Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,620 results for “springs”
Figure 1 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 1. Map of the sampling site in the Bay of Bengal. Stations CB1 to CB5 are located along the central (88°E) and WB1 to WB4 along the western margin of the bay.
Figure 13 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 13. Multivariate cluster analysis of the data of all 129 copepod species combined from all the stations and depths in the central and western bay using the 30% cut-off level of Bray–Curtis similarity. Cluster/Group I are assemblages mostly from the mixed layer (M) and thermocline (T) from central and western transects. Group II comprises assemblages found between the thermocline and 500 m and Group III includes only a few species found exclusively from 200–300 m depth at stations CB3–CB5.
Figure 4 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 4. Vertical profiles of day (D) and night (N) zooplankton biovolume from multinet tows in the western Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon. ng: negligible biovolume; NO DATA is where the net failed to open/close. *At WB3, medusae (100 mL 100 m–3) and at WB4 salps (200 mL 100 m–3) were observed at the surface during the day.
Figure 9 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 9. Vertical distribution of abundance (log number 100 m–3) of the major copepod species in the central Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon.
Figure 3 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 3. Vertical profiles of day (D) and night (N) zooplankton biovolume from multinet tows in the central Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon. ng: Negligible biovolume; NO DATA is where the net failed to open/close. *Swarms of medusae were observed at CB3 (their biovolume 90 mL 100 m–3) and CB4 (200 mL 100 m–3) at the surface at night.
Figure 8 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 8. Vertical distribution of the various types (orders) of copepods in the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal during the spring intermonsoon. The percentages at every depth are averages from 5 stations in the central and 4 stations in the western bay. Data are unavailable at 300–500 m in the central bay due to negligible abundance.
Figure 12 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 12. Variation in multivariate dispersion (MVDISP) indices between different depth strata (9 stations data combined) and between the central and western transects in the Bay of Bengal.
Figure 11 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 11. Variation in Shannon diversity (H'), species richness (d), and evenness (J') of copepods in different depth strata in the upper 500 m of the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal.
Figure 3 in Comalcandona gibsoni sp. nov. (Ostracoda, Candonidae) from Comal Spring, Texas, USA
Figure 3. Comalcandona gibsoni sp. nov. Male: A) RV close view of posterodorsal horn-like structure. B) Pore opening with seta, external view. C) RV inside view of anterior margin. D) LV inside view of anterior margin. E) Comalcandona tressleri; male LV external view (modified from Külköylüoğlu and Gibson, 2018). Scale bar: A, B, 10 µm; C, D, 100 µm; E, 150 µm.
Figure 2 in Comalcandona gibsoni sp. nov. (Ostracoda, Candonidae) from Comal Spring, Texas, USA
Figure 2. Comalcandona gibsoni sp. nov. A) RV external view. B) LV external view. C) Dorsal view. D) Ventral view. E) Detailed view of anterodorsal margin. F) Detailed view of posterodorsal margin. G) Detailed view of horns and muscle scars on LV, external view. A, D, female; B, C, E–G, male. Scale bar: A, B, C, D, G, 100 µm. E, F, 50 µm.
Figure 6 in Comparison of microplankton heterotrophic-photoautotrophic balance based on the content of ATP and chlorophyll a in the plankton of the northern area of the Black Sea during the autumn and spring seasons
Figure 6. Distribution of microplankton HPI in the photic zone of the Crimean coastal waters and deep-water northern part of the Black Sea at April 2017.
Figure 4 in Comparison of microplankton heterotrophic-photoautotrophic balance based on the content of ATP and chlorophyll a in the plankton of the northern area of the Black Sea during the autumn and spring seasons
Figure 4. Distribution of microplankton HPI in the photic zone of the Crimean coastal waters and deep-water northern part of the Black Sea at October 2016.
Figure 3 in Comparison of microplankton heterotrophic-photoautotrophic balance based on the content of ATP and chlorophyll a in the plankton of the northern area of the Black Sea during the autumn and spring seasons
Figure 3. Distribution of microplankton HPI in the surface waters of the Crimean coastal waters and deep-water northern part of the Black Sea at October 2016.
Figure 1 in Comparison of microplankton heterotrophic-photoautotrophic balance based on the content of ATP and chlorophyll a in the plankton of the northern area of the Black Sea during the autumn and spring seasons
Figure 1. Distribution of microplankton chlorophyll a and ATP concentrations in the Crimean coastal waters and deepwaternorthern part of the Black Sea at October 2016.
Figure 5 in Dragonflies from hot springs in Russia with a country-level checklist of species known to occur in geothermal environments
Figure 5. Odonata specimens from geothermal habitats of the Kunashir Island [RMBH]. (A) Mnais costalis, male, 29.vii.2011. (B) M. costalis, male, 29.vii.2011. (C) Anotogaster sieboldii, male, 26.vii.2011. (D) A. sieboldii, female, 24.vii.2011. (E) Orthetrum melania, male, 29.vii.2011. (F) O. melania, female, 29.vii.2011. (G) Sympetrum pedemontanum elatum, male, 26.vii.2011. (H) S. pedemontanum elatum, female, 24.vii.2011. Corresponding labels are presented below each specimen. (Photos: Yu. S. Kolosova).
Figure 4 in Dragonflies from hot springs in Russia with a country-level checklist of species known to occur in geothermal environments
Figure 4. Habitats, exuvium, and larva of Odonata in geothermal areas of the Kamchatka Peninsula. (A) Warm pool near the Karymshinsky hot springs, 12 June 2013. (B) Exuvium of Libellula quadrimaculata on the shore of this pool. (C) Lakelet Medvezhie in the Valley of Geysers, 13 August 2014. (D) Larva of Aeshna juncea collected from this lakelet. Scale bar = 2 mm. (Photos: O. V. Aksenova).
Figure 2. Hot spring habitats and a in Dragonflies from hot springs in Russia with a country-level checklist of species known to occur in geothermal environments
Figure 2. Hot spring habitats and a live dragonfly on the Kunashir Island. (A) Neskuchensky hot springs, a habitat of Sympetrum pedemontanum elatum, Anotogaster sieboldii, and Orthetrum melania, 26 July 2011. (B) Stolbovsky hot springs, a habitat of Mnais costalis, Anotogaster sieboldii, and Orthetrum melania, 29 July 2011. (C) Male of Orthetrum melania near the Neskuchensky hot springs, 26 July 2011. (Photos: Yu. S. Kolosova [A, C] and O. V. Aksenova [B]).
Figure 1 in Dragonflies from hot springs in Russia with a country-level checklist of species known to occur in geothermal environments
Figure 1. Map of sampling localities of Odonata in eastern Russia: Stolbovsky hot springs (1); Neskuchensky hot springs (2); Karymshinsky hot springs (3); and the Valley of Geysers (4).
Figure 3 in Dragonflies from hot springs in Russia with a country-level checklist of species known to occur in geothermal environments
Figure 3. Microhabitats in the Neskuchensky hot springs, Kunashir Island, and Odonata larvae collected from this geothermal source. (A) Scheme of microhabitats within the geothermal system with water and ground temperature measurements during the period of 24-26 July 2011 (before heavy monsoon rainfalls). The black symbols indicate collecting sites of Anotogaster sieboldii (circles) and Sympetrum pedemontanum elatum (squares) larvae. The color arrows indicate the oviposion sites of A. sieboldii before (green) and after (red) heavy monsoon rainfalls. (B) Larvae of Anotogaster sieboldii, 26 July 2011. Scale bar = 2 mm. (C) Larvae of Sympetrum pedemontanum elatum, 26 July 2011. Scale bar = 2 mm. (Photos: O. V. Aksenova).
Figure 1 in Hot spring puddling by butterflies
Figure 1. Hot spring puddling by the Chinese peacock butterfly Papilio bianor Cramer, [1777] at the travertine field of the Neskuchensky hot springs, Kunashir Island, Russian Far East, 24 July 2011. (A) Observation site on the shore of the island. (B-C) Puddling by a male butterfly on warm mineral water. A dead larva of the carrion beetle species Silpha perforata Gebler, 1832 can be seen to the right of the butterfly (bottom photo). (Photos: Yulia Kolosova [A] and Ilya V. Vikhrev [B-C]).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.