphipoda from Icelandic waters – the baseline for further biodiversity and biogeography studies. In: Brix S, Lörz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 55–73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19931
Table S1 : Explanation note: Amphipod and outgroup accession numbers in BOLD, GenBank and station data.
Supplementary material 4 from: Lörz A-N, Tandberg AHS, Willassen E, Driskell A (2018) Rhachotropis (Eusiroidea, Amphipoda) from the North East Atlantic. In: Brix S, Lörz A-N, Stransky B, Svavarsson J (Eds) Amphipoda from the IceAGE-project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology). ZooKeys 731: 75–101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.731.19814
Figure S2. Bayesian consensus tree from COI sequences. Numbers on branches are posterior probabilities. See text for further information. :
FIGURES 14,15 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Group in Greece: Rhyacophila kykladica Malicky & Sipahiler 1993 (stat. prom.) (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae). Morphological description, genetic and ecological features
FIGURES 14,15. Males of Rhyacophila spp. 14a–14e, R. kykladica Malicky & Sipahiler 1993: 14a, general view of genitalia, left lateral; 14b, apicodorsal lobes and preanal appendages, dorsal; 14c, structures of segment X, ventral; 14d, left inferior appendage, left lateral. 14e, left paramere, left lateral. 15a–15e, R. fasciata Hagen 1859: 15a, general view of genitalia, left lateral; 15b, apicodorsal lobes and preanal appendages, dorsal; 15c, structures of segment X, ventral; 15d, left inferior appendage, left lateral; 15e, left paramere, left lateral. Scale bars: 14a–14d, 15a–15d = 0.5 mm. 14e, 15e = 200 µm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.