Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,620 results for “Molecular Phylogeny”
Supplementary material 1 from: Wu Q, Xing BP, Lin M, Chen GC, Wang CG (2022) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Sandalia bridgesi Lorenz, 2009 with S. triticea (Lamarck, 1810) (Gastropoda, Ovulidae). ZooKeys 1096: 189-206. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1096.79402
Table S1
Supplementary material 3 from: Wu Q, Xing BP, Lin M, Chen GC, Wang CG (2022) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Sandalia bridgesi Lorenz, 2009 with S. triticea (Lamarck, 1810) (Gastropoda, Ovulidae). ZooKeys 1096: 189-206. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1096.79402
Table S3
Supplementary material 11 from: Wu Q, Xing BP, Lin M, Chen GC, Wang CG (2022) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Sandalia bridgesi Lorenz, 2009 with S. triticea (Lamarck, 1810) (Gastropoda, Ovulidae). ZooKeys 1096: 189-206. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1096.79402
Figure S5
Supplementary material 2 from: Wu Q, Xing BP, Lin M, Chen GC, Wang CG (2022) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Sandalia bridgesi Lorenz, 2009 with S. triticea (Lamarck, 1810) (Gastropoda, Ovulidae). ZooKeys 1096: 189-206. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1096.79402
Table S2
Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenies map to biogeography better than morphological ones
Fig. 3 Differences in biogeographic congruence between morphological and molecular trees. Boxplots of raw values and differences in values between morphological and molecular trees for the metrics of biogeographic congruence analysed in this study. a Consistency index (CI: W = 685, Z = 2.22, rc = 0.384, p value = 0.027). b Retention index (RI: W = 695, Z = 2.33, rc = 0.404, p value = 0.0199). c P values for the CI & RI random permutations (CI & RI p value: W = 373, Z = −1.63, rc = −0.279, p value =0.104). d Biogeographic HER (bHER: W = 888, Z = 3.08, rc = 0.51, p value = 0.002). Boxes delimit the upper and lower quartiles of the data, while central bars are median values. Whiskers delimit plus or minus 1.5 times the interquartile range, from the first and third quartiles. Coloured lines connected pairs of values from the same clade, where red dashed lines indicate the morphological tree is most biogeographically congruent and green solid lines indicate the molecular tree is most biogeographically congruent. N = 48 biologically independent pairs of morphological and molecular phylogenies.
Supplementary material 1 from: Palting JD, Moore W (2022) Molecular phylogeny of Lichen Tiger Moths (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Lithosiini): a contribution toward classifying Western Hemisphere genera. ZooKeys 1108: 119-139. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1108.80783
Figure S1
Figure 4 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 4 - Distribution of Ecuadorian snakes of the Atractus roulei species group. Dots represent known localities.
Figure 1 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 1 - Bayesian consensus phylogeny depicting relationships within colubrid snakes of the genus Atractus, summarized from 5 million post-burnin generations in MrBayes 3.2.0. The topology was derived from analysis of 2,564 bp of mitochondrial DNA (gene fragments 16S, Cytb and ND4). Numbers next to branches correspond to posterior probability values. PP values on intraspecific branches are not shown for clarity. Voucher numbers for sequences are indicated for each terminal when available.
Figure 3 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 3 - Distribution of Ecuadorian snakes of the Atractus iridescens species group. Dots represent known localities.
Figure 2 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 2 - Photographs of some Ecuadorian species of Atractus in life: Atractus carrioni MZUTI 4194 (a), MZUTI 4195 (b), Atractus duboisi MZUTI 3640 (c), Atractus dunni MZUTI 4318 (d), Atractus dunni MZUTI 2189 (e), Atractus elaps AMARU SN (f), Atractus gigas MZUTI 3286 (g), Atractus iridescens MZUTI 3680 (h), Atractus iridescens QCAZ 8072 (i), Atractus iridescens MZUTI 4697 (j), Atractus iridescens MZUTI 3548 (k), Atractus major MZUTI 4973 (l), Atractus microrhynchus MZUTI 5109 (m), Atractus modestus (n), Atractus multicinctus MZUTI 5106 (o), Atractus occidentalis MZUTI 1385 (p), Atractus occidentalis MZUTI 3323 (q), Atractus paucidens MZUTI 5102 (r), Atractus resplendens MZUTI 3996 (s), Atractus roulei MZUTI 4503 (t), Atractus savagei MZUTI 4916 (u), Atractus snethlageae (v), Atractus touzeti ANF 2390 (w), and Atractus typhon MZUTI 5110.
Figure 6 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 6 - Adult male holotype of Atractus esepe MZUTI 3758 in dorsal (a) and ventral (b) view. Scale = 1 cm.
Figure 5 from: Arteaga A, Mebert K, Valencia JH, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Peñafiel N, Reyes-Puig C, Vieira-Fernandes JL, Guayasamin JM (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Atractus (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), with emphasis on Ecuadorian species and the description of three new taxa. ZooKeys 661: 91-123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.11224
Figure 5 - Adult male holotype MZUTI 4330 (a) and adult male paratopotype (b) of Atractus cerberus MZUTI 5108.
Figure 1 from: Todisco V, Nazari V, Cesaroni D, Sbordoni V (2017) Preliminary molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the monobasic subfamily Calinaginae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 93(2): 255-264. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.93.10744
Figure 1 - (A) Approximate geographic distributions (Shirôzu 1960, Lang 2012) and sampling localities (circles) for the species of Calinaga included in this study (with the exception of the sample CBUD-INDIN for which we do not have an exact locality). Species as initially identified are highlighted and shown in different colours. Note that many of these initially attributed names subsequently proved erroneous. The map was obtained using Quantum GIS 2.8.2 based on a map from Natural Earth (www.naturalearthdata.com). (B) Median-Joining Network of mtDNA. Circle size proportional to haplotype frequency; number of nucleotide substitutions indicated along connections, except for single or double substitutions. In both figures the species are highlighted and shown in different colours as initially identified.
Figure 2 from: Todisco V, Nazari V, Cesaroni D, Sbordoni V (2017) Preliminary molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the monobasic subfamily Calinaginae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 93(2): 255-264. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.93.10744
Figure 2 - Bayesian phylogeny of Calinaga estimated in BEAST using concatenated data. Purple squares are calibration points (root: 75 ± 3; Satyrinae + Charaxinae 70 ± 3.5, Charaxes + Euxanthe 22 ± 1). Monophyly was enforced on nodes marked with orange squares. The inset map shows the biogeographic regions used in DIVA analysis: A) Southwestern China ecozone, B) Himalaya-Tibetan plateau region, C) Northern Sino-Himalaya, D) Southern Sino-Himalaya, E) Indochina. Colored dots correspond to haplogroups on the tree.
Figure 9 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 9 - Pseudocrangonyx gudariensis Tomikawa & Sato, sp. n., paratype, female (3.1 mm), NSMT-Cr 24604. A–C uropods 1–3, respectively, dorsal views.
Figure 8 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 8 - Pseudocrangonyx gudariensis Tomikawa & Sato, sp. n., paratype, female (3.1 mm), NSMT-Cr 24604. A antenna 1, medial view; B antenna 2, medial view; C gnathopod 1, lateral view; D palmar margin of propodus and dactylus of gnathopod 1, medial view; E gnathopod 2, lateral view; F palmar margin of propodus and dactylus of gnathopod 2, medial view.
Figure 7 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 7 - Pseudocrangonyx gudariensis Tomikawa & Sato, sp. n., holotype, male (3.9 mm), NSMT-Cr 24603. A pleopod 1, anterior view; B retinacula on peduncle of pleopod 1, anterior view; C pleopod 2, anterior view; D pleopod 3, anterior view; E uropod 1, dorsal view; F uropod 2, dorsal view; G distal part of inner ramus of uropod 2, dorsal view; H uropod 3, dorsal view; I–K dorsal margins of pleonites 1–3, respectively, dorsal views; L–N dorsal margins of urosomites 1–3, respectively, dorsal views; O telson, dorsal view; P–R epimeral plates 1–3, respectively, lateral views.
Figure 6 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 6 - Pseudocrangonyx gudariensis Tomikawa & Sato, sp. n., holotype, male (3.9 mm), NSMT-Cr 24603. A pereopod 6, lateral view; B dactylus of pereopod 6, lateral view; C coxa–carpus of pereopod 6, lateral view; D propodus–dactylus of pereopod 6, lateral view; E dactylus of pereopod 7, lateral view.
Figure 4 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 4 - Pseudocrangonyx gudariensis Tomikawa & Sato, sp. n., holotype, male (3.9 mm), NSMT-Cr 24603. A maxilliped, dorsal view; B inner plate of maxilliped, dorsal view; C outer plate of maxilliped, dorsal view; D gnathopod 1, lateral view; E palmar margin of propodus and dactylus of gnathopod 1, medial view; F gnathopod 2, lateral view; G palmar margin of propodus and dactylus of gnathopod 2, medial view.
Figure 1 from: Tomikawa K, Nakano T, Sato A, Onodera S, Ohtaka A (2016) A molecular phylogeny of Pseudocrangonyx from Japan, including a new subterranean species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Pseudocrangonyctidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 92(2): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.10176
Figure 1 - Map showing the collection localities of the specimens examined in this study and type localities of the known Japanese Pseudocrangonyx species. The closed circles indicate the localities of the referred materials used for the phylogenetic analyses. The star in red denotes the type locality of the new species; in purple, Pseudocrangonyx shikokunis; in blue, Pseudocrangonyx kyotonis; and in green, Pseudocrangonyx yezonis. Names of localities are shown in Table 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.