Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in Phylogeny and biogeography of African Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), with emphasis on endemic species of the great East African lakes

Figure 4. Biogeographical hypothesis of the evolutionary history of the African Biomphalaria species. A, Pliocene– Pleistocene dispersal of a Biomphalaria glabrata-like snail into western Africa where the ancestral African Biomphalaria evolved, probably similar to Biomphalaria camerunensis/Biomphalaria pfeifferi. B. pfeifferi colonized most of the sub- Saharan continent. The ancestral African Biomphalaria or a B. camerunensis/B. pfeifferi-like stock migrated to East Africa and evolved into a Biomphalaria angulosa-like species, which is ancestral to the choanomphala-group snails. Within this species group the Ugandan Biomphalaria sudanica and Biomphalaria alexandrina evolved with B. alexandrina subsequently migrating along the River Nile to eastern North Africa. The river Nile and the surrounding region is indicated in the small inset.

Figure 18 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 18. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part G. Neornithes: Piciformes, and Passeriformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 15 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 15. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part D. Neornithes: Gruiformes and Charadriiformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 11 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 11. Simplified summary tree for uppermost, supraordinal ranks of avian classification. Dashed internodes correspond to marginally supported clades. For complete classification, see Appendix 1.

Figure 14 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 14. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part C. Neornithes: nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 6 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), VI. A, Van Tuinen et al. (2000); B, Van Tuinen et al. (2001).

Figure 5 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 5. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), V. A, Espinosa de los Monteros (2000); B, Johansson et al. (2001).

Figure 4 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 4. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), IV. A, Sibley & Ahlquist (1990: figs 354–356), simplified to orders, wherein parenthetical 'para' indicates paraphyly of sampled members, and 'aug' indicates unconventional content; B, Mindell et al. (1997).

Figure 2 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 2. Morphological phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), II. A, Mayr & Clarke (2003); B, Bourdon et al. (2005).

Figure 10 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 10. Ordinal-level strict consensus tree for orders of Neornithes based on 2954 morphological characters, indicating delimitations of segments detailed in Figures 12–18.

Figure 1 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 1. Morphological phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies, I. A, Cracraft (1988); B, Mayr et al. (2003). Some trees were subjected to topologically neutral modifications of taxa to facilitate comparisons (also Figs 2–9). See corresponding papers for analytical methods and topological statistics.

Figure 3 in Phylogeny and biogeography of African Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), with emphasis on endemic species of the great East African lakes

Figure 3. Consensus cladogram resulting from the parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses of the combined matrix (16S, cytochrome oxidase subunit I, COI, and internal transcribed spacer I, ITS1). maximum-parsimony (MP) bootstrap values greater than 50% are positioned below the nodes, and the posterior probabilities from the Bayesian inference analysis are placed above the nodes. Species icons represent the typical morphology of the species. Species without country nomination are from Uganda. The 'Nilotic species complex' first inferred by DeJong et al. (2001) is indicated by the vertical bar. Note the basal position of Biomphalaria angulosa to the Nilotic species complex. The weak bootstrap support of this complex in the parsimony analysis is a result of the close phylogenetic relationship with B. angulosa.

Figure 13 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 13. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part B. Neornithes: Palaeognathae and Galloanserae. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 17 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 17. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part F. Neornithes: Columbiformes, Caprimulgiformes, Apodiformes, Coliiformes, Trogoniformes and Coraciiformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 7 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 7. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), VII. A, Paton et al. (2002); B, Sorenson et al. (2003).

Figure 3 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 3. Morphological phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), III. A, Mayr (2005b); B, Mayr (2005f: fig. 9), excluding fossils Prefica and Paraprefica.

Figure 16 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 16. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part E. Neornithes: Falconiformes, Strigiformes, Cuculiformes and Psittaciformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 2 in Phylogeny and biogeography of African Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), with emphasis on endemic species of the great East African lakes

Figure 2. Plots of transitions (TS) and transversions (TV) for Biomphalaria relative to the percentage sequence divergence (p-distance). The sliding window analysis for noncoding sequences and codon position for protein coding sequences are given in the insets. A, TS/TV plot of the partial sequence of the mitochondrial 16S gene. Regions with the most variation are identified in the sliding window analysis and correspond to loop regions in the secondary structure. B, TS/TV plot of the total internal transcribed spacer I (ITS1) gene that indicates a possible saturation. The sliding window analysis (inset) illustrates that the variation is not distributed uniformly across the sequence. C, TS/TV plot of the partial sequence of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI; primer pair LCO/HCO). The codon position plot is given in the inset. D, TS/TV plot of the partial sequence of COI (primer pair ASMIT 1/2). The codon position plot is given in the inset.

Figure A1 in Phylogeny and biogeography of African Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), with emphasis on endemic species of the great East African lakes

Figure A1. Cladograms resulting from maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) analyses of the combined matrix and parsimony analyses of single-gene cladograms. Bootstrap support is indicated at the nodes. A, Consensus cladogram inferred from weighted and unweighted 16S by MP. B, Cladogram inferred from internal transcribed spacer I (ITS1) by MP. C, Cladogram inferred from cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) by MP (primer pair LCO/HCO). D, Cladogram inferred from COI (primer pair ASMIT 1/2) by MP. E, Cladogram inferred from the combined data matrix by MP. F, Cladogram inferred from the combined data matrix by ML.

Figure 12 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 12. Detailed segments of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part A. Outgroup (non-neornithine) taxa. Nodes are labelled by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (numerator), and below by Bremer support indices (denominator).