Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

192

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

192 results for “Software Enginering”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo24/100

Can a Chatbot Support Software Engineers with Load Testing? Approach and Experiences

<p>Supplementary material for the paper:</p> <p>Dusan Okanovic, Samuel Beck, Lasse Merz, Christoph Zorn, Leonel Merino, Andre van Hoorn, and Fabian Beck. Can a chatbot support software engineers with load testing? Approach and experiences. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE 2020), 2020. <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3358960.3375792">https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3358960.3375792</a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →
zenodo24/100

The Lack of Shared Understanding of Non-Functional Requirements in Continuous Software Engineering: Accidental or Essential?

<p>Study Information</p> <p>We conducted a case study of three small organizations scaling up continuous software engineering to further understand and identify factors that contribute to lack of shared understanding of non-functional requirements (NFRs), and its relationship to rework. To conceptualize lack of shared understanding of NFRs we traced it to rework development tasks. Seeking to shed light on the complex relationship between shared understanding, rework, and CSE, our study examined forty-one NFR-related development tasks identified as rework and was driven by the following research questions:</p> <ol> <li>What contributes to lack of shared understanding of NFRs?</li> <li>Which NFRs are most associated with a lack of shared understanding?</li> <li>What amount of a lack of shared understanding of&nbsp;NFRs is accidental&nbsp;versus essential?</li> </ol> <p>To answer our research questions, we conducted a multi-case study using a mixed-methods approach&nbsp;in collaboration with three independent organizations using qualitative and immersive techniques.&nbsp;For this study our organizations are referred to as Alpha, Beta, and Gamma. We performed a preliminary study of each organization to build a context for each organization. We then collected data from project task management repositories and analyzed the tasks to uncover 41 NFR-related software development tasks as rework due to a lack of shared understanding of NFRs.</p> <p>Data Analysis</p> <p>We performed qualitative analysis through focus groups at each organization. We used an open-coding [1]&nbsp;approach to develop a purely inductive codebook,&nbsp;which minimizes a coder&#39;s ability to force a bias of any particular hypothesis.&nbsp;In the initial coding phase, a transcript was independently coded by two coders, after which an agreement session was held to discuss the codes, consolidate the codebook, and to calculate Cohen&#39;s kappa coefficient (using&nbsp;sklearn.metrics cohen_kappa_score). We continued coding in pairs until our inter-rater reliability met substantial agreement. After which we individually coded the remaining transcripts followed by an expert rater reviewer.</p> <p>This data represents two artifacts from our research in evaluating the complex relationship between shared understanding, non-functional requirements, continuous software engineering, and rework. It includes the resulting thematic synthesis&nbsp;codebook and inter-rater kappa values.</p> <p>Artifact Descriptions</p> <p>Our replication package contains two artifacts:<br> 1. Codebook.csv: The codebook itself contains a row for each code used (48 in total), including the code name,&nbsp;a brief description of the code, which round of coding that code was introduced, the total number of tasks that code appeared in (at least once), the number of tasks that code appeared in for each organization (Alpha, Beta, and Gamma), the total number of occurrences across all tasks, the number of occurrences across across each organization (Alpha, Beta, and Gamma), and the number of occurrences for each task.</p> <p>For example, the code &#39;BusinessContext&#39;&nbsp;was used when &#39;Talking about information from the business side of the organization&#39; and appeared in the first transcript we coded (1). The &#39;BusinessContext&#39; code appeared in 19/41 tasks (10 at Alpha, 8 at Beta, and 1 at Gamma). Furthermore, the &#39;BusinessContext&#39; code was used a total of 72 times (43 at Alpha, 22 at Beta, and 7 at Gamma). The remaining 41 columns&nbsp;represent the number of occurrences for each task, e.g. it appeared 3 times in task A-2 (Alpha&#39;s second task).</p> <p>2. kappa-values.csv: Contains the interview rounds (in order of coding) and the associated kappa values calculated for our inter-rater coding agreement.</p> <p>Usefulness</p> <p>While we recognize that the value and usefulness of our replication package is yet to-be-determined, in the interest of transparency of open science we published our artifacts. In light of this, we hope that these artifacts are useful to either replicate our findings or to further analyze to produce other enlightening results.</p> <p>References</p> <ol> <li>J. M. Corbin and A. Strauss, &ldquo;Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria,&rdquo;Qualitative sociology, vol. 13,&nbsp;no. 1,pp. 3&ndash;21, 1990.</li> </ol>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →
zenodo24/100

A Comparison of Natural Language Understanding Platforms for Chatbots in Software Engineering

<p>The file contains the training dataset used in our study. And, it includes the results of all NLUs for both tasks.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →
zenodo24/100

Acceptance Behavior Theories and Models in Software Engineering

<p><strong>Electronic supplement for a mapping study on acceptance behavior theories and models in SE</strong></p> <p>Please refer to the following paper when you cite/use this data:</p> <p>J&uuml;rgen B&ouml;rstler, Nauman bin Ali, Kai Petersen, Emelie Engstr&ouml;m (2024).<br>Acceptance behavior theories and models in software engineering &mdash; A mapping study.<br><em>Information and Software Technology</em>.<br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107469</p> <p><strong>Overview of the electronic supplement</strong></p> <ol> <li>An overview-file (README.docx) comprising the following: <ol> <li>An overview of the supplements.</li> <li>A plain list of the theories and models of acceptance behavior used for constructing the search string.</li> <li>A plain list of the software engineering venues used for constructing the search string.</li> <li>A ready-to-use search string for Scopus (plain text).</li> <li>A plain list of the 47 included primary studies.</li> </ol> </li> <li>A separate Bibtex-file (p1-p47.bib) with all 47 included primary studies.</li> <li>A separate Excel-file (data extraction.xlsx) comprising the following sheets: <ol> <li>The data extracted for the 47 included primary studies.</li> <li>The 27 primary studies excluded during full-text reading and data extraction.</li> </ol> </li> </ol>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Heidelberg Engineering ANTERION Software Comparison Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06657716. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

The Heidelberg Engineering ANTERION Software Comparison Precision and Agreement Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06397976. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
zenodo20/100

A Comparison of Natural Language Understanding Platforms for Chatbots in Software Engineering

<p>The used dataset for training the NLUs and the results of each NLU from both tasks.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →
zenodo20/100

A Comparison of Natural Language Understanding Platforms for Chatbots in Software Engineering

<p>The dataset used to train&nbsp;the NLUs, and the results of each NLU from both tasks.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →
zenodo20/100

Flipped Classroom in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study

<p>V&iacute;deo (backup)&nbsp;para apresenta&ccedil;&atilde;o de conting&ecirc;ncia</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo20/100

Raw Data for Empirical Software Engineering

<p>The ZIP archive contains the raw data of measurement results&nbsp; for each guideline.</p>

openMar 2024View details →
zenodo16/100

Interview Study About Coursework Consultation Sessions with GitLab Metrics in a Software Engineering Course

<p>This data repository is created to share materials used in an interview study about coursework consultation sessions with GitLab Metrics in a software engineering course, and selected quotations with their corresponding themes.</p>

restrictedOct 2019View details →
zenodo16/100

Classifying Open-Source Pre-Trained Models and Datasets for Software Engineering

<p>The replication package for the short paper titled 'Classifying Open-Source Pre-Trained Models and Datasets for Software Engineering' is provided. It includes a README file and accompanying scripts with comprehensive instructions to facilitate the replication of the analysis presented in the paper.</p>

openNov 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record