Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,603
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,603 results for “Ecological data”
Figs. 19-20 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal
Figs. 19-20: (19) Vila Baleira, near sports field, ruderal site with Convolvulus althaeoides 25 m a.s.l. (20.03.2012), (20) Campo de Baixo, near tennis court, ruderal sites, crop fields, 20 m a.s.l. (20.03.2012); photos: A. Schwabe.
Data from: Separation of realized ecological niche axes among sympatric tilefishes provides insight into potential drivers of co‐occurrence in the NW Atlantic
<p class="Default">Golden and Blueline Tilefish (<i>Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps</i> and <i>Caulolatilus microps</i>) are keystone taxa in northwest (NW) Atlantic continental shelf‐edge environments due to their biotic (trophic‐mediated) and abiotic (ecosystem engineering) functional roles combined with high‐value fisheries. Despite this importance, the ecological niche dynamics (i.e., those relating to trophic behavior and food‐web interactions) of these sympatric species are poorly understood, knowledge of which may be consequential for maintaining both ecosystem function and fishery sustainability. We used stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) to build realized ecological niche hypervolumes to serve as proxies for diet and production use patterns of <i>L</i>. <i>chamaeleonticeps</i> and <i>C. microps</i>. We hypothesized that: (a) species exhibit ontogenetic shifts in diet and use of production sources; (b) species acquire energy from spatially distinct resource pools that reflect a sedentary life‐history and differential use of the continental shelf‐edge; and (c) species exhibit differentiation in one or more measured niche axes. We found evidence for ontogenetic shifts in diet (δ<sup>15</sup>N) but not production source (δ<sup>13</sup>C) in both species, suggesting a subtle expansion of measured ecological niche axes. Spatial interpolation of stable isotope ratios showed distinct latitudinal gradients; for example, individuals were <sup>13</sup>C enriched in northern and <sup>15</sup>N enriched in southern regions, supporting the assertion that tilefish species acquire energy from regional resource pools. High isotopic overlap was observed among species (≥82%); however, when hypervolumes included depth and region of capture, overlap among species substantially decreased to overlap estimates of 15%–77%. This suggests that spatial segregation could alleviate potential competition for resources among tilefish species inhabiting continental shelf‐edge environments. Importantly, our results question the consensus interpretation of isotopic overlap estimates as representative of direct competition among species for shared resources or habitats, instead of identifying habitat segregation as a possible mechanism for the coexistence of tilefish species in the NW Atlantic.</p>
Data from: Post-fledging behavioral ecology of migratory songbirds: How do fledgling activity rates vary across species?
<p>This datsaset contains data for a comparison of fledgling activity rates from 9 songbird species in east-central Illinois, USA, described in the paper: "Jones, TM, and MP Ward. 2021. Post-fledging behavioral ecology of migratory songbirds: how do fledgling activity rates vary across species?"; published in <em>Behavioral Ecology</em>. The dataset contains estimates of fledgling activity rates during the daytime, nighttime, and across the post-fledging period, which were compared to estimates of fledgling morphologies (e.g. mass, tarsus, wing development) and post-fledging survival. Analyses, which can be reproduced with this data, showed that overall rates of post-fledging activity differed by species, but species showed similarities in the development of activity rates across the period. All species exhibited a stead increase in activity rates with age and general patterns mirrored rates of post-fledging mortality, including the presence and absence of post-fledging bottlenecks within each species. Additionally, our findings suggest that fledgling wing development and brood size at fledging contribute to variatio in activity rates within and across species.</p>
Figure 2 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 2 - IndVals at different levels in the UPGMA tree. Result for a single species, Dicheirotrichus gustavii, calculated by the original IndVal program. Eight values of the nine levels are significant. Data: abundance/frequency data. 7/4: a total of seven specimens were found in four of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 1 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 1 - Result of a cluster analysis using Relative Euclidean distances and Ward's method. Most traps of the site at the lowest elevation (-20 cm below MHW) cluster with those of 100 cm above MHW. Arrow: One trap of -20 behaves differently.
Figure 3 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 3 - Results of the IndVal procedure depend on the tree used. Data: abundance/frequency of Cillenus lateralis along the elevation gradient. 3/3: a total of three specimens was found in three of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 8 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 8 - Several longhorn beetles specimens from the collection of the first author: A Agapanthia detrita B label of Agapanthia detrita C Oberea ruficeps muchei D label of Oberea ruficeps muchei E Phytoecia eylandti F label of Phytoecia eylandti G Phytoecia ochraceipennis H label of Phytoecia ochraceipennis.
Figure 7 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 7 - Several longhorn beetles specimens from the collection of the first author: A Aromia moschata cruenta B label of Aromia moschata cruenta C Aromia moschata cruenta D label of Aromia moschata cruenta E Xylotrechus namanganensis F label of Xylotrechus namanganensis G Mallosiola regina H label of Mallosiola regina.
Figure 6 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 6 - Several longhorn beetles specimens from the collection of the first author: A Xenoleptura hecate B label of Xenoleptura hecate C Apatophysis pavlovskii D label of Apatophysis pavlovskii E Semanotus semenovi F label of Semanotus semenovi G Anaglyptus bicallosus H label of Anaglyptus bicallosus.
Figure 5 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 5 - Several longhorn beetles specimens from the collection of the first author: A Arhopalus rusticus rusticus B label of Arhopalus rusticus rusticus – first record from Tajikistan C Mesoprionus zarudnii D label of Mesoprionus zarudnii E Pogonarthron bedeli F label of Pogonarthron bedeli G Stictoleptura cardinalis H label of Stictoleptura cardinalis.
Figure 4 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 4 - Field photos of imagines in nature, their habitats and larval feeding grounds of several Tajik cerambycid species: A birch and willow bushes near a river valley, the habitat of Turkaromia gromenkoi B sawdust-like waste on the outside of the trunk of a middle-aged willow, the probable result of the larval feeding of Turkaromia gromenkoi C female of Ropalopus nadari on the bark of Malus sieversii D walnut and apple trees in a mountain valley, the habitat of Turanium pilosum and Ropalopus nadari E larval feeding grounds of Turanium pilosum F tugay in the Vakhsh River valley, the habitat of Chlorophorus elaeagni and Chlorophorus faldermanni G tugay with blossoming Tamarix in the Vakhsh River valley H male and female of Agapanthia soror in copula on Prangos.
Figure 3 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 3 - Field photos of imagines in nature, their habitats and larval feeding grounds of several Tajik cerambycid species: A female of Psilotarsus turkestanicus before laying of eggs B general view of the location of Psilotarsus turkestanicus C detailed view of a semi-ruderal plant community, the habitat of Psilotarsus turkestanicus D larval feeding grounds of Aeolesthes sarta E one of the last larval instars of Aeolesthes sarta F riverside woodlands with dying trees, the habitat of Aeolesthes sarta G mountain meadow overgrown by Prangos and Ferula, the habitat of Agapanthia soror and Neoplocaederus scapularis H Neoplocaederus scapularis on an overblown inflorescence of Ferula.
Figure 2 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 2 - Photos of longhorn beetles specimens collected during the expedition to Tajikistan in 2014: A Agapanthia soror (male) B Agapanthia soror (female) C Cleroclytus banghaasi D Chlorophorus faldermanni (male) E Chlorophorus faldermanni (female) F Xylotrechus stebbingi, G Chlorophorus elaeagni (male) H Chlorophorus elaeagni (female).
Map 1 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Map 1 - Research plots in the western part of Tajikistan: 1 Iskanderkul 2 Tojikobod 3 Takob 4 Garm 5 Karatag 6 Romit 7 Shahrinav 8 Dushanbe 9 Arykboshi 10 Kangurt 11 Sarichashma 12 Garavuti (OpenStreetMap contributors).
Figure 1 from: Kadyrov AKh, Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Taszakowski A, Walczak M (2016) New data on distribution, biology, and ecology of longhorn beetles from the area of west Tajikistan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 606: 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.606.9190
Figure 1 - Photos of longhorn beetles specimens collected during the expedition to Tajikistan in 2014: A Psilotarsus turkestanicus (male) B Psilotarsus turkestanicus (female) C Trichoferus campestris D Aeolesthes sarta E Neoplocaederus scapularis (male) F Neoplocaederus scapularis (female) G Turkaromia gromenkoi H Ropalopus nadari I Turanium pilosum.
Data and R Code from "PAT-GEOM: A Software Package for the Analysis of Animal Patterns" (published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
<p>Datasets for Figures 2 and 4 in the article "PAT-GEOM: A Software Package for the Analysis of Animal Patterns" (published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution) and the R code used to perform the analysis described in the article.</p>
Figure 9 from: Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Plewa R, Walczak M, Hilszczański J, Kruszelnicki L, Łoś K, Jaworski T, Bidas M, Tarwacki G (2018) New data on the distribution, biology and ecology of the longhorn beetles from the area of South and East Kazakhstan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 805: 59-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660
Figure 9 Field photos of imagines in nature and habitats of typical Kazakh cerambycid species: A male of PsilotarsusbrachypterusbrachypterusB female of P.brachypterusbrachypterusC female of P.brachypterusbrachypterus while spraying pheromones with raised ovipositor D massive occurrence of the males of P.brachypterusbrachypterus attracted to an artificial light source E male of P.brachypterusbrachypterus hunted by LatrodectustredecimguttatusFArtemisia-desert in Kurshim environs, the habitat of P.brachypterusbrachypterusG male of PsilotarsusbrachypteruspubiventrisH female of P.brachypteruspubiventris.
Map 1 from: Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Plewa R, Walczak M, Hilszczański J, Kruszelnicki L, Łoś K, Jaworski T, Bidas M, Tarwacki G (2018) New data on the distribution, biology and ecology of the longhorn beetles from the area of South and East Kazakhstan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 805: 59-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660
Map 1 Research plots in Kazakhstan: 1 Tartogay env. (44°25'N, 66°13'E) 2 10 km NW of Akkol (43°27'N, 70°35'E) 3 5 km W of Kenen (43°25'N, 74°58'E) 4 10 km S of Kaskeleng (43°05'N, 76°35'E) 5 Kaskeleng (43°12'N, 76°38'E) 6 two neighbouring localities: Kapchagay (43°52'N, 77°03'E), 8 km N of Kapchagay (43°56'N, 77°02'E) 7 two neighbouring localities: 22 km N of Kapchagay (44°05'N, 77°02'E), 26 km N of Kapchagay (44°06'N, 77°03'E) 8 50 km N of Kapchagay (44°18'N, 76°56'E) 9 2 km E of Arkhaly (44°10'N, 77°56'E) 10 2 km E of Saryozek (44°22'N, 78°01'E) 11 5 km N of Karashota (43°41'N, 78°09'E) 12 25 km SW of Kalinino 13 Karlygash env. (44°16'N, 78°28'E) 14 38 km SW of Szonży (43°21'N, 79°03'E) 15 four neighbouring localities: 2 km N of Kegen (43°02'N, 79°13'E), 10 km N of Kegen (43°09'N, 79°12'E and 43°07'N, 79°11'E), 15 km N of Kegen (43°09'N, 79°12'E) 16 13 km W of Szonży (43°32'N, 79°17'E) 17 17 km SE of Kegen (42°55'N, 79°25'E) 18 5 km E of Saryzhaz (42°55'N, 79°40'E) 19 7 km N of Sarymbel (44°29'N, 80°04'E) 20 two neighbouring localities: 1 km E of Tambala (45°14'N, 78°38'E), 34 km W of Kapal (45°14'N, 78°39'E) 21 three neighbouring localities: 15 km E of Kapal (45°11'N, 79°12'E), 16 km NE of Kapal (45°12'N, 79°14'E), 22 km E of Kapal (45°13'N, 79°16'E) 22 10 km SW of Sarkan (45°21'N, 79°48'E) 23 6 km E of Koylik (45°38'N, 80°19'E) 24 two neighbouring localities: Kabanbay (45°50'N, 80°37'E), 7 km W of Kabanbay (45°48'N, 80°31'E) 25 10 km E of Gerasimovka (45°48'N, 80°59'E) 26 3 km N of Taskesken (47°14'N, 80°47'E) 27 15 km NW of Taskesken (47°18'N, 80°36'E) 28 50 km S of Ajagöz (47°37'N, 80°38'E) 29 48 km N of Ajagöz (48°22'N, 80°29'E) 30 two neighbouring localities: 120 km NE of Ajagöz (48°57'N, 80°55'E), 125 km NE of Ajagöz (48°57'N 80°54'E) 31 Tarbagatay env. (47°47'N, 81°17'E) 32 five neighbouring localities: 25 km E of Tarbagatay (47°46'N, 81°36'E), 27 km E of Tarbabatay (47°46'N, 81°36'E), 15 km W of Tarbagatay (47°46'N, 81°37'E), 20 km W of Tarbagatay (47°47'N, 81°42'E), 25 km W of Tarbagatay (47°50'N, 81°49'E) 33 10 km E of Kyzyl Kesik (47°53'N, 82°06'E) 34 Zhantikei env. (48°04'N, 82°42'E) 35 20 km NW of Tauke (47°57'N, 83°16'E) 36 5 km SE of Kabanbay (47°49'N, 83°37'E) 37 20 km NW of Zaysan (47°34'N, 84°39'E) 38 12 km S of Zaysan (47°21'N, 84°51'E) 39 two neighbouring localities: 5 km NE of Zaysan (47°30'N, 84°57'E), Aynabulak (47°33'N, 85°03'E) 40 three neighbouring localities: 5 km SE of Kuygan (48°38'N 83°32'E), 8 km NW of Kurshim (48°34'N, 83°36'E), Kurshim env. (48°34'N, 83°36'E) 41 7 km N of Samarskoje (49°05'N, 83°20'E) 42 Verkhnie Tainty env. (49°24'N, 83°03'E) 43 10 km S of Bayash Utepov (49°35'N, 82°28'E) 44 Ust-Kamienogorsk (50°00'N, 82°33'E) 45 Putintsevo env. (49°52'N, 84°21'E) 46 Bykovo env. (49°42'N, 84°34'E and 49°39'N, 84°33'E) (OpenStreetMap contributors).
Figure 6 from: Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Plewa R, Walczak M, Hilszczański J, Kruszelnicki L, Łoś K, Jaworski T, Bidas M, Tarwacki G (2018) New data on the distribution, biology and ecology of the longhorn beetles from the area of South and East Kazakhstan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 805: 59-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660
Figure 6 Photos of longhorn beetles specimens collected during the expedition to Kazakhstan in 2017: ADorcadionabakumovisarkandicum (male) BD.abakumovisarkandicum (female) CDorcadiontenuelineatum (male) DD.tenuelineatum (female) EDorcadioncrassipescrassipes (male) FD.crassipescrassipes (female) GDorcadionacutispinum (male) HD.acutispinum (female) IDorcadiongeblerigebleri (male, Zaysan environs) JD.geblerigebleri (male, Kabanbay environs) KD.geblerigebleri (female) LDorcadionarietinumarietinum (male).
Figure 7 from: Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Plewa R, Walczak M, Hilszczański J, Kruszelnicki L, Łoś K, Jaworski T, Bidas M, Tarwacki G (2018) New data on the distribution, biology and ecology of the longhorn beetles from the area of South and East Kazakhstan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys 805: 59-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660
Figure 7 Photos of longhorn beetles specimens collected during the expedition to Kazakhstan in 2017: ADorcadionabsinthiumishkovi (male) BD.absinthiumishkovi (female) CDorcadionkapchagaicum (male) DD.kapchagaicum (female) EDorcadionnikolaevi (male) FD.nikolaevi (female) GDorcadionsuvorovikonyrolenum (male) HD.suvorovikonyrolenum (female) IDorcadiontianshanskiiradkevitshi (male) JD.tianshanskiiradkevitshi (female) KDorcadionunidiscale (male) LD.unidiscale (female).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.