Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,293
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,293 results for “Atlantic forests”
FIGURE 1 in Rediscovery, considerations about type locality and conservation of Rhipsalis agudoensis (Cactaceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 1. Distribution map of Rhipsalis agudoensis.
FIGURE 3 in Behuria lumiarensis (Melastomataceae), a new species on a mountaintop of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 3. Map with the collection locality of Behuria lumiarensis at central Rio de Janeiro (RJ).
FIGURE 1. Psidium grazielae Tuler & M. C in A new cauliflorous species of Psidium (Myrtaceae) from the Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 1. Psidium grazielae Tuler & M. C. Souza. Image of holotype (A.C.Tuler et al. 496, RB).
FIGURE 4 in A new species Danaea (Marattiaceae) from the Atlantic forests of Brazil
FIGURE 4. Detail of a node on the petiole of Danaea atlantica. Photograph by Maarten Christenhusz.
FIGURE 2 in A new species Danaea (Marattiaceae) from the Atlantic forests of Brazil
FIGURE 2. Habit of Danaea atlantica with fertile leaf. Photograph Maarten Christenhusz.
FIGURE 4 in Chusquea kleinii, a new bamboo from the Atlantic forests of Brazil segregated from C. capituliflora (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)
FIGURE 4. Geographic distribution of Chusquea kleinii and C. capituliflora.
FIGURE 2 in Turnera spicata: a new species of Turneraceae (Passifloraceae s.l.) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 2. Distribution map of Turnera spicata in the Espírito Santo state (ES).
FIGURE 4 in Re-establishment of Psidium macahense (Myrtaceae, Myrteae), an endemic species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 4. Tree for psbA-trnH.
FIGURE 2 in Two new Brazilian Atlantic Forest Eugenia (Myrtaceae)
FIGURE 2. Eugenia sudestis (isotype at HUFSJ; scale: 50 mm).
FIGURE 1 in A new species of Chrysophyllum (Sapotaceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic forest
FIGURE 1. Geographical distribution of Chrysophyllum pubipetalum Sossai & Alves-Araújo sp. nov.
FIGURE 3 in Begonia fimbritepala (Begoniaceae), a new species endemic to the Atlantic Coastal Forest in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
FIGURE 3. Distribution of Begonia fimbritepala (circle).
FIGURE 3 in Peperomia calcicola (Piperaceae), a new species from limestone outcrops of the southeastern Brazilian Atlantic Forest
FIGURE 3. Holotypus of Peperomia calcicola (from G.M. Marcusso et al. 1720, HRCB).
TABLE 1 S in A new endemic species of Macropsychanthus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
<p><b>TABLE 1S.</b> Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for the DNA sequences used in this study.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxon</th><th>Voucher</th><th>Locality</th><th>ITS</th><th>ETS</th><th>trnK/matK</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Dioclea sericea</i> Kunth</th><td>R. Schultze-Kraft s.n. (CIAT 9578)</td><td>Colombia, Cauca</td><td>KC779715</td><td>KC779823</td><td>KC779588</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus comosus</i> (G. Mey.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>C. van den Berg 1796 (HUEFS)</td><td>Venezuela, Bolívar</td><td>KC779706</td><td>KC779856</td><td>KC779583</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus edulis</i> (Kuhlm.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15226 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779683</td><td>KC779835</td><td>KC779573</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus glaber</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 10381 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Mato Grosso</td><td>KC779684</td><td>KC779837</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus grandiflorus</i> (Mart. ex Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Queiroz 7325 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779686</td><td>KC779839</td><td>KC779574</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus grandistipula</i> (L.P. Queiroz) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>H.C. Lima 6634 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Rio de Janeiro</td><td>KC779688</td><td>KC779840</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus latifolius</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>C. van den Berg 1163 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779696</td><td>KC779843</td><td>KC779579</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus macrocarpus</i> (Ducke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 13910 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Amazonas</td><td>KC779697</td><td>KC779844</td><td>KC779580</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus lauterbachii</i> Harms var. <i>hirsutus</i></th><td>A.N. Millar NGF13855 (L)</td><td>Papua New Guinea Morobe</td><td>MT565584</td><td>MT565564</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus lauterbachii</i> var. <i>lauterbachii</i> Verd.</th><td>M. Hopkins 1360 (K)</td><td>Papua New Guinea</td><td>KP262490</td><td></td><td>KP658375</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus malacocarpus</i> (Huber) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 13076 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Pará</td><td>KC779698</td><td>KC779845</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus marginatus</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 9136 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779700</td><td>KC779847</td><td>KC779581</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus megacarpus</i> (Rolfe) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 10135 (HUEFS)</td><td></td><td>KC779701</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus pulcher</i> (Moldenke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>M. Sousa 11095 (MEXU)</td><td>Panama, Darién</td><td>MT565575</td><td>MT565557</td><td>MT565542</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus purpureus</i> (Elmer) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Soejarto 7967 (F)</td><td>Philippines, Luzon</td><td>MT565583</td><td>MT565563</td><td>KX652152</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus violaceus</i> (Mart. ex Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Cabid s.n. (CTES)</td><td>Argentina, Corrientes</td><td>KC779702</td><td>KC779848</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus rufescens</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>J. Stehman 4721 (BHCB)</td><td>Brazil, Espírito Santo</td><td>MT565579</td><td>MT565561</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus ruschii</i> Fonseca-Cortés & Queiroz</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15254 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Espírito Santo</td><td>KC779717</td><td>KC779854</td><td>KC779590</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus schottii</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>S. Buzato 28114 (UEC)</td><td>Brazil, São Paulo</td><td>KC779710</td><td>KC779852</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus sclerocarpus</i> (Ducke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15911 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Pará</td><td>MT565577</td><td>MT565558</td><td>MT565543</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus wilsonii</i> (Standl.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 4899 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, São Paulo</td><td>KC779725</td><td>KC779857</td><td>KC779594</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1. Morphological characteristics for distinguishing M in A new endemic species of Macropsychanthus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Morphological characteristics for distinguishing <i>M. ruschii</i> of other morphological similar species of the AF, in bold the diagnostic characters of each species.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Characters</th><th><i>M. edulis</i></th><th><i>M. grandistipula</i></th><th><i>M. rufescens</i></th><th><i>M. ruschii</i></th><th><i>M. schottii</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Stipule length (mm)</th><td>10–20</td><td><b>15–30</b></td><td>10–20</td><td><b>17–20</b></td><td>10–20</td></tr><tr><th>Stipule width (mm)</th><td>3–6</td><td><b>7–15</b></td><td>3–6</td><td><b>2–3</b></td><td>3–5</td></tr><tr><th>Rachis length</th><td><b>1–2</b></td><td>2–2.5 cm long</td><td><b>To 0.5 cm</b></td><td>0.5–0.7 cm</td><td>0.2–1.5 cm</td></tr><tr><th>leaflet undersurface indumentum</th><td>Strigose to sericeous and fulvous</td><td>Glabrescent</td><td>Strigose to sericeous and fulvous</td><td>Glabrescent</td><td><b>Sericeous and argenteus</b></td></tr><tr><th>bracteoles size (mm)</th><td>3–4 × 3–4</td><td>1–3 × 1–3</td><td>3–4 × 3–4</td><td>2–3 × 1–3</td><td>2–4 × 2–3</td></tr><tr><th>flower length (mm)</th><td>13–16</td><td><b>17–20</b></td><td>13–16</td><td><b>10–12</b></td><td>13–16</td></tr><tr><th>petal color</th><td>White to bright pink</td><td>White with the center with lilac stripes</td><td>White to bright pink</td><td><b>Lilac with white stripes</b></td><td>White to bright pink</td></tr><tr><th>keel petal apex</th><td>Concave</td><td>Rounded</td><td>Concave</td><td>Rounded</td><td>Concave</td></tr><tr><th>keel petal length (mm)</th><td>8–12</td><td><b>14–17</b></td><td>8–12</td><td><b>8–12</b></td><td>9–13</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ¹: Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles, respectively. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ¹:</b> Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil.Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles,respectively.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Skulls</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.19908517</td><td>0.0004253957</td><td>468</td><td>22.36</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00366522</td><td>0.0002036232</td><td>18</td><td>10.70</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.00890443</td><td>0.0000190266</td><td>468</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.00825565</td><td>0.0000084935</td><td>972</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.37829478</td><td>0.0003965354</td><td>954</td><td>18.57</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00547536</td><td>0.0003041869</td><td>18</td><td>14.25</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.02037065</td><td>0.0000213529</td><td>954</td><td>1.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.02201359</td><td>0.0000113239</td><td>1944</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0645902300</td><td>0.0001302222</td><td>496</td><td>5.18</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0113531900</td><td>0.0007095741</td><td>16</td><td>28.23</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0124666800</td><td>0.0000251344</td><td>496</td><td>1.88</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0136608800</td><td>0.0000133407</td><td>1024</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Mandibles</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.70443879</td><td>0.0012579264</td><td>560</td><td>8.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.16</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00549957</td><td>0.0002749783</td><td>20</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0069</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.08696012</td><td>0.0001552859</td><td>560</td><td>2.46</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.75</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.07312665</td><td>0.0000387718</td><td>1160</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>1.19843989</td><td>0.0011984399</td><td>1000</td><td>8.16</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.70</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.01169771</td><td>0.0005848855</td><td>20</td><td>3.98</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.14685738</td><td>0.0001468574</td><td>1000</td><td>3.03</td><td><0.0001</td><td>11.21</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.09880745</td><td>0.0000484350</td><td>2040</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.3269927600</td><td>0.0004808717</td><td>680</td><td>4.52</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.14</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0143644400</td><td>0.0007182221</td><td>20</td><td>6.75</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0723474900</td><td>0.0001063934</td><td>680</td><td>2.39</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.41</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0622041800</td><td>0.0000444316</td><td>1400</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ²: Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ²:</b> Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Scapulae</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0941373400</td><td>0.0010459705</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0100439600</td><td>0.0010043960</td><td>2.88</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.0003</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0314069500</td><td>0.0003489662</td><td>90</td><td>5.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.91</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0118544100</td><td>0.0000592721</td><td>200</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2064168200</td><td>0.0010320841</td><td>200</td><td>4.82</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.15</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0262808000</td><td>0.0026280796</td><td>10</td><td>12.28</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0022</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0428160400</td><td>0.0002140802</td><td>200</td><td>2.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.98</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0335675700</td><td>0.0000799228</td><td>420</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2508635400</td><td>0.0009291242</td><td>270</td><td>4.07</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.11</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0256608100</td><td>0.0025660812</td><td>10</td><td>11.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.87</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0616394000</td><td>0.0002282941</td><td>270</td><td>3.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>5.72</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0412323300</td><td>0.0000736292</td><td>560</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Pelvis</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0543411200</td><td>0.0004312787</td><td>126</td><td>4.63</td><td><0.0001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043155600</td><td>0.0003082544</td><td>14</td><td>3.31</td><td>0.0002</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0117297800</td><td>0.0000930935</td><td>126</td><td>2.31</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.07</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0112943700</td><td>0.000040337</td><td>280</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1059661700</td><td>0.0003440460</td><td>308</td><td>4.42</td><td><0.0001</td><td>9.69</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0049395300</td><td>0.0003528236</td><td>14</td><td>4.53</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.0311</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0239852500</td><td>0.0000778742</td><td>308</td><td>2.00</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.64</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0251368400</td><td>0.0000390324</td><td>644</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1292837500</td><td>0.0003420205</td><td>378</td><td>5.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.51</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043550500</td><td>0.0003110747</td><td>14</td><td>5.17</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.0016</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0227608400</td><td>0.0000602139</td><td>378</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.17</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0210413800</td><td>0.0000268385</td><td>714</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
FIGURE 23 in An overview of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest species of Pachythone Bates (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae), with the description of a new species and an updated checklist of Pachythonina
FIGURE 23. Distribution map of the species of Pachythone endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
FIGURE 1 in Two new Brazilian Atlantic Forest Eugenia (Myrtaceae)
FIGURE 1. Eugenia mimetica (holotype).
FIGURE 27A–F in The spider genus Patrera Simon (Araneae: Dionycha, Anyphaeninae) in the Atlantic Forest biome, with the description of one new species from Brazil
FIGURE 27A–F. Distribution map of Patrera species.
FIGURE 1 in Octomeria lilliputana (Orchidaceae), a new species from Brazilian Atlantic Forest, State of Paraná, Brazil
FIGURE 1. Map of Paraná State, Brazil, showing the known distribution of Octomeria lilliputana.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.