Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
796
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
796 results for “Eutardigrada”
Figure 2 in The first record of Macrobiotus vladimiri Bertolani, Biserov, Rebecchi & Cesari, 2011 (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 2. Macrobiotus vladimiri Bertolani, Biserov, Rebecchi & Cesari, 2011 from the Polish population – buccal apparatus (PCM), dorsoventral projection with dorsal teeth of the third band and dorsal placoids, the lower insert showing ventral teeth of the third band (of the same individual) whereas the upper insert shows ventral placoids (of the same individual), and empty indented arrowhead indicates second band of teeth whereas empty arrowheads indicate third band of teeth in the oral cavity. Figure 2 was assembled from several photos. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 1 in The first record of Macrobiotus vladimiri Bertolani, Biserov, Rebecchi & Cesari, 2011 (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 1. Macrobiotus vladimiri Bertolani, Biserov, Rebecchi & Cesari, 2011 from the Polish population A- habitus (PCM) dorsoventral projection; B- cuticular pores on the posterior part of the body indicated by empty arrowhead; C- granulation on leg II; D- granulation on leg IV. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 9 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 9. Macrobiotus joannae Pilato & Binda, 1983 – details of animal morphology (paratypes): A–B – buccal tube with oral cavity armature and pharyngeal bulb with placoids seen in PCM respectively; C–D – granulation on the dorsolateral cuticle in the middle of the body and on the dorsal cuticle in the caudal region respectively; E–F – claws and granulation on the II and IV pair of legs, respectively. Filled arrowheads indicate granulation on the dorsolateral cuticle, empty arrowheads indicate leg granulations. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 7 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 7. Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. – egg chorion morphology seen in SEM: A – entire egg with faintly visible reticulation on the surface between processes; B–D – details of reticulation and processes arrangement on the egg surface; E–F – zoom on a single egg process and terminal disc respectively. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 6 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 6. Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. – egg seen in PCM: A – midsection under 400× magnification; B – surface under 400× magnification; C – midsection, to show processes, under 1000× magnification; D – surfaces under 1000× magnification. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 4 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 4. Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. – the oral cavity armature of a single paratype seen in SEM from different angles, A – dorsal side; B – ventral side. Filled indented arrowheads indicate teeth of the first band, empty indented arrowheads indicate teeth of the second band, the ridges of the third band are marked with "M" (median tooth) and "L" (lateral teeth). Scale bars in µm.
Figure 5 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 5. Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. – claws: A–B – claws II (holotype) and IV (paratype) seen in PCM, with smooth and slightly dentate lunules respectively; C–D – claws I and IV seen in SEM, with smooth and slightly dentate lunules respectively. Filled flat arrowhead indicates a cuticular bar, filled indented arrowhead indicates indentation in lunules IV, empty arrowhead indicates the horseshoe structure connecting the anterior and the posterior claw. Scale bars in µm.
Figure 10 in An integrative description of Macrobiotus hannae sp. nov. (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae: hufelandi group) from Poland
Figure 10. Macrobiotus joannae Pilato & Binda, 1983 – details of the egg: A – surfaces under 1000× magnification seen in PCM; B – surface under 1000× magnification seen in DIC. Scale bars in µm.
Fig. 5. Comparison between M in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 5. Comparison between M. azzunae sp. nov. and M. sandrae Bertolani & Rebecchi, 1993. A. Placoids in M. azzunae sp. nov., paratype (UNIMORE, slide C4218–S30). B. Placoids in M. sandrae (UNIMORE, slide C442–S79); arrowheads evidence the different constriction depth of the first macroplacoid. C. Eggshell in M. azzunae sp. nov., paratype (UNIMORE, slide C4218–S4). D. Eggshell in M. sandrae (UNIMORE, slide C2346–S2); in M. azzunae sp. nov. there are smaller processes and reticulation with thinner wires and larger net around the processes than in M. sandrae. A–D: PhC.
Fig. 3 in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 3. Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov., paratypes. A. In toto animal. B–D. Cuticular pores. E. Fourth pair of legs with smooth lunules and peculiar granulation on the legs. F. Granulation on the legs with a starshaped organization. G. Male with testis full of mature spermatozoa with elongate, helicoidal nucleus. A, D–F: SEM (stub-C4218); B: in vivo DIC; C, G: orcein (not permanent slide TN02–04) PhC.
Fig. 7 in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 7. Left: tree resulting from both the maximum likelihood analysis and the Bayesian inference of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) in M. azzunae sp. nov. specimens and sequences from GenBank. Values above branches point out bootstrap values, while values under branches represent posterior probability values. Results of the Poisson tree process analysis are provided using differently coloured branches: putative species are indicated using transitions from blue-coloured branches to red-coloured branches. Newly scored haplotypes are in bold. The scale bar shows the number of substitutions per nucleotide position. Centre: haplotype network of COI gene in M. hufelandi complex. Circles represent haplotypes, while circle surface denotes haplotype frequency. Networks falling below the value of the 95% connection limit are disconnected. Right: rectangles denote specimens grouped by ABGD analysis.
Fig. 2 in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 2. Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov., holotype (UNIMORE, slide C4218–S32). A. In toto animal. B. Cuticular pores and leg granulation (arrow) on the hind legs. C. Buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. D. Buccal armature: dorsal crests (arrow). E. Buccal armature: ventral crests (arrow). F. Claw and lunulae of the third pair of legs. G. Claw and lunulae of the fourth pair of legs. A–G: PhC.
Fig. 4 in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 4. Egg of Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov., paratype (UNIMORE, slide C4218–S11). A. In toto egg with buccal-pharyngeal apparatus of its embryo at the end of development. B. Processes of the eggshell (midsection). C. Distal discs of the eggshell processes. D. Surface of the eggshell between processes. A, C–D: PhC; B: DIC.
Fig. 6. Macrobiotus personatus Biserov, 1990 in Integrative description of a new Tunisian tardigrade species, Macrobiotus azzunae sp. nov. (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, hufelandi group)
Fig. 6. Macrobiotus personatus Biserov, 1990, paratypes (Civic Museum of Natural History of Verona, Italy, CT14701). A. Buccal-pharyngeal apparatus with macroplacoids. B. Pores on the cuticle. C. Eggshell reticulation and egg processes. D. Egg processes. A–D: PhC.
Figure 3 in Four new species of the Diphascon nobilei group (Eutardigrada, Hypsibiidae)
Figure 3. Diphascon (D.) nelsonae sp. n. (A) Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus; (B) claws of the second pair of legs; (C) claws of the fourth pair of legs. Scale bar: 10 Mm.
Figure 5 in Four new species of the Diphascon nobilei group (Eutardigrada, Hypsibiidae)
Figure 5. Diphascon (D.) hydrophilum sp. n. (A) Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus; (B) internal claw of the second pair of legs; (C) external claw of the second pair of legs; (D) claws of the second pair of legs of a paratype; (E) claws of the fourth pair of legs. Scale bar: 10 Mm.
Figure 4 in Four new species of the Diphascon nobilei group (Eutardigrada, Hypsibiidae)
Figure 4. Diphascon (D.) platyungue sp. n. (A) Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus; (B) claws of the third pair of legs; (C) claws of the fourth pair of legs; (D) claws of the second pair of legs of a paratype. Scale bar: 10 Mm.
Figure 2 in Four new species of the Diphascon nobilei group (Eutardigrada, Hypsibiidae)
Figure 2. Diphascon (D.) serratum sp. n. (A) Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus; (B) claws of the third pair of legs; (C) claws of the fourth pair of legs. Scale bar: 10 Mm.
Figure 5 in Observations on the ''tenuis group'' (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae) and description of a new Macrobiotus species
Figure 5. Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus (arrows indicate large dorsal tooth). (A) Macrobiotus hyperonyx, lateral view (paratype); (B) M. ariekammensis, lateral view; (C) M. hyperonyx, dorsal view (paratype); (D) M. ariekammensis, dorsal view; (E, F) M. caelicola (paratypes): (E) dorsal view; (F) lateral view. (A, C) Phase contrast microscopy; (B, D–F) differential interference contrast microscopy. Scale bars: 7 mm.
Figure 4 in Observations on the ''tenuis group'' (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae) and description of a new Macrobiotus species
Figure 4. Claws. (A) Macrobiotus ciprianoi (paratype; third claws); (B) M. willardi (paratype; first claws); (C) M. ariekammensis (second claws); (D) M. hyperonyx (paratype; second claws); (E) M. hystricogenitus (holotype; first claws); (F) M. caelicola (paratype; third claws); (G) M. higginsi (holotype; second claws). (H) M. tenuis (second claws); (I) M. mongolicus (holotype; second claws); (J) M. bondavallii (holotype; second claws). (A, B, D–J) Phase contrast microscopy; (C) differential interference contrast microscopy. Scale bars: 10 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.