Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,761
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,761 results for “phylogenetic relationship”
FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic relationships between T. cinnabarinus and T. urticae inferred from ITS2 in Genetic Relationship between the Carmine Spider Mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) and the Two-spotted Mite T. urticae Koch in China Based on the mtDNA COI and rDNA ITS2 Sequences
FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic relationships between T. cinnabarinus and T. urticae inferred from ITS2 data of Neighbor- Joining methods. Phylogenetic tree was established by MEGA based on Kimura-2-parameter distance. Numbers on branches indicate the percentage of 100 bootstraps supporting the branching pattern shown. Two sequences of T. evansi and T. pacificus were used as outgroups.
FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of the Penaeidae (Crustacea: Decapoda) revealed by mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences
FIGURE 1. Morphological phylogeny of the penaeid genera proposed by (a) Kubo 1949, reconstructed from text (genera in brackets were not fully analyzed and '?' refers to uncertain relationship) and (b) Burkenroad 1983, reconstructed from key (mentioned by the author as "...a natural key down to the level of genus"), with Penaeini as Peneini, Parapenaeini as Parapeneini, Trachypenaeini as Trachypeneini, and Metapenaeus as Mangalura. *Considered to be the most primitive genus in the family.
FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of the Penaeidae (Crustacea: Decapoda) revealed by mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences
FIGURE 2. BIO-neighbor-joining (BIO-NJ) tree of Penaeidae based on partial mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap values from BIO-NJ (normal text), maximum parsimony (in italics), maximum likelihood (in bold) analyses and posterior probability values from Bayesian (in italics bold) analyses. Bootstrap values below 50% are not shown. A, B, C refer to the three main clades in the tree. Parapenaeini, Trachypenaeini and Penaeini are the three groups as defined by Burkenroad (1983).
FIGURE 2 in Plaubelia burmensis, a new name for P. perinvoluta (Pottiaceae), with special reference to the phylogenetic relationship between Plaubelia and Hyophila
FIGURE 2. The consensus tree from maximum parsimony analysis of a combined molecular dataset. Values above the branches indicate Bayesian posterior probability (≥0.95) and the maximum parsimony bootstrap support (≥70) (from left to right). Values below the branches show maximum likelihood bootstrap support (≥70).
FIGURE 1. Plaubelia burmensis. A. Plants. B in Plaubelia burmensis, a new name for P. perinvoluta (Pottiaceae), with special reference to the phylogenetic relationship between Plaubelia and Hyophila
FIGURE 1. Plaubelia burmensis. A. Plants. B. Transverse section of a young stem. C. Leaves of young shoot (upper part) of a plant. D. Leaves of the rosulate part of a plant. E. Transverse sections of leaves. F. Leaf apex. G. Basal part of leaf (A−F from Mao 101, SZG, drawn by P. Ma).
FIGURE 3 in A phylogenetic analysis of the Cryptocarya group (Lauraceae), and relationships of Dahlgrenodendron, Sinopora, Triadodaphne, and Yasunia
FIGURE 3. Result of the ITS Bayesian analysis. Numbers above the clades are posterior probabilities, numbers below the clades are bootstrap percentages from the MP analysis based on the same matrix. Clades with <50% bootstrap support are marked with "--". An "x" indicates that there is a different clade with ≥50% support in the bootstrap consensus of the maximum parsimony analysis. Clade numbers used in the text are indicated near the base of each clade. Black circles mark clades that are present in all analyses, black squares indicate clades that are compatible with all Bayesian and maximum parsimony analyses, black diamonds indicate clades conflicting with the result from the trnK intron data set.
FIGURE 2 in A phylogenetic analysis of the Cryptocarya group (Lauraceae), and relationships of Dahlgrenodendron, Sinopora, Triadodaphne, and Yasunia
FIGURE 2. Result of the trnK Bayesian analysis. Numbers above the clades are posterior probabilities, numbers below clades are bootstrap percentages from the MP analysis. Clades with <50% bootstrap support are marked with "--". Clade numbers used in the text are indicated near the base of each clade. Black circles mark clades that are present in all analyses, black squares indicate clades that are compatible with all Bayesian and Maximum Parsimony analyses, black diamonds indicate clades conflicting with the result from the ITS data set.
FIGURE 1 in A phylogenetic analysis of the Cryptocarya group (Lauraceae), and relationships of Dahlgrenodendron, Sinopora, Triadodaphne, and Yasunia
FIGURE 1. Results of the combined Bayesian trnK and ITS analysis. Numbers above the clades are posterior probabilities, numbers below clades are bootstrap percentages from the MP analysis based on the same matrix. Clades with <50% bootstrap support are marked with "--". An "x" indicates that there is a different clade with ≥50% support in the bootstrap consensus of the maximum parsimony analysis. Clade numbers used in the text are indicated near the base of each clade. Black circles mark clades that are present in all analyses, black squares indicate clades that are compatible with all Bayesian and maximum parsimony analyses. Diamonds mark conflicting clades; white diamonds indicate clades from the ITS data set that conflict with the result from the trnK intron data set, black diamonds indicate clades from the trnK intron data set that conflict with the result from the ITS data set.
FIGURE 4 in A phylogenetic analysis of the Cryptocarya group (Lauraceae), and relationships of Dahlgrenodendron, Sinopora, Triadodaphne, and Yasunia
FIGURE 4. Bootstrap consensus of the maximum likelihood combined analysis. Numbers next to the nodes are likelihood bootstrap percentages, the black diamond indicating clade 65 that was retrieved in the ML analysis only.
FIGURE. 50 in The phylogenetic relationships of Torrendiella and Hymenotorrendiella gen. nov. within the Leotiomycetes
FIGURE. 50% majority-rule consensus tree based on a Bayesian analysis of SSU, 5.8S rRNA, and LSU gene sequences. Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 90% are shown above the edges. Sequences for taxa marked # from Wang et al. (2006), the Chaetomella and Pilidium sequences are from Rossman et al. (2004), the remaining taxa sequenced as part of this study are listed in Table 1.
FIGURE 4 in Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae
FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic relationships in Spiranthinae inferred from nuclear (ITS) and plastid (rbcL, matK-trnK, trnL-trnF) DNA sequences by maximum likelihood (ML). The main tree is the ML tree; numbers under branches are bootstrap proportions from the ML bootstrap analysis. The inset on the upper left hand is the ML tree with branches drawn proportional to branch lengths. The major clades referred to in the text are marked as follows: a, Stenoptera clade; b, Prescottia clade; c, "core" Cranichidinae; d, Spiranthinae (excluding Discyphus). The position of Discyphus is indicated by an asterisk (*).
FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic relationships in Spiranthinae inferred from nuclear (ITS) and plastid (rbcL, matK-trnK, trnL-trnF) DNA sequences by maximum parsimony (MP). The main tree is the strict consensus of 24 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) recovered by the analysis; numbers under branches are bootstrap proportions (from the MP bootstrap analysis). The inset on the upper left hand is one of the 24 MPTs with branches drawn proportional to branch length. The major clades referred to in the text are marked as follows: a, Stenoptera clade; b, Prescottia clade; c, "core" Cranichidinae; d, Spiranthinae (excluding Discyphus). The position of Discyphus is indicated by an asterisk (*).
FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae
FIGURE 2. Discyphus scopulariae (from Coelho de Moraes 2171). A. Habit. B. Flower. C. Flower opened out between dorsal sepal and one lateral sepal. D. Dorsal sepal. E. Lateral sepal. F. Petal. G. Labellum. H. Column, ventral view. I. Column apex, side view. Single bar = 1 mm, double bar = 1 cm. Drawn by Judi Stone and originally published in Pridgeon et al. 2003: Fig. 181.1 (reproduced with permission).
FIGURE 1. Discyphus scopulariae. A in Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae
FIGURE 1. Discyphus scopulariae. A. Flowering plant in situ (Bahia, Brazil, Popovkin 338A). B−E. Another flowering plant removed from soil (Bahia, Brazil, Popovkin 900). C. Inflorescence. D. Roots and leaf from below. E. Close-up of the column apex from below with the pollinarium removed, showing the bifid rostellum remnant and the two stigmatic areas with pollinium fragments presumably deposited by an unrecorded pollinator. Photographers: Alex Popovkin (A−D), Isys Souza (E).
Figure 1 in Phylogenetic relationships of millipedes in the subclass Penicillata (Diplopoda) with a key to the genera
Figure 1. Habitus drawings of species from the three families of Polyxenida (not to scale). (a) Family Synxenidae, Phryssonotus novaehollandiae (Silvestri, 1923); (b) family Polyxenidae, subfamily Polyxeninae, Propolyxenus australis Short and Huynh, 2009; (c) family Polyxenidae, subfamily Monographinae, Unixenus mjoebergi (Verhoeff, 1924); (d) family Polyxenidae, subfamily Macroxeninae, Chilexenus rosendinus Silvestri, 1948; (e) family Lophoproctidae, Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic relationships of millipedes in the subclass Penicillata (Diplopoda) with a key to the genera
Figure 2. Optimal maximum likelihood tree (lnL = −10,376.678214) based on molecular data (COI, 16S, 18S). Bootstrap support values (> 50%) shown on the nodes. Thelytokous populations of P. novaehollandiae (Silvestri, 1923) and the one confirmed thelytokous population of Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) are marked with an asterisk.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetic relationships of millipedes in the subclass Penicillata (Diplopoda) with a key to the genera
Figure 3. Strict consensus of 626 MP trees based on combined morphological and molecular data. Jackknife (JF) support values (> 50%) shown above the nodes (in parentheses, JF values based on molecular data only). Thelytokous populations of Phryssonotus novaehollandiae (Silvestri, 1923) and the one confirmed thelytokous population of Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) are marked with an asterisk.
Figure 13 in Phylogenetic relationships among genera of the tribe Cnephasiini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) based on morphological characters of adults
Figure 13. Posterior part of the female genitalia in the examined specimens. (A) Acleris forsskaleana; (B) Tortrix viridana; (C) Oxypteron wertheimstenin. The numbers indicate the character and its state (character: character state) and arrows show the location of characters.
Figure 11 in Phylogenetic relationships among genera of the tribe Cnephasiini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) based on morphological characters of adults
Figure 11. Drawings of selected characters of the male genitalia (I, uncus. II, juxta. III, gnathos. IV, vinculum and tegument. V, transtilla) in the examined material. (A) Doloploca punctulana; (B) Neosphaleroptera nubilana; (C) Exapate duratella; (D) Tortrix viridana; (F) Kawabeia razowskii; (F) Cnephasia heinemanni; (G) Oxypteron wertheimsteini; (H) Decodes
Figure 10 in Phylogenetic relationships among genera of the tribe Cnephasiini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) based on morphological characters of adults
Figure 10. Genitalia in Cnephasia heinemanni. (A) Male genitalia (aedeagus separately in ventral view); (B) female genitalia. The numbers indicate the character and its state (character: character state) and arrows show the location of characters.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.