Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 7. Metarhabditis amsactae (Population 2). (A–C) Anterior end; (D) pharyngeal corpus; (E) posterior region of pharynx; (F) Anterior genital branch (female); (G, I, J) vulval region; (H) uterine region with intrauterine eggs; (K) Gravid female with hatched juvenile; (L) reflexed testis; (M) female tail region; (N–Q) male tail region. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 5 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 5. Metarhabditis amsactae (Ali et al., 2011) Sudhaus, 2011. (A) Entire female; (B) entire male; (C, D) anterior region; (E) pharyngeal region; (F) female genital branch; (G–I) male tail region; (J, K) female tail region.

Figure 4 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 4. Metarhabditis andrassyana Tahseen et al., 2004. (A–C) Anterior region (C is a scanning electron micrograph); (D) pharyngeal region; (E) posterior region of pharynx; (F) vulval region; (G, H) body region showing lateral field; (I) reflexed ovary; (J) reflexed testis; (K) vulval region; (L–N) female tail region; (O–S) male tail region. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 3 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 3. Metarhabditis andrassyana Tahseen et al., 2004. (A) Entire female; (B) entire male; (C) anterior region; (D) pharyngeal region; (E) female genital branch; (F) female tail region; (G) male tail region.

Figure 2 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 2. Metarhabditis costai (Martins, 1985) Sudhaus, 2011. (A) Lip region; (B, C) anterior end; (D) corpal region; (E) pharyngeal region; (F) posterior region of pharynx; (G) intestinal region; (H, I) testis with vas deferens; (J) vulval region; (K, L) Female tail region (L is scanning electron micrograph); (M–R) male tail region (M, N are scanning electron micrographs). Scale bar = 10 µm).

Figure 1 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 1. Metarhabditis costai (Martins, 1985) Sudhaus, 2011. (A) Entire female; (B) entire male; (C) anterior region; (D) pharyngeal region; (E) female genital branch; (F) female tail region; (G) male tail region.

Figure 6 in A revision of the genus Metarhabditis (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with description of three known species, a key to the identification of congeners and discussion of their relationships

Figure 6. Metarhabditis amsactae (Population 1). (A–C) Anterior end; (D, E) pharyngeal corpus; (F) posterior region of pharynx; (G, I) uterine region (ventral); (H) posterior genital branch (female); (J) female tail region; (K–P) male tail region. Scale bar = 10 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 5. Discriminant analysis of the entire spectrum in which each species has a unique symbol. A) Note that intraspecific variation is so small that the entire set of points per individual is encompassed by the one point for the species. B) Amplification of one point (one species, N. neoaustralis) illustrates the small intraspecific variation. DF (1, 2 and 3) indicate the discriminant functions.

FIGURE 3 in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 3. NIR spectra of nine species of Neodexiopsis after pre-processing (see text) in which each line is the spectra of each of the 67 specimens. The regular divisions are the minimal intervals that have information to discriminate the nine species simultaneously in the DA.

FIGURE 2 in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 2. Illustrative diagram of the use of NIR spectroscopy with insects. A) Light source, B) Detector, C) Diffuse reflectance accessory (see text).

FIGURE 4. A in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 4. A) PCA of three species based on the spectra without transformations. Yellow triangles (N. paranensis), green circles (N. rustica) and purple circles (N. vulgaris). Explained variation: PC1=99%, PC2= 0.9%, PC3<0.01%. B) PCA of the same species as Figure 4A, based on the spectra with transformations. Explained variation: PC1=68%, PC2=10%, PC3=4%.

FIGURE 6. A in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 6. A) First interval, between 1019.56–1088.50 nm. B) Interval 15, 2052.22–2121.15 nm. DF (1, 2, 3) indicate the first three discriminant functions.

FIGURE 7 in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 7. Discriminant analysis based on 50 points between 2052.22–2086.69 nm. This region comprises the first half of the region used in Figure 4B. DF indicates discriminant functions.

FIGURE 1. A in Barcoding without DNA? Species identification using near infrared spectroscopy

FIGURE 1. A fly in the accessory for diffuse reflectance (see text). The fly is pinned on a piece of Styrofoam.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

FIGURE 3 in Molecular identification of three of the most important mealybug species (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) on ornamental plants in Guilan province, Iran

FIGURE 3. Multiplex PCR by combination of five equimolar primers for COI (PC-F, PV-F, TP-F, C1-N-2191 and TL2-N- 3014). 1: 100 bp DNA ladder; 2: Pl. citri; 3,4: P. comstocki; 5,6: P. viburni; 7: Negative control.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

FIGURE 1 in Molecular identification of three of the most important mealybug species (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) on ornamental plants in Guilan province, Iran

FIGURE 1. Schematic location of COI and primers used in this study including C1-J-1718/C1-N-2191 and C1-J-2183/TL2-N- 3014 (Simon et al. 1994).

opennotspecifiedApr 2011View details →

FIGURE 1 in The orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of a forest remnant in southern Bahia, Brazil, with new geographic records and an identification key to the known species of the area

FIGURE 1. Map showing the exact location of Parque Estadual da Serra do Conduru, state of Bahia, Brazil. Approximate location of Estação Veracel in southern Bahia is indicated by the orange square.

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →

FIGURE 9 in Mysidae (Mysida) of New Zealand; a checklist, identification key to species and an overview of material in New Zealand collections

FIGURE 9. Uropods, illustrating the relative lengths of exo- and endopods. a, Tenagomysis robusta Tattersall, 1923; b, T. similis Tattersall, 1923 (after Tattersall 1923).

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →

FIGURE 8 in Mysidae (Mysida) of New Zealand; a checklist, identification key to species and an overview of material in New Zealand collections

FIGURE 8. Antennal scales of a, Tenagomysis tenuipes Tattersall, 1918; b, Tenagomysis producta Tattersall, 1923 (a, after Bary 1956; b, after Tattersall 1923).