Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
325
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
325 results for “molecular phylogenetic analysis”
FIGURE 5 in Two newly recorded invasive alien ascidians (Chordata, Tunicata, Ascidiacea) based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis in Korea*
FIGURE 5. Molgula manhattensis: A, C, Individuals densely aggregated on a rope; B, Individuals on a fish trap; D, Right side; E, Left side; F, Sagittal section of branchial sac; G, Oral and Atrial siphon; H, Tentacles; I, Dorsal tubercle; J, Six folds of branchial sac; K, Stigmata; L, Individuals attached to fish trap. 1—oral siphon, 2—atrial siphon, 3—tentacles, 4—dorsal tubercle, 5—folds of branchial sac, 6—stigmata, 7—intestine, 8—gonads, 9—renal sac, 10—tunic, 11—endostyle. Scale bars: A–B. 50 mm; C–F, L. 5 mm; G–K. 1 mm.
FIGURE 2 in Two newly recorded invasive alien ascidians (Chordata, Tunicata, Ascidiacea) based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis in Korea*
FIGURE 2. Five invasive alien ascidians at four collection sites in Korea: A, C. lepadiformis attached to dock wall at 4.7 m depth in Busan port; B, A. aspersa attached to ropes at Tongyeong yacht marina; C, C. intestinalis attached on thick cloth at Gampo harbor; D, M. manhattensis attached on floating buoy at Mokpo yacht marina; E, S. plicata attached to rope at Tongyeong yacht marina. Scale bars: A–E. 10 cm.
FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic consensus tree among hermit crab species obtained from a in Molecular analysis validates of some informal morphological groups of Pagurus (Fabricius, 1775) (Anomura: Paguridae) from South America
FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic consensus tree among hermit crab species obtained from a fragment of Histone H3 (nDNA), inferred from Maximum Likelihood (ML) Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) analysis. Topology of a ML is presented, with bootstrap values shown from left to right are for ML, MP and NJ respectively. Support numbers ≤ 50% are shown.
Figure 6 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Amiota apodemata and Amiota sinuata species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with descriptions of four new species
Figure 6. Neighbour-joining tree deduced from the ND2 sequences. Numbers above the branches show the bootstrap percentages of the nodes with the Tamura–Nei model and gamma-distributed rates.
Figure 5 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Amiota apodemata and Amiota sinuata species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with descriptions of four new species
Figure 5. Bayesian tree deduced from the ND2 sequences. Numbers above the branches show the bootstrap percentages of the nodes in the maximum parsimony analysis (tree length = 758 steps; consitency index, CI = 0.6609; retention index, RI = 0.8075), numbers below the branches indicate the posterior probabilities (PPs; –ln L = 4842.26).
Figure 2 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Amiota apodemata and Amiota sinuata species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with descriptions of four new species
Figure 2. Amiota guiensis Xu & Chen sp. nov., male terminalia: A, epandrium and cercus; B, surstylus; C, D, hypandrium (hypd), parameres (pm), gonopods (gon; pr, arcuate basal process), aedeagus (aed), and aedeagal apodeme (aed a) (ventral and lateral view). Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figure 1 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Amiota apodemata and Amiota sinuata species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with descriptions of four new species
Figure 1. Amiota reikae Xu & Chen sp. nov., male terminalia: A, epandrium and cercus; B, surstylus; C, D, hypandrium (hypd), parameres (pm), gonopods (gon; pr, arcuate basal process), aedeagus (aed), and aedeagal apodeme (aed a) (ventral and lateral view). Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figure 4 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Amiota apodemata and Amiota sinuata species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with descriptions of four new species
Figure 4. Amiota polytreta Xu & Chen sp. nov., male terminalia: A, epandrium and cercus; B, surstylus; C, D, hypandrium (hypd), parameres (pm), gonopods (gon; pr, arcuate basal process), aedeagus (aed), and aedeagal apodeme (aed a) (ventral and lateral view). Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
FIGURE 3 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a known and a new hydrothermal vent octopod: their relationships with the genus Benthoctopus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae)
FIGURE 3. Maximum likelihood tree depicting the phylogenetic relationship of 14 species (15 individuals) of Octopodidae. The analysis employed a portion of the mitochondrial gene, 12S rDNA. Bayesian posterior probability support values are indicated below the nodes and maximum likelihood bootstrap values with 50% support or greater are indicated above the nodes.
FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a known and a new hydrothermal vent octopod: their relationships with the genus Benthoctopus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae)
FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood tree depicting the phylogenetic relationship of 13 species (14 individuals) of Octopodidae. The analysis employed a portion of four mitochondrial genes (12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, COIII, cyt b) and a portion of the nuclear gene rhodopsin. Bayesian posterior probability support values are indicated below the nodes and maximum likelihood bootstrap values with 50% support or greater are indicated above the nodes.
FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a known and a new hydrothermal vent octopod: their relationships with the genus Benthoctopus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae)
FIGURE 1. The Manus Vent octopus specimen (FMNH 310455) in situ near a hydrothermal vent in the Manus Basin off Papua New Guinea, 1500 m depth.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree resulting from a in Host specialization and species diversity in the genus Stylops (Strepsiptera: Stylopidae), revealed by molecular phylogenetic analysis
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree resulting from a Bayesian analysis of the partial sequence from the mitochondrial NADH gene. The names of the host Andrena bees are indicated with every Stylops voucher number. The posterior probabilities are given before the slash; the bootstrap values from the maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis are given after the slash. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9, and bootstrap values lower than 50, are considered as unsupported and are thus replaced by an asterisk (*); incongruent nodes between the two analyses are indicated by a dash (-). Branch support is omitted at the nodes that were unsupported in both the Bayesian and the ML analyses.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree resulting from a in Host specialization and species diversity in the genus Stylops (Strepsiptera: Stylopidae), revealed by molecular phylogenetic analysis
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree resulting from a Bayesian analysis of the partial sequence from the nuclear EF1 gene. Names of host Andrena bees are indicated at every Stylops voucher number. The names of the host Andrena bees are indicated with every Stylops voucher number. The posterior probabilities are given before the slash; the bootstrap values from the maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis are given after the slash. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9, and bootstrap values lower than 50, are considered as unsupported and thus replaced by an asterisk (*); incongruent nodes between the two analyses are indicated by a dash (-). Branch support is omitted at the nodes that were unsupported in both the Bayesian and the ML analyses.
Figure 3 in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin
Figure 3. Novomitchellia bursaelongata Harrath, Sluys & Riutort, sp. nov. A, holotype. Microphotograph of sagittal section of the pharynx; musculature composed of subepithelial layer of circular fibres, followed by a layer of longitudinal fibres (arrowhead), and outer subepithelial layer of circular muscle (arrow). B, paratype V.Pl. 7225.3. Sagittal section showing the numerous, dorsal testes (arrowheads). C, holotype. Sagittal section showing ventral position of ovary and oviduct, above the ventral nerve cord. D, photomicrograph of the copulatory apparatus of the holotype in sagittal section; large arrow indicates direction of head. E, sagittal section of the copulatory apparatus of the holotype showing connection between common oviduct and bursal canal; large arrow indicates direction of head. Abbreviations: A, atrium; BC, bursal canal; CB, copulatory bursa; CM, circular muscle; COD, common oviduct; DS, dorsal side; ED, ejaculatory duct; G, gonopore; L, lumen; OD, oviduct; OV, oviduct; PP, penis papilla; SV, seminal vesicle; VD, vas deferens; VNC, ventral nerve cord; VS, ventral side. Scale bars = 200 µm.
Figure 1. Bayesian tree inferred from the 18S in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin
Figure 1. Bayesian tree inferred from the 18S rDNA sequences showing the relationship of the new Novomitchellia species to other Tricladida species included in this analysis. Maximum likelihood (ML) yielded the same topology. Asterisks at nodes indicate posterior probabilities = 1/bootstrap values> 75% obtained respectively in the ML and Bayesian inference analyses. Scale bar: number of substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 4 in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin
Figure 4. Novomitchellia bursaelongata Harrath, Sluys & Riutort, sp. nov. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus of the holotype. Abbreviations: A, atrium; BC, bursal canal; CB, copulatory bursa; COD, common oviduct; G, gonopore; GL, glands; M, mouth; OD, oviduct; PB, penis bulb; PH, pharynx; PP, penis papilla; VD, vas deferens. Scale bar = 150 µm.
Figure 2 in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin
Figure 2. Novomitchellia bursaelongata Harrath, Sluys & Riutort, sp. nov. Holotype. A, photograph of preserved specimen in dorsal view; some protuberances are seen on the head (arrowheads); arrow indicates the tail (T). B, photograph of preserved specimen in ventral view; arrow indicates the pharynx (PH). Scale bars not available.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic analysis of the predatory plant bug subfamily Deraeocorinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) based on molecular and morphological data
Figure 4. Model-based phylogenies based on the molecular-only dataset for 51 taxa. A, Bayesian inference tree using MRBAYES; B, maximum likelihood tree using RAxML. Nodal support of PP> 0.5 or BS> 50 displayed as circular and square symbols, respectively.
Figure 7 in Phylogenetic analysis of the predatory plant bug subfamily Deraeocorinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) based on molecular and morphological data
Figure 7. IW parsimonious tree with K = 9 for 69 taxa, for the combined dataset computed with TNT. Mapped characters refer to unambiguous changes (referred to in the Results and Discussion sections). Filled circles represent synapomorphies and open circles represent homoplasies. Numbers above branches represent jack-knife frequencies (JK) (left) and symmetric resampling values (SR) (right). Numbers below branches represent Bremer support values (BR). Filled stars refer to nodal support of 100. Nodal support of BR> 2 or JK/SR> 50 displayed. Squares indicate the support values on major nodes, and the slash in the square indicates an unsupported clade. Red circle refers to the fossil species Amberderaeous gigophthalmus. Images in the black rectangle (top right) represent the subfamilies used: (a) Cylapinae; (b) Bryocorinae: Monaloniini; (c) Orthotylinae; (d) Bryocorinae: Dicyphini; (e) Phylinae.
Figure 2. Non-genitalic morphological character states. A in Phylogenetic analysis of the predatory plant bug subfamily Deraeocorinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) based on molecular and morphological data
Figure 2. Non-genitalic morphological character states. A, Deraeocoris oliƲaceus; B, Stethoconus japonicus; C, Deraeocoris sp.; D, Termatophylum hikosanum; E, Bothynotus pilosus; F, Bothynotus sp. in ventral view; G, Saturniomiris lugens (Chan & Cassis, 2020); H, Surinamella doesburgi (from Ferreira et al., 2015); I, Eustictus grossus; J, Amberderaeous gigophthalmus in amber. Scale bars: 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.