Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
291
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
291 results for “monophyletic”
Figures 46–48 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 46–48. Wing venation and associated characters: 46, Geyeria decussata (Godart, [1824]); 47, Imara pallasia (Eschscholtz, 1821); 48, Yagra fonscolombe (Godart, [1824]). Scale bars: 1 cm.
Figures 40–45 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 40–45. Antennae: 40, Morpheis clenchi Donahue, 1980; 41, Ceretes marcelserres (Godart, [1824]); 42, Synemon parthenoides R. Felder, 1874; 43, Castnia invaria Walker, 1854; 44, Geyeria decussata (Godart, [1824]); 45, Prometheus heliconioides (Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]) comb. nov. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 39 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figure 39. Cladogram obtained from analysis using weighting (k = 20), including Tascina metallica Pagenstecher, 1890. Filled circles represent synapomorphies; open circles represent homoplasies. The numbers represent the values of Bremer support for the branches. Clades with heavier lines represent the new genera proposed. Coloured branches represent the appearance of a mimetic pattern. Asterisks next to taxa names represent species of uncertain position.
Figure 38 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figure 38. Cladogram obtained from analysis using weighting (k = 20), not including Tascina metallica Pagenstecher, 1890. Filled circles represent synapomorphies; open circles represent homoplasies. Asterisks next to taxa names represent species of uncertain position.
Figure 37 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figure 37. Cladograms obtained from unweighted analyses: A, cladogram including Tascina metallica Pagenstecher, 1890, from Oriental fauna; B, cladogram without Tascina metallica Pagenstecher, 1890.
Figures 73–80 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 73–80. Valva and associated characters, internal view: 73, Yagra fonscolombe (Godart, [1824]); 74, Athis flavimaculata (Miller, 1972); 75, Imara satrapes (Kollar, 1839); 76, Synpalamides phalaris (Fabricius, 1793); 77, Castnius pelasgus (Cramer, [1779]); 78, Telchin evalthe (Fabricius, 1775) comb. nov. 79, Synpalamides ctesiphon (Hübner, [1820]) comb. nov.; 80, Eupalamides cyparissias (Fabricius, 1776). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figures 65–72 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 65–72. Aedeagus and associated characters, lateral view: 65, Imara pallasia (Eschscholtz, 1821); 66, Eupalamides cyparissias (Fabricius, 1776); 67, Telchin evalthe (Fabricius, 1775) comb. nov.; 68, Yagra fonscolombe (Godart, [1824]); 69, Corybantes pylades (Stoll, 1782); 70, Telchin atymnius (Dalman, 1824); 71, Synpalamides ctesiphon (Hübner, [1820]) comb. nov. 72, Telchin syphax (Fabricius, 1775). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figures 53–58 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 53–58. Aedeagus and associated characters, lateral view: 53, Morpheis clenchi Donahue, 1980; 54, Synemon parthenoides R. Felder, 1874; 55, Ceretes thais (Drury, 1782); 56, Castnius pelasgus (Cramer, [1779]); 57, Synpalamides orestes (Walker, 1854); 58, Prometheus heliconioides (Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]) comb. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figures 59–64 in Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera
Figures 59–64. Posterior end of aedeagus and associated characters, lateral view: 59, Imara pallasia (Eschscholtz, 1821); 60, Prometheus mimica (R. Felder, 1874) comb. nov.; 61, Synpalamides hegemon (Kollar, 1839) comb. nov.; 62, Corybantes mathani (Oberthür, 1881); 63, Synpalamides phalaris (Fabricius, 1793); 64, Telchin licus (Drury, 1773). Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 23 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 23. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀: A–B) (♂: C): A, female, abdomen, ventral; B, P5, anterior; C, urosome, ventral.
FIGURE 21 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 21. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀: A–B) (♂: C): A, P1, anterior; B, P2, anterior; C, P2 endopod, anterior.
FIGURE 22 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 22. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀: A–D) (♂: E): A, P3 exopod, anterior: B, P4 exopod, anterior; C, P3 endopod, anterior; D, P4 endopod, anterior; E, P3 endopod, anterior.
FIGURE 20 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 20. Lourinia aldabraensis sp. nov. (♀): A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, lateral; C, antenna, lateral; D, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal.
FIGURE 19 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 19. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♂): A, habitus, ventral; B, antennule and rostrum, ventral; C, antennule, segment 6, ventral; D, Abdomen, ventral.
FIGURE 17 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 17. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♀: A) (♂: B–D): A, abdomen, ventral; B, urosome, ventral; C, P5, anterior; D, P6, anterior.
FIGURE 18 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 18. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♀): A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, lateral; D, P5 exopod, lateral; E, anal operculum and caudal rami, dorsal; D, caudal ramus, lateral.
FIGURE 16 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 16. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♂): A, habitus, dorsal; B, antennule, ventrolateral (armature elements not shown on segments 3–6); C, antennule, segments 2–5, lateral; D, antennule, segments 5–8, lateral.
FIGURE 15 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 15. Lourinia gocmeni sp. nov. (♀: A–E) (♂: F–G): A, P3 exopod, anterior; B, P4 exopod, anterior; C, P3 endopod, anterior; D, abnormal form of second endopod of P3, anterior; E, P4 endopod, anterior; F, P3 endopod, anterior; G, P4 endopod, anterior.
FIGURE 6 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 6. Lourinia wellsi sp. nov. (♀): A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, lateral; C, rostrum, dorsal; D, caudal ramus, dorsal; E, caudal ramus, ventral; F, caudal ramus, lateral.
FIGURE 10 in Resolving the Lourinia armata (Claus, 1866) complex with remarks on the monophyletic status of Louriniidae, Monard 1927 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)
FIGURE 10. Lourinia wellsi sp. nov. (♂): A, habitus, dorsal; B, antennule, ventral; C, antennule segments 3–4, dorsal; D, antennule, segments 5–8, dorsal; E, antennules, segments 6–9, dorsal; F, antennule, segment 9, dorsal.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.