Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs 44–52 in Review of the genera Elaphinis and Parelaphinis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) with description of three new species from South Africa

Figs 44–52. Parelaphinis umtamvuna sp. nov. 44–51 – holotype male; 52 – female. 44, 52 – dorsal habitus; 45 – ventral habitus; 46 – lateral habitus; 47 – clypeus; 48 – pygidium; 49 – parameres, dorsal view; 50 – parameres, lateral view; 51 – parameres, frontal view. Photographs: Lynette Clennell.

Fig. 3. Copelatus species male genitalia. A – C. macellus Guignot, 1950 in A new Copelatus with small eyes from the Eastern Cape Wild Coast, South Africa (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)

Fig. 3. Copelatus species male genitalia. A – C. macellus Guignot, 1950, median lobe; B – C. basilewskyi Bilardo & Pederzani, 1979, median lobe; C – C. mkambati sp. nov., median lobe and paramere. Scale bar in C = 0.5 mm. Note that lines on the paramere represent musculature, not surface ridges. A & B after GඎංGඇඈඍ (1961) and Bංඅൺඋൽඈ & Pൾൽൾඋඓൺඇං (1979), respectively.

Fig. 43 in Review of the genera Elaphinis and Parelaphinis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) with description of three new species from South Africa

Fig. 43. Typical grassland habitat of Parelaphinis drakensbergica sp. nov. on the plateau of the Platberg above Harrismith, Free State. Photograph: ©vrystaatconfessions.com.

Figs 24–34 in Review of the genera Elaphinis and Parelaphinis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) with description of three new species from South Africa

Figs 24–34. Elaphinis (Micrelaphinis) pumila Boheman, 1857. 24–30 – paralectotype male; 31–34 – lectotype male of Heteroclita (?) scitula Janson, 1878. 24, 31 – dorsal habitus; 25, 32 – lateral habitus; 26, 33 – clypeus; 27 – pygidium; 28, 34 – specimen labels; 29 – parameres, dorsal view; 30 – parameres, lateral view. Photographs: Johannes Bergsten (24–30) (courtesy of Gerhard Beinhundner) and Oscar Vorst (31–34).

Figs 62–65. 62–63 in Review of the genera Elaphinis and Parelaphinis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) with description of three new species from South Africa

Figs 62–65. 62–63 – males of Parelaphinis umtamvuna sp. nov. (62) and of P. moesta (Gory & Percheron, 1833) (63) in their respective natural habitats on the Umtamvuna and Sneeuberge, respectively. 64–65 – typical habitat of Parelaphinis umtamvuna sp. nov. on the escarpment of the Umtamvuna River valley in southern KwaZulu-Natal (64) and of P. moesta on the escarpment of the Hantamsberg plateau above Calvinia, Northern Cape (65). Photographs: Lynette Clennell (62, 64), Petr Malec (63), David Bilton (65).

Figure 3 in Tydeid species from domatia bearing plants from South Africa with the description of two new species of the genusAfridiolorryia (Acari: Tydeidae)

Figure 3 Afridiolorryia kwelerhaensis sp. n. Female. A – Dorsal view, B – Seta c1 and detail of the prodorsal reticulation.

Figure 2 in Tydeid species from domatia bearing plants from South Africa with the description of two new species of the genusAfridiolorryia (Acari: Tydeidae)

Figure 2 Afridiolorryia psychotriae sp.n. Female. A – Palp, B – Movable digit, C – Leg I, D – Leg II.

Figure 1 in Tydeid species from domatia bearing plants from South Africa with the description of two new species of the genusAfridiolorryia (Acari: Tydeidae)

Figure 1 Afridiolorryia psychotriae sp.n. Female. A – Dorsal view, B – Seta c2 and detail of the prodorsal reticulation.

Figure 4 in Tydeid species from domatia bearing plants from South Africa with the description of two new species of the genusAfridiolorryia (Acari: Tydeidae)

Figure 4 Afridiolorryia kwelerhaensis sp. n. Female. A – Anogenital area, B – Palp, C – Movable digit.

Figure 4 Vittacus bougainvilleae collected from South Africa. A in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 4 Vittacus bougainvilleae collected from South Africa. A – Dorsal view; B – lateral view of the opisthosoma; C – female coverflap; D – coxigenital region showing male genitalia.

Figure 5 in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 5 Brevipalpus yothersi from bougainvillea in South Africa. A – ventral view; B – dorsal view of opisthosoma; C – spermatheca vesicle.

Figure 1 Vittacus bougainvilleae. A in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 1 Vittacus bougainvilleae. A – Prodorsal shield ornamentation; B – Opisthosomal dorsal pattern; C – whole mite between plant trichomes; D – Legs I and II.

Figure 6 in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 6 Brevipalpus californicus from bougainvillea in South Africa. A – ventral view; B –dorsal view; C – spermatheca vesicle.

Figure 2 in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 2 Curled up leaves (A, B) and dying flowers (B) of bougainvillea plants infested with Vittacus bougainvilleae at the nursery farm.

Figure 3 in New records of Eriophyidae and Tenuipalpidae mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on bougainvillea plants in South Africa

Figure 3 Vittacus bougainvilleae collected from South Africa. Dorsal view of prodorsal shield ornamentation and opisthosoma.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Dataset for the comparison of accelerometry-based and self-reported physical activity and their association with cardiovascular risk markers in children from South Africa

<p>Dataset used to evaluate and compare self-reported with accelerometry-based physical activity measurements as well as their associations with cardiovascular risk markers among South African school-aged children from disadvantaged communities.</p> <p>It encompasses anonymized, unique, identification numbers, demographic and body-mass-index, blood pressure, lipid panel and blood glucose measures.</p>

Fig. 1 in A revision of Grimmia (Grimmiaceae) from South Africa and Lesotho

Fig. 1. – Species richness (A) and geographic distribution (B-F) of Grimmia Hedw. species in South Africa and Lesotho. A. Distribution of species richness in the genus Grimmia Hedw. at the Quarter-Degree Square (QDS) scale; B. Grimmia consobrina Müll. Hal.; C. Grimmia donniana Sm. (stars) and G. elongata Kaulf. (circles); D. Grimmia fuscolutea Hook.; E. Grimmia kidderi James; F. Grimmia laevigata (Brid.) Brid.

Fig. 2 in A revision of Grimmia (Grimmiaceae) from South Africa and Lesotho

Fig. 2. – Geographic distribution of Grimmia Hedw. species in South Africa and Lesotho. A. Grimmia longirostris Hook.; B. Grimmia montana Bruch & Schimp.; C. Grimmia orbicularis Wilson; D. Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm.; E. Grimmia pygmaea Müll. Hal.; F. Grimmia sessitana De Not. (circles) and G. tortuosa Hook. f. & Wilson (star).

Fig. 15. – Grimmia tortuosa Hook. f in A revision of Grimmia (Grimmiaceae) from South Africa and Lesotho

Fig. 15. – Grimmia tortuosa Hook. f. & Wilson: A. Plant; B. Transverse section of stem, with central strand; C. Transverse section of stem, without central strand; D. Leaf; E. Outlines of transverse section of leaf; F. Cells in leaf base; G. Cells at leaf margin in the broadest part of leaf; H. Transverse section of leaf[A-H: Hedderson 14459, BOL]

Fig. 7. – Grimmia kidderi James. A in A revision of Grimmia (Grimmiaceae) from South Africa and Lesotho

Fig. 7. – Grimmia kidderi James. A. Plant; B. Young shoot; C. Leaflet of young shoot; D. Transverse section of stem; E. Leaves; F. Outlines of transverse section of leaf; G. Cells in leaf base; H. Cells in transitional part; I. Transverse section of leaf. [A-C: Hedderson 13724, BOL; D-G, I: Hedderson 13081, BOL; H: Hedderson 13744, BOL]