Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 6 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 6. Partial map of South America indicating the distribution of M. australis. Red triangle indicates type-locality. Rio Paraguai basin = orange; upper Rio Paraná = violet; Rio Uruguai basin = light brown; Rio Madeira basin = blue.

FIGURE 4. Moenkhausia australis, LBP 9714, 51.1 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 4. Moenkhausia australis, LBP 9714, 51.1 mm SL. (a) Left maxilla (medial view); (b) left premaxilla (medial view); (c) left dentary (medial view). Scale bar 1 mm.

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 3. Moenkhausia australis: (a) MZUSP 59317, 40.7 mm SL, Rio Taboco, Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; (b) MCP 27464, 43.2 mm SL, Rio São Francisco, São Francisco de Assis, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; (c) LBP 9665, 37.5 mm SL, Córrego Azul, Ivinhema, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; (d) MZUSP 115631, 36.2 mm SL, Rio Guaporé, Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade, Mato Grosso, Brazil.

FIGURE 9 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 9. Relative frequencies of branched anal-fin rays for: (a) Moenkhausia australis (La Plata) and M. australis (Rio Madeira); (b) Moenkhausia forestii and M. australis (Rio Madeira); (c) Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Rio Parnaíba) and M. australis (Rio Madeira); (d) Moenkhausia oligolepis and M. australis (Rio Madeira).

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood method using the GTR model of nucleotide substitution and invariants for the data of COI gene. The numbers represent the groups frequencies observed using 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplicas. Values below 50% are not represented.

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 2. Moenkhausia australis (a) CAS 70818, lectotype, undetermined sex, 38.5 mm SL, Arroyo Trementina (= Rio Aquidaban in Concepcion, Paraguay); (b) CAS 70819, paralectotype, 30.7 mm SL, Arroyo Chagalalina (= Rio Aquidaban in Concepcion, Paraguay).

opennotspecifiedMar 2019View details →

Fig. 4 a Relationship between species age and latitude. b in Adrift across tectonic plates: molecular phylogenetics supports the ancient Laurasian origin of old limnic crangonyctid amphipods

Fig. 4 a Relationship between species age and latitude. b Box-plots indicating the age variation among eyeless, vestigial eyed, and eyed species in Crangonyctidae, Pseudocrangonyctidae, and Crymostygidae

opennotspecifiedMar 2019View details →

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships among 36 in Multigene fossil-calibrated analysis of the African lampeyes (Cyprinodontoidei: Procatopodidae) reveals an early Oligocene origin and Neogene diversification driven by palaeogeographic and palaeoclimatic events

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships among 36 species of Procatopodidae, including all genera but Aapticheilichthys, inferred by using partial sequences of the nuclear-encoded genes GLYT1, ENC1, RAG1, MYH6, and SREB2, a total of 5009 bp. Numbers left to the bar indicate posterior probability values and in the right are bootstrap support values taken from the maximum likelihood analysis. Asterisk means maximum values. The green dot next to species name refers to species occurring in rainforests, red dot refers to species occurring in savannahs, green/red dot refer to

Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 5 Microphotographs and line drawing of Isospora wiegmanniana n. sp. from Trogonophis wiegmanni wiegmanni. RB refractile body, SB stieda body, SSB substieda body, TS transversal septum in the wall, SR sporocyst residuum. Scale bars =10 μm

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 3 Microphotographs and line drawing of Isospora fahdi n. sp. from Acanthodactylus erythrurus belli. SB stieda body, SSB substieda body, SPR sporocyst residuum, SP sporozoite. Scale bars =10 μm

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 2 Microphotographs and line drawing of Isospora takydromi n. sp. from Takydromus sexlineatus. SB stieda body, SSB substieda body, SPR sporocyst residuum, RB refractile body, SP sporozoite. Scale bars =10 μm

Fig. 6 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 6 Phylogenetic tree derived from Bayesian inference using the GTR+I+G substitution model. This analysis consisted of two runs of four chains each, with 5,500,000 generations per run and a burn-in of 13,750 generations (41,250 trees for consensus tree). Support values less than 50 % are not shown, and these nodes were not collapsed into polytomies. Where two numbers are shown on the branch, the first one

Fig. 1 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 1 Infective stages of the different coccidian species found in the present study. All images were taken at the same magnification. a–g Exogenous oocysts of coccidian species included in the phylogeny. a Isospora tarentolae from Tarentola delalandii. b I. cf. tarentolae from Gallotia galloti. c Isospora abdallahi from Acanthodactylus boskianus. d Isospora amphiboluri from Pogona vitticeps. e Isospora albogulari from

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →

Fig. 10 Phylogenetic relationships among 14 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of the Neotropical butterfly genus Yphthimoides Forster (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): description of three new species based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 10 Phylogenetic relationships among 14 species of Yphthimoides based on DNA sequences of CoxI and obtained by a maximum likelihood analysis. Numbers below branches are bootstrap support

opennotspecifiedAug 2013View details →

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships among the 26 in A multigene phylogeny demonstrates that Tuber aestivum and Tuber uncinatum are conspecific

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships among the 26 Tuber aestivumuncinatum isolates inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) from the concatenated nine-gene data set (4,722 bp total). The same topology was obtained for both phylogenetic analyses after 1,000 bootstrap replicates for ML and 2,000,000 generations for BI using the GTR+G model for both analyses. The tree is rooted with T. macrosporum and T. magnatum (in italics). Only bootstrap values higher than 70 % (number above) and posterior probabilities higher than 0.95 (number below) are indicated. The two pre-assigned types T. aestivum and T. uncinatum are indicated by A (boldface) and U, respectively. The geographic origin is indicated after for each sample ID

opennotspecifiedMay 2012View details →

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships of Dysaphis pyri (Boyer de Fonscolombe) and Dysaphis reaumuri (Mordvilko) (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae): COI and EF-1α evidence

Fig. 3 BI tree showing phylogenetic relationships among D. pyri, D. reaumuri and other congeneric species with two outgroup species, A. gossypii and T. citricida, based on partial sequences of nuclear elongation factor 1 alpha (EF- 1α; 489 positions in final set). Numbers above branches indicate support of MP (left) and ML (right) bootstrap test with 1,000 replicates, and numbers below branches indicate posterior probabilities of BI analysis. Sample acronyms as in Table 1

opennotspecifiedMay 2012View details →

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships of Dysaphis pyri (Boyer de Fonscolombe) and Dysaphis reaumuri (Mordvilko) (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae): COI and EF-1α evidence

Fig. 2 Bayesian inference (BI) tree showing phylogenetic relationships among Dysaphis pyri, Dysaphis reaumuri and other congeneric species with two outgroup species, Aphis gossypii and Toxoptera citricida, based on partial sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI; 217 positions in final set). Numbers above branches indicate support of maximum parsimony (MP; left) and maximum likelihood (ML; right) bootstrap test with 1,000 replicates, and numbers below branches indicate posterior probabilities of BI analysis. Sample acronyms as in Table 1

opennotspecifiedMay 2012View details →

Fig. 1 a–c in Phylogenetic relationships of Dysaphis pyri (Boyer de Fonscolombe) and Dysaphis reaumuri (Mordvilko) (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae): COI and EF-1α evidence

Fig. 1 a–c Apterous viviparous females of Dysaphis (Pomaphis) pyri (top, specimen from sample 11–32) and Dysaphis (Pomaphis) reaumuri (bottom, specimen from sample J11–12) showing the characters used to discriminate between species: a Lateral tubercle, b cauda, c siphunculus. Sample information is given in Table 1

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of the poorly known genus Spalerosophis (Serpentes: Colubridae)

Fig. 3 Geographical distribution range of the genus Spalerosophis based on data taken from Marx (1959), Baig and Masroor (2008), www.GBIF.org website, and our study