Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Fig. 1 in A photographic type catalogue of Platygastroidea (Insecta, Hymenoptera) in the Natural History Museum Vienna

Fig. 1. Leptacis foersteri Kieffer, lectotype female, NHMW-HYM#0006906. A. Anterior habitus. B. Lateral habitus. C. Dorsal habitus.

Figure 6 in An update on the phylogeny and biogeographical history of Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex

Figure 6. The biogeographic analysis of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex with S-DIVA and BBM analysis based on mt 12S rDN.

Figure 3 in An update on the phylogeny and biogeographical history of Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of sequences obtained by mt 12S rDNA from this study and sequences of GenBank. Haplotypes obtained from this study are indicated with TRY codes and highlighted in bold.

Figure 4 in An update on the phylogeny and biogeographical history of Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of sequences obtained by ITS2 from this study and sequences of GenBank. Haplotypes obtained from this study are indicated with TRY codes and highlighted in bold. Different haplotypes of the same individual are labeled as TRY-1 and TRY-2 on the phylogenetic tree.

Figure 2 in An update on the phylogeny and biogeographical history of Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of sequences obtained by mt 16S rDNA from this study and sequences of GenBank. Haplotypes obtained from this study are indicated with TRY codes and highlighted in bold.

Figure 5 in An update on the phylogeny and biogeographical history of Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex

Figure 5. The biogeographic analysis of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex with S-DIVA and BBM analysis based on mt 16S rDNA.

Fig. 3 in A new Early Triassic crinoid from Nevada questions the origin and palaeobiogeographical history of dadocrinids

Fig. 3. Advanced imaging of the holotype of the encrinid crinoid Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. (UBGD 292410), Spathian, Lower Triassic, Montello Canyon, Nevada, USA. A1, Ca map; the colour scale goes from dark to light yellow for low to higher relative concentration of calcium (Ca is abundant in the calcite crinoid pieces, but rarer in the fine clastic sediment hosting the fossil). A2, UV-excited luminescence composite image; ilumination/detection couples: red 385/732 nm; green 385/571 nm; blue 385/835 nm.

Fig. 2 in A new Early Triassic crinoid from Nevada questions the origin and palaeobiogeographical history of dadocrinids

Fig. 2. Overall view of the holotype of the encrinid crinoid Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. (UBGD 292410), Spathian, Lower Triassic, Montello Canyon, Nevada, USA. Natural light photography (A1) and camera lucida drawing (A2). The dashed line shows the outline of a shell imprint.

Fig. 4 in A new Early Triassic crinoid from Nevada questions the origin and palaeobiogeographical history of dadocrinids

Fig. 4. Close-up views of the crown of the encrinid crinoid Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. (UBGD 292410), Spathian, Lower Triassic, Montello Canyon, Nevada, USA. Natural light photography (A1), camera lucida drawing (A2), Ca map (A3), and X-ray and visible excited luminescence composite image (A4). Illumination/detection couples: red, natural light/650 nm; green, X-ray/571 nm; blue, X-ray/650 nm.

Fig. 1 in A new Early Triassic crinoid from Nevada questions the origin and palaeobiogeographical history of dadocrinids

Fig. 1. Location, geological and stratigraphic setting of the Thaynes Group where Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. was found. A. Palaeogeographic map of the late Early/early Middle Triassic showing the occurrence record of Dadocrinus species. B. Present-day map showing the location of the Western USA Basin. C. Simplified geological map of north-eastern Nevada with location of Montello Canyon. D. Stratigraphic position of Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. Maps modified after Brayard et al. (2017) and Smith et al. (2021).

Fig. 5 in A new Early Triassic crinoid from Nevada questions the origin and palaeobiogeographical history of dadocrinids

Fig. 5. Close-up view of holdfast of the encrinid crinoid Dadocrinus montellonis sp. nov. (UBGD 292410), Spathian, Lower Triassic, Montello Canyon, Nevada, USA, also showing the outline of a shell imprint (dashed line) for possible crinoid anchorage. Natural light photograph (A1) and camera lucida drawing (A2).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →

Fig. 7 in A new caenogastropod from the upper Rhaetian of Lombardy: Palaeobiogeographical history and implications for the Early Jurassic gastropod recovery

Fig. 7. Early Jurassic palaeogeographical distribution of the Zygopleuralike species listed in Table 1. Map simplified from the late Sinemurian map of Dercourt et al. (2000). Abbreviations: 1, Zygopleura vinosimonensis; 2, Melania theodori; 3, Zygopleura subnodosa; 4,Chemnitzia tatia; 5, Chemnitzia polyplecta; 6, Chemnitzia moorei; 7, Chemnitzia veturia; 8, Chemnitzia catacyclus; 9,Chemnitzia appenninica; 10, Chemnitzia paradisi.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in A new caenogastropod from the upper Rhaetian of Lombardy: Palaeobiogeographical history and implications for the Early Jurassic gastropod recovery

Fig. 3. Zygopleurid? gastropod Ederazyga fanchini gen. et sp. nov.; upper Rhaetian, Villa Edera (Lombardy, northern Italy). A. Holotype MSNVI 042/049, inner mould in apertural (A1), basal (A2), and dorsal (A3) views; external mould in general view (A4), rubber cast of the dorsal view (A5), detail of the apical spire (A6), and detail of the penultimate and last whorls (A7). B. Plaster cast replica of MSNVI 042/049a, inner mould in apertural (B1), basal (B2), and dorsal (B3) views.

Fig. 15. Age structure d in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 15. Age structure d(x) of Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki. A. Linear regression between histological age and distal femur width of D. lettowvorbecki (based on Hübner 2012) for estimating the age of the remaining specimens. B. Age distribution d(x) of D. lettowvorbecki from the Ig/WJ-locality showing the "total" (N = 138) and "average" (N = 131) method for estimating the number of deaths per age. C. Age distribution d(x) of D. lettowvorbecki of bonebed 3 (N = 45) and bonebed 4 (N = 52) on basis of the "total" method. D. Similar distribution based on the "average" method (bonebed 3: N = 41; bonebed 4: N = 48. E. Comparison of the age distributions d(x) (in percentage) of D. lettowvorbecki (yellow bars), the Late Cretaceous tyrannosaurid Albertosaurus sarcophagus (red solid line, based on Erickson et al. 2010), and the Early Cretaceous basal ceratopsid Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis (blue solid line, Erickson et al. 2009b). F. Comparison of the age distributions d(x) (in percentage) of D. lettowvorbecki (yellow bars) and large mammals: hypothetical attritional population (red solid line; modified after Klein 1982b), and the Miocene rhinocerotid Teleoceras proterum (red dashed line; based on Mihlbachler 2003); hypothetical catastrophic population (blue solid line; modified after Klein 1982b) and the Eocene hippomorph Mesatirhinus sp. (blue dashed line; based on Turnbull and Martill 1988).

Fig. 13 in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 13. Sketches by Ina or Hans Reck of articulated partial skeletons found in 1912. According to Table 2, both specimens were found in the uppermost bonebed 4. A. The German notes on the sketch tell correspondingly that this skeleton was lying with its long-axis in W-E-orientation, that it was only missing the lower part of the foot and parts of the tail, and that the skull was broken and removed separately. The skull was catalogued as WJ9000 and the postcranial skeleton as WJ5790-5820 (the latter were lost in Hamburg during WWII) which can be found in H. Reck's catalogue. The sketch was drawn on the 28th of September. B. The arrow points to a series of at least 20 articulated vertebrae. Another vertebral series, next to it on the right, is still partly covered in clay. Right next to the latter one can see the word Kicwa! (Swahili for skull). At the bottom of the image are noted teeth and a jawbone. According to the note in the lower left corner, the illustrator was unsure whether there were one small vertebral series or two. The numbers WJ9009-9023 are also present in H. Reck's catalogue. The sketch is dated 2nd of October 1912 (Pal. Mus SII, TendaguruExpedition 9.1, Archive of the Historical Division of the MfN).

Fig. 10 in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 10. Thin section of the tibia GPIT/RE/3724 of ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki Pompeckj, 1920, from Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania, cut within the lower third of the long bone shaft. Most of the marrow cavity is filled by fine, calcareous marl. Note that the top of the cavity has been filled subsequently by calcite crystals, which indicates that the bone was embedded in the substrate as oriented as in this image.

Fig. 9 in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 9. Fully prepared block MB.R.1910 (WJ5840) of ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki Pompeckj, 1920, from Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania, within the bonebeds.

Fig. 11. Associated skull SMNS 52348 in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 11. Associated skull SMNS 52348 of a juvenile individual of ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki Pompeckj, 1920, from Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania. A. The lower jaw bones at the left were detached from the specimen during preparation and are reassembled in this image. All currently identifiable elements are framed and labeled. B. Most of the unlabeled elements in the left center between the right postorbital, left exoccipital, left frontal, and left prefrontal (marked by "?") likely belong to the palate of the skull and may be identifiable after further preparation. Abbreviations: c2–c4, cervical vertebrae 2–4; l., left; r., right.

Fig. 16. A in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 16. A group of blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) crossing the Mara River, East Africa. Photo by Eric Inafuku, Wikimedia commons (https:// commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Connochaetes_taurinus_-Wildebeest_crossing_river_-East_Africa.jpg).

Fig. 7 in Research history, taphonomy, and age structure of a mass accumulation of the ornithopod dinosaur Dysalotosaurus lettowvorbecki from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania

Fig. 7. Field sketches by Hans Reck (Reck, 8th report, September 15, 1912) on the spatial relationships of the two main bonebeds. The two main bonebeds (BB-3 and BB-4) in top (A) and profile (B) views. The indicated large bones in between are labelled with "dinosaur shoulder blade and vertebra" (in German) (A) or simply "Dinos." (B) and indicate the discovery of sauropod remains in the quarry (H. Reck, 8th report, September 15, 1912; Pal. Mus SII, Tendaguru-Expedition 9.5, Archive of the Historical Division of the MfN).