Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
195
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
195 results for “pressure ulcers”
Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of Melatonin in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06421454. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
The Effect of an Electronic Decision Support System on Preventing Pressure Ulcers and Urinary Infectionsin Home Care
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06927479. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Peri-operative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pressure Ulcer in Surgical Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02279355. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Study of TurnCare's Q-2 System on the Sacral Pressure Ulcer Prevention in High Risk Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03107143. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
The Effect of Photobiomodulation on Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07307885. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Study Evaluating AutoloGel Therapy for Complete Closure of Wagner Grade 1-4 Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Leg Ulcers and Stage II-IV Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02248077. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Reference Nurse Program for Pressure Ulcers in Primary Care
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01877681. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial of Immediate Flap Closure Versus Wound Care for Management of Late-stage Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02272881. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Phage Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04815798. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Prevention of Bacteremia Induced by Debridement of Pressure Ulcer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00269100. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Predictors of Skin Temperature, Plantar Pressure and Ulceration in Diabetic Foot Patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03254095. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Efficacy of a Polyhexanide Biguanide-Based Gel in the Prevention of Biofilm Formation in Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07391748. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
HP011-101, HP828-101, and Standard Care for Pressure Ulcers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01273428. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Transcriptional programming of human epidermis during wound repair and in pressure ulcer at single-cell resolution
GEO Series GSE137897. Homo sapiens. 1170 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Data set from Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, Baroni I, Conte G, Turrini F, Castiello G, Magon A, Pittella F, Caruso R. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3177-3188. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14875. Epub 2019 Apr 21. PMID: 30938908.
<p>Data set from Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, Baroni I, Conte G, Turrini F, Castiello G, Magon A, Pittella F, Caruso R. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3177-3188. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14875. Epub 2019 Apr 21. PMID: 30938908</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a current issue for healthcare delivery. Nurse self-efficacy in managing PUs could predict patients' outcome, being a proxy assessment of their overall competency to managing PUs. However, a valid and reliable scale of this task-specific self-efficacy has not yet been developed.</p> <p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses' self-efficacy in managing PUs, that is, the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses (PUM-SES).</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a multi-method and multi-phase design, where study reporting was supported by the STROBE checklist (File S1). Phase 1 referred to the scale development, consisting in the items' generation, mainly based on themes emerged from the literature and discussed within a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on a three-step validation process: the first step aimed to assess face and content validity of the pool of items previously generated (initial version of the PUM-SES); the second aimed to assess psychometrics properties through exploratory factorial analysis; the third step assessed construct validity through confirmative factorial analysis, while concurrent validity was evaluated describing the relationships between PUM-SES and an established general self-efficacy measurement. Reliability was assessed through the evaluation of stability and internal consistency.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>PUM-SES showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, internal consistency and stability. Specifically, PUM-SES had four domains, labelled as follows: assessment, planning, supervision and decision-making. These domains were predicted by the same second-order factor, labelled as PU management self-efficacy.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PUM-SES is a 10-item scale to measure nurses' self-efficacy in PU management. A standardised 0-100 scoring is suggested for computing each domain and the overall scale. PUM-SES might be used in clinical and educational research.</p> <p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Optimising nurses' self-efficacy in PU management might enhance clinical assessment, determining better outcomes in patients with PUs.</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.