Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →

FIGURE 4 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach

FIGURE 4. Overview images of BSPG 1967 XX. 1-3, Colour-marked versions of Figure 3 (different individuals marked in different colours, same individuals marked in same colour in different viewing angles). 4-5, Volume renderings based on micro-CT data (Amira) (different viewing angles in 4 and 5). 6, Tomographic section from micro-CT image stack (red-coloured specimen in 1 and 2), inner structures are not preserved.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →

FIGURE 10 in What nymphal morphology can tell us about parental investment - a group of cockroach hatchlings in Baltic amber documented by a multi-method approach

FIGURE 10. Blattodean nymphs in Baltic amber. 1-4, Specimen PE 61065, dorsal view (1), distinct pigmentation of cuticula visible; ventral view (2); and stereo-images of PE 61065 (3-4). Images presented as red-cyan stereo-anaglyphs; please use red-cyan glasses to view. 5-6, Specimen ZMUC 901795, close-up image of the head (5) and closeup image of the head lateral view (6). Abbreviation: ml, femur of metathoracic leg. Other abbreviations are the same as in Figures 2 and 4.

Figure 4. Smittium aggregatum. a in A NEW ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HARPELLALES, INSECT-GUT INHABITING FUNGI, AND CHIRONOMIDAE IN JAPAN WITH AN UPDATED LIST OF HARPELLALES DOCUMENTED FROM CHIRONOMIDAE Abstract

Figure 4. Smittium aggregatum. a. Thallus in the hindgut. Arrow: Hindgut cuticle (folded when dissected). Arrowheads: spores. Hyphal aggregation at the basal area of the thallus is the feature of this species. b. Detached spore. Arrowhead: Collar. Appendage is not reported in this species. c. Spore production. Arrowhead: The youngest spore. Scales. a: 20 μm. b–c: 5μm. Specimen ID. a: TNS-F-89237. b and c: TNS-F-89234. National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo. Host: larvae of Tanytarsini collected at Enzan Takahashi, Yamanashi, 1300m above sea level. a: water-mounted. b and c: Lactophenol-mounted.

Figure 3. Stachylina pedifer. a in A NEW ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HARPELLALES, INSECT-GUT INHABITING FUNGI, AND CHIRONOMIDAE IN JAPAN WITH AN UPDATED LIST OF HARPELLALES DOCUMENTED FROM CHIRONOMIDAE Abstract

Figure 3. Stachylina pedifer. a. Mature thalli in the peritrophic membrane. Arrows: foot-like shaped basal part penetrating the peritrophic membrane. Arrowheads: folding peritrophic membrane. Also, the same symbols mean the same meaning in figs b, c, and d. b. Higher magnification of the basal part of a thallus. c. Young thallus producing spores. Double arrowheads: spore initial. d. Almost mature thallus with eight spores. *: Spores of adjacent thallus. e. Detached spore. Arrowhead: appendage. Scales. a: 20 μm. b–e: 10μm. Specimen ID. a and b: 140224-1. e: 140225-4. Photos c and d are taken from temporary slides. a, c and d: water-mounted. b and e: Lactophenol-mounted.

Figure 2 in A NEW ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HARPELLALES, INSECT-GUT INHABITING FUNGI, AND CHIRONOMIDAE IN JAPAN WITH AN UPDATED LIST OF HARPELLALES DOCUMENTED FROM CHIRONOMIDAE Abstract

Figure 2. The species number in the two major genera of Harpellales described from Chironomidae (N=139 species)

Figure 1 in A NEW ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HARPELLALES, INSECT-GUT INHABITING FUNGI, AND CHIRONOMIDAE IN JAPAN WITH AN UPDATED LIST OF HARPELLALES DOCUMENTED FROM CHIRONOMIDAE Abstract

Figure 1. Total number of species in Harpellales described from Chironomidae and other hosts (N=270 species.)

Fig. 21 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 21. Examples of common coral reef species in WA that are 'missing' in sGuianas. A. Calcinus tibicen (Herbst, 1791). B. Pachycheles riisei (Stimpson, 1859). C. Platypodiella spectabilis (Herbst, 1794). D. Justitia longimana (H. Milne Edwards, 1837). All photos from Y. Buske, Martinique Island.

Fig. 14 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 14. Comparison of the color pattern in Panulirus argus (Latreille, 1804) (left) and P. guttatus (Latreille, 1804) (right). Specimens from Martinique, photos Y. Buske.

Fig. 17 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 17. Illustration of Inachoides forceps A. Milne-Edwards, 1879 (1873–1880): 199, pl. 33 fig. 4., from French Guiana.

Fig. 13 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 13. The lobster Panulirus guttatus (Latreille, 1804) (N° 5, in red), first Decapoda Latreille, 1802 reported from French Guiana region (Suriname). Adapted from Seba (1759: pl. 21). Perhaps not P. guttatus but Panulirus argus (Latreille, 1804), instead (see checklist).

Fig. 19 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 19. Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) from Guyana, figured as Uca una (Linnaeus) in Young (1900: 252, pl. 7).

Fig. 22 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 22. Evolution of sGuianas crustacean's records (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) between 1761–2022: new records by year (n/year, right y-axis) and cumulated number over years (left y-axis). Major contributions are indicated (year; number of new records) showing two major contributions (Holthuis 1959a, 1959b; Takeda 1983).

Fig. 10 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 10. Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862), Suriname, R/V Coquette, stn 44, female (carapace length 17.5 mm). Adapted from Chace & Hobbs (1969: 55, fig. 6).

Fig. 5 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 5. Shrimp trawler Coquette (left) used for Suriname fisheries exploration, with a 65 minutes trawling catch (right) composed of shrimps and fishes. Adapted from Higman (1959: figs 1, 5).

Fig. 16 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 16. The crab Eriphia gonagra (Fabricius, 1781). A. Frontal view. B. Dorsal view. C–D. Aspect of its rocky biotope at the Islet "Petit Connétable", French Guiana. Photographs by Mathieu Foulquié (2011), determination by D. Felder.

Fig. 4 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 4. Marine aspect at the Iles du Salut at depths of 1–4 m, in the 'clearest waters', nevertheless showing an important residual turbidity. A. The lobster Panulirus argus Latreille, 1804. B. Muddyground. C. Azooxanthellate scleractinian coral. D. Octocoral. Photos Y. Buske during the MNHN 2014 Expedition (coastal module).

Fig. 3 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 3. Location of the 20 trawl stations made in 1999 onboard the R/V Antea on the French Guiana continental shelf (20–80 m) during the GREEN 0 campaign (after Le Loeuff & Cosel 2000: fig. 1).

Fig. 1 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 1. Geographic area considered for the inventory, denominated 'southern Guianas' (sGuianas). It is centered around French Guiana, extending to the north to Suriname and Guyana and, to the south, to the State of Amapá (Brazil). General direction of the marine current (adapted from satellite data in COPERNICUS 2023) and 200 miles EEZ limit are indicated.

Fig. 7 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 7. Area investigated and location of trawl stations during the Japanese R/V Nisshin-maru N° 201 campaign in 1981. Adapted from Hasegawa & Funato (1983: figs 1–2).

Fig. 12 in A documented checklist of the Crustacea (Stomatopoda, Decapoda) of the southern Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil Amapá)

Fig. 12. Example of a species probably present in Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana, although still not sampled there. Distribution map of the freshwater shrimp Euryrhynchus amazoniensis Tiefenbacher, 1978, adapted from Pachelle & Tavares (2018: fig. 63a). sGuianas is indicated by a dotted rectangle, limited on land by countries boundaries.