Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 11 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 11. Comparison of the ilium between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality.

FIGURE 6 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 6. Postcranial elements of Rana pyrenaica (BHC-106). A–C: Atlas in anterior, dorsal and left lateral views; D–E: Sacral vertebra in dorsal and posterior views; F–G: Urostyle in right lateral and anterior views; H–I: Scapula in dorsal and ventral views; J: Coracoid in ventral view; K–L: Humerus in ventral and medial views; M: Radioulna in medial view; N–P: Ilium in lateral, medial and distal views; Q: Ischio-pubis in lateral view; R: Femur in lateral view; S: Tibiofibula in lateral view. Scales = 1 mm.

FIGURE 5 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the pterygoid, squamosal, and parasphenoid between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, straighter ramus maxillaris on the pterygoid; 2, angulation between the transverse process and the postero-lateral process on the squamosal; 3, thinner and less leaf-shaped anterior process of the parasphenoid; 4, more concave margo posterior.

FIGURE 2 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 2. Cranial elements of Rana pyrenaica (BHC-106). A–C: Premaxilla in anterior, posterior and dorsal views; D–E: Maxilla in lateral and medial views; F: Nasal in dorsal view; G–H: Frontoparietal in dorsal and ventral views; I–K: Sphenethmoid in dorsal, ventral and anterior views; L–M: Pterygoid in ventral and dorsal views; N: Squamosal in lateral view; O: Parasphenoid in ventral view; P: Vomer in dorsal view; Q–R: Exoccipital in latero-posterior and dorsal views; S–T: Angular in lateral and dorsal views. Scales = 1 mm.

FIGURE 8 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 8. Comparison of the urostyle between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, straighter ventral margin of the urostyle; 2, shorter neural crest.

FIGURE 1 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 1. Cleared-and-stained specimens. A–C: Skulls (dorsal views), A: Rana pyrenaica (BHC-108); B: Rana iberica (BHC-104); C: Rana temporaria (BHC-114); D–E: Vertebral column (dorsal views), D: Rana pyrenaica (BHC-112); E: Rana iberica (BHC-101); F: Rana temporaria (BHC-114); G and H: Structure of the pectoral girdle (ventral views), G: Rana pyrenaica (BHC-101); H: Rana iberica (BHC-101); I–L: Structure of palmar elements, I: Rana pyrenaica (BHC-110); J: detail of the first digit of the male specimen of Rana pyrenaica (OA94072201), arrow indicates the tubercle on the third phalanx; K: Rana iberica (BHC-103); L: Rana temporaria (BHC-114); M–O: Structure of foot elements. M: Rana pyrenaica (BHC-110); N: Rana iberica (BHC-108); O: Rana temporaria (BHC-114). Scales = 5 mm.

FIGURE 3 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 3. Comparison of the maxilla between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, inclination of the anterior margin; 2, lamina horizontalis deviating dorsally at its anterior end; 3, lamina horizontalis deviating ventrally at its posterior end.

FIGURE 7 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 7. Comparison of the sacrum between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, well developed crest on the transverse processes.

FIGURE 4 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 4. Comparison of the frontoparietal and sphenethmoid between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, slight convexity of the margo orbitalis; 2, straighter margo sagittalis; 3, development of the anterior lateral processes; 4, indentation of the posterior chamber; 5, height of the anterior chambers.

FIGURE 12 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 12. Comparison of the femur between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar Lcc (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality.

FIGURE 10 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 10. Comparison of the humerus and radioulna between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality.

FIGURE 9 in A description of the skeletal morphology of Rana pyrenaica (Anura: Ranidae), with comments on functional morphology, ecological adaptation and relationships with other Iberian ranids

FIGURE 9. Comparison of the scapula and coracoid between Iberian brown frogs. All these elements correspond to frogs with a similar SVL (around 40–50 mm). For facilitating the comparison, bones have been arranged to a similar size and laterality. Arrows: 1, medial constriction of the scapula; 2, distance between the internal crest and the anterior margin of the scapula; 3, concavity of the anterior margin and slenderness of the medial part of the coracoid.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Removal of developmentally regulated microexons has a minimal impact on larval zebrafish brain morphology and function - behavior data input files

Unprocessed (tracking) larval zebrafish behavioral data from mutants with microexons removed. All genes are grouped by their beginning letter, and two runs are included for most mutants.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Removal of developmentally regulated microexons has a minimal impact on larval zebrafish brain morphology and function - imaging stacks

Results of brain activity mapping for zebrafish mutants with microexons removed. Both brain activity and structural data is included. These stacks are the significant signal that differs between the groups. They are compatable with the Z-Brain matlab viewer from Randlett, et al, 2015 Nature Methods.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Removal of developmentally regulated microexons has a minimal impact on larval zebrafish brain morphology and function - behavior data output

Graphs and quantification of larval zebrafish behavioral data from mutants with microexons removed. All genes are grouped by their beginning letter, and two runs are included for most mutants.

FIGURES 13–15 in A new genus of Pexicopiini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) for "Gelechia" acanthopis Meyrick, 1932, with review of functional morphology of male genitalia in allied genera

FIGURES 13–15. Musculoskeletal apparatus of the male genitalia. 13, Platyedra subcinerea (Haworth, 1828), lateral view; 14, ditto, basal part of tegumen and valva with attached muscles, medial view; 15, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier, 1789), lateral view. Arrows and numbers in circles indicate diagnostic characters of the tribe Pexicopiini (see the main text). Abbreviations: m3—muscles, ccl—cucullus, soc—socii; others as in Figures 10–12.

FIGURES 16–19 in A new genus of Pexicopiini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) for "Gelechia" acanthopis Meyrick, 1932, with review of functional morphology of male genitalia in allied genera

FIGURES 16–19. Musculoskeletal apparatus of the male genitalia. 16, Harpagidia magnetella (Staudinger, 1871), lateral view; 17, ditto, basal part of tegumen and valva with attached muscles, medial view; 18, Pexicopia malvella (Hübner, 1805), lateral view; 19, ditto, basal part of tegumen and valva with attached muscles, medial view. Arrows and numbers in circles indicate diagnostic characters of the tribe Pexicopiini (see the main text). Abbreviations as in Figures 10–15.

FIGURES 1–5 in A new genus of Pexicopiini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) for "Gelechia" acanthopis Meyrick, 1932, with review of functional morphology of male genitalia in allied genera

FIGURES 1–5 Sitotrogoides acanthopis (Meyrick, 1932) and Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier, 1789). 1–4, Sitotrogoides acanthopis: 1, holotype, NHMUK, inset = specimen labels; 2, male, Is. Wando, Korea, MPNU; 3, wing venation; 4, head vestiture and labial palpus. 5, wing venation of Sitotroga cerealella (modified from Zimmerman 1978). Scale bars = 5 mm.

FIGURES 6–9 in A new genus of Pexicopiini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) for "Gelechia" acanthopis Meyrick, 1932, with review of functional morphology of male genitalia in allied genera

FIGURES 6–9. Genitalia and abdominal segments of Sitotrogoides acanthopis (Meyrick, 1932). 6, male genitalia, ventral view; 7, aedeagus; 8, abdominal segment VI–VIII, terga in left, sterna in right; 9, female genitalia.

FIGURES 10–12 in A new genus of Pexicopiini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) for "Gelechia" acanthopis Meyrick, 1932, with review of functional morphology of male genitalia in allied genera

FIGURES 10–12. Musculoskeletal apparatus of male genitalia in Sitotrogoides acanthopis (Meyrick, 1932). 10, lateral view; 11, uncus, tegumen, valva, position of muscles m1, m2 and m4, medial view; 12, phallic muscles, ventral view, valvae removed partly. Arrows and numbers in circles indicate diagnostic characters of the tribe Pexicopiini (see the main text). Abbreviations: m1, m2, m4, m5a, m5b, m6, m21, m22—muscles; aed—aedeagus, b.vlv—base of valva, c—caecum, gn—gnathos, vlv—valva, vlvl —valvella, vnc—vinculum, sacc—saccus, scl—sacculus, tg—tegumen, un—uncus.