Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
794
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
794 results for “publishing”
List of multinational publishers of serial publications established by the ISSN Network
<p>The ISSN International Centre and the ISSN Network of nearly 100 national centres around the world are authorized by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to implement serial identification according to the terms of ISO3297:2022 standard.<br> The ISSN Network serves publishers who wish to uniquely identify their serial publications. These publishers contact the National Centres of the countries where they are located. When there is no national centre, they contact the ISSN International Centre.<br> The place of publication determines the ISSN Centre responsible for identification. However, when a publisher operates in several countries, an agreement may be reached between this multinational publisher and the involved ISSN Centres so that all requests for identification are handled by one centre.<br> This list identifies more than 300 multinational publishers. These publishers have been identified through the ISSN Portal (https://portal.issn.org) data. The ISSN International Centre works with the National Centres on this list of publishers to determine their responsibility for identifying the publications of these publishers.<br> The list also contains information on the names by which these publishers are known and a mapping of links between publishers. It also contains a link to the ISNI and VIAF databases in which these publishers are also recorded. This data is managed by the ISSN Network in an internal wiki that will be updated regularly.<br> The ISSN Network makes this list available to the publishing community and to librarians. They can contact the ISSN International Centre to share comments (additions, modifications, deletions) on this list which will be published quarterly.</p>
Dataset and R script used in "Local knowledge reconstructs historical resource use" published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
<p>Data and R code used in: L. Castello, E.G. Martins, M. Sorice, E. Smith, M. Almeida, G.C.C. Bastos, L.G. Cardoso, M. Clauzet, A.P. Dopona, B. Ferreira, M. Haimovici, M. Jorge, J. Mendonça, A.O. Ávila-da-Silva, A.P.O. Roman, M. Ramires, L.M. Villwock, P.F.M. Lopes. (Year) Local knowledge reconstructs historical resource use. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.</p>
Knowledge Exchange - Data from the survey on Alternative Publishing Platforms
<p>The survey data are available in two formats (.csv and .xlsx). They each contain the answers of 45 respondents to the survey conducted at the start of 2023.</p> <p>The <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXVQ_4UqZzPh6tj4lGna_SLA4iD0DF5DGjkYKu4HlVJ9AitA/viewform">survey form is still open</a>.</p>
Dataset for the paper "Exposure of medical students to sexism and sexual harassment and their association with mental health: a cross-sectional study at a Swiss medical school" published in BMJ Open (2023)
<p><strong>Full reference of the paper: </strong></p> <p>Barbier JM, Carrard V, Schwarz J, et al. Exposure of medical students to sexism and sexual harassment and their association with mental health: a cross-sectional study at a Swiss medical school. BMJ Open 2023;13:e069001. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069001</p>
Data pertaining to the published article "Quantitative T1 mapping detects blood-brain barrier breakdown in apparently non-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions" by Donatelli et al., 2023.
<p>Data pertaining to the published article "Quantitative T1 mapping detects blood-brain barrier breakdown in apparently non-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions" by Donatelli et al., NeuroImage: Clinical (2023). </p><p>PMID: <strong>37717382; </strong>PMCID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc10514220/">PMC10514220</a>; DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103509">10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103509</a></p>
Fig. 17 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 17. Open Access benefits, from Aston University Library Services (available from https://www.yearofopen.org/march-open-perspective-open-access/).
Fig. 15 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 15. Different routes for disseminating scientific publications (Cabut & Larousserie 2013, redrawn by Laurence Bénichou from Infographie du Monde).
Fig. 14 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 14. Scholar production costs. Four steps are needed to produce scholar papers, of which three are publicly-funded. In the first scenario, the library pays back the final product by subscription to the publisher while in the second, the publishing costs are supported by the publisher (commercial or institutional) and then the access is free for the reader.
Fig. 13 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 13. The authorships highlighted in yellow are cited nowhere else in the article and yet they are listed in the references section (Schott & Evans 2016).
Fig. 12 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 12. Here "Bleeker, 1857" is considered by the authors as a bibliographical reference and listed as such under the references section although it has not been cited elsewhere in the text (Tucker et al. 2016).
Fig. 6 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 6. Authorships formally presented as references, those in yellow are listed in the references section whereas those in orange are not considered as bibliographic references. A. Musavu Moussavou (2017). B. Mendoza-Garfias et al. (2017).
Fig. 2 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 2. Here, "Whalen (1989)" is cited in the taxonomic treatment but not listed in the references section (Knapp et al. 2017).
Fig. 11 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 11. Underlined in blue are the references linked to the bibliography (considered as such because they are cited in an unambiguous way elsewhere in the text) whereas those in black are not linked because they are not listed in the bibliography (Foley et al. 2017).
Fig. 1 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 1. The reference highlighted in yellow is listed under the references section, even though it has not been cited anywhere else in the article (Coritico et al. 2017).
Fig. 4 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 4. The references highlighted in orange are not listed in the References section whereas the reference in yellow, because it is recent, is listed (Ardenghi et al. 2016).
Fig. 3 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 3. Contrary to the example in Fig. 2, and despite it being published in the same journal, here "Cholnoky 1957" is cited only in the taxonomic treatment (and nowhere else in the text) and referenced under the bibliographic section (Jahn et al. 2017).
Fig. 7 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 7. In this article the reference highlighted in orange indicates a reference that is only cited under taxonomic treatment and listed under the references section; in yellow a reference that is cited elsewhere thus listed under the references section; in blue are the references that should have been listed but are not in the references section (Waite R. & Allmon W.D. 2016).
Fig. 9 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 9. In this example the references in yellow are not provided in the bibliographic section, but the the one in green is, because it has been formally mentioned elsewhere in the article as a reference (Rakotondrainibe & Jouy 2016).
Fig. 10 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 10. In this article "Utinomi 1958" is cited only in the taxonomic treatment (but nowhere else in the text) and referenced in the bibliographic section (Yu et al. 2017).
Fig. 5 in Consortium of European TaXonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taXonomy
Fig. 5. Authorship formally presented as a reference. A. Kim et al. (2017). B. Lanteri & del Rio (2017).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.