Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4 in Review of amphipods of the family Pleustidae Buchholz, 1874 (Amphipoda) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia). II. Subfamily Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994

FIGURE 4. Eosymtes magnumoculis sp. nov., holotype, female, 8.9 mm (the shelf of eastern Sakhalin): a—lateral view, b—cephalon, c—upper lip, d—left mandible, e—incisor and molar of left mandible, f—incisor and molar of right mandible; paratype, female, 6.5 mm (the shelf of eastern Sakhalin): g—antenna 1, h—additional flagellum of antenna 1, i—antenna 2, j—incisor and molar of right mandible, k—lacinia mobilis of right mandible; paratype, female, 5.3 mm (the shelf of eastern Sakhalin): l—lacinia mobilis of right mandible; paratype, female, 6.3 mm (the shelf of western Kamchatka): m—lacinia mobilis of right mandible: scales: a, g, i—1 mm; b—0.5 mm; c, d—0.2 mm, e, f, h, j, k, l, m—0.1 mm

FIGURE 2 in Review of amphipods of the family Pleustidae Buchholz, 1874 (Amphipoda) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia). II. Subfamily Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994

FIGURE 2. Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994: a–c—peduncle of antenna 1; d–f—maxilla 2; g–i—palp of maxilliped; j–l—coxal plates 1–3 posteroventrally; m, n, o—propodus and dactylus of pereopods 3–7; a, d, g, j, m—Eosymtes minutus Bousfield and Hendrycks, 1994 (from Bousfield and Hendrycks 1994), b, e, h, k, n—Eosymtes magnumoculis sp. nov., c, f, i, l, o—Cognateosymtes serraticoxae Labay, 2018 (from Labay 2018)

FIGURE 3 in Review of amphipods of the family Pleustidae Buchholz, 1874 (Amphipoda) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia). II. Subfamily Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994

FIGURE 3. Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994: a—urosome segments 1–3; c, f—uropod 1; d, g—uropod 2; b, e, h—uropod 3; a, b—Eosymtes minutus Bousfield and Hendrycks, 1994 (modified from Bousfield and Hendrycks 1994), c, d, e—Eosymtes magnumoculis sp. nov., f, g, h—Cognateosymtes serraticoxae Labay, 2018 (from Labay 2018)

FIGURE 1 in Review of amphipods of the family Pleustidae Buchholz, 1874 (Amphipoda) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia). II. Subfamily Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994

FIGURE 1. Eosymtinae Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1994, lateral view: a—Eosymtes minutus Bousfield and Hendrycks, 1994 (from Bousfield and Hendrycks 1994: fig. 7), b—Eosymtes magnumoculis sp. nov., c—Cognateosymtes serraticoxae Labay, 2018 (from Labay 2018: fig. 2a)

Distribution. Arctic areas of Alaska, Canada, and NE & N Greenland. Successfully introduced into W & SW Greenland, Norway, Russia, and several areas of Alaska outside their natural range. in Bovidae

Distribution. Arctic areas of Alaska, Canada, and NE & N Greenland. Successfully introduced into W & SW Greenland, Norway, Russia, and several areas of Alaska outside their natural range.

Subspecies and Distribution. R.a.asiaticaLydekker,1908—NE&ETurkey. R. a. caucasica Lydekker, 1910 — Caucasus in S Russia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. in Bovidae

Subspecies and Distribution. R.a.asiaticaLydekker,1908—NE&ETurkey. R. a. caucasica Lydekker, 1910 — Caucasus in S Russia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan.

Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.sibiricaPallas,1776—Russia(Siberia),NWChina,WMongolia,NEKazakhstan. C.s.alaianaNoack,1902—Kyrgyzstan,SEKazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Tajikistan,NAfghanistan,WChina. C.s.hagenbeckiNoack,1903—C&SMongolia,NChina. C. s. sakeen Blyth, 1842 — N Pakistan, N India. in Bovidae

Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.sibiricaPallas,1776—Russia(Siberia),NWChina,WMongolia,NEKazakhstan. C.s.alaianaNoack,1902—Kyrgyzstan,SEKazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Tajikistan,NAfghanistan,WChina. C.s.hagenbeckiNoack,1903—C&SMongolia,NChina. C. s. sakeen Blyth, 1842 — N Pakistan, N India.

Distribution. Turkey, S Russia (Daghestan and Chechnya), NE Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, N Iraq, Iran, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and SW Pakistan. A free-roaming population introduced in 1970 in SC New Mexico, USA, increased to 2000 animals, but the population is actually maintained at 500-1000 by legalized sport hunting. in Bovidae

Distribution. Turkey, S Russia (Daghestan and Chechnya), NE Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, N Iraq, Iran, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and SW Pakistan. A free-roaming population introduced in 1970 in SC New Mexico, USA, increased to 2000 animals, but the population is actually maintained at 500-1000 by legalized sport hunting.

Subspecies and Distribution. R.t.tarandusLinnaeus,1758—Norway. R.t.caribouGmelin,1788—SCanada(fromSYukontoLabradorandNewfoundland)andNWUSA(NEWashington,NIdaho&WMontana). R.t.fennicusLonnberg,1909—FinlandandNWRussia(Karelia). R.t.groenlandicusLinnaeus,1767—Alaska,NCanada,WGreenland. R.t.pearsoniLydekker,1903—NovayaZemlya(Russia). R.t.pearyiJ.A.Allen,1902—CanadianArcticIs. R. t. phylarchus Hollister, 1912 — Russian Far East (Amur region, Okhotsk area, Sakhalin, Kamchatka). R.t.platyrhynchusVrolik,1829—Svalbard(Norway). R.t.sibiricusMurray,1866—NSiberiantundra,RussianArcticIs. R. t. valentinae Flerov, 1933 — Ural Mts (Russia), Altai Mts, Mongolia. Feral Icelandic population originated from animals introduced from Norway in 1771; they have been introduced also into South Georgia Is (in 1911-1912 and 1925) and Kerguelen Is (in 1955). in Cervidae

Subspecies and Distribution. R.t.tarandusLinnaeus,1758—Norway. R.t.caribouGmelin,1788—SCanada(fromSYukontoLabradorandNewfoundland)andNWUSA(NEWashington,NIdaho&WMontana). R.t.fennicusLonnberg,1909—FinlandandNWRussia(Karelia). R.t.groenlandicusLinnaeus,1767—Alaska,NCanada,WGreenland. R.t.pearsoniLydekker,1903—NovayaZemlya(Russia). R.t.pearyiJ.A.Allen,1902—CanadianArcticIs. R. t. phylarchus Hollister, 1912 — Russian Far East (Amur region, Okhotsk area, Sakhalin, Kamchatka). R.t.platyrhynchusVrolik,1829—Svalbard(Norway). R.t.sibiricusMurray,1866—NSiberiantundra,RussianArcticIs. R. t. valentinae Flerov, 1933 — Ural Mts (Russia), Altai Mts, Mongolia. Feral Icelandic population originated from animals introduced from Norway in 1771; they have been introduced also into South Georgia Is (in 1911-1912 and 1925) and Kerguelen Is (in 1955).

Subspecies and Distribution. C.n.nipponTemminck,1838—SJapan(SHonshu,Shikoku,Kiushu,NRyukyu,andseveralsmallerassociatedIs). C.n.centralisKishida,1936—CJapan(N&CHonshu). C.n.grassianusHeude,1884—NChina(Shanxi);possiblyextinctinthewild. C.n.kopschiSwinhoe,1873—SEChina. C.n.mandarinusMilne-Edwards,1871—NChina(Hebei&Shandong);possiblyextinctinthewild. C.n.mantschuricusSwinhoe,1864—Ussuriland(RussianFarEast),NEChina(Heilongjiang),andpossiblyNorthKorea. C.n.pseudaxisGervais,1841—NVietnam;probablyextinctinthewild. C.n.sichuanicusGuo,Cheng&Wang,1978—SWChina(Sichuan&Gansu). C.n.taiouanusBlyth,1860—Taiwan. C. n. yesoensis Heude, 1884 — N Japan (Hokkaido). It was anciently introduced to Solo I (Philippines) and in 17" century to Kerama Is (Ryukyu Is, Japan). Also introduced in 19" and 20" centuries into British Is, mainland Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Poland, western Russia, and Ukraine), Armenia, Azerbaijan, Madagascar, New Zealand, and USA. in Cervidae

Subspecies and Distribution. C.n.nipponTemminck,1838—SJapan(SHonshu,Shikoku,Kiushu,NRyukyu,andseveralsmallerassociatedIs). C.n.centralisKishida,1936—CJapan(N&CHonshu). C.n.grassianusHeude,1884—NChina(Shanxi);possiblyextinctinthewild. C.n.kopschiSwinhoe,1873—SEChina. C.n.mandarinusMilne-Edwards,1871—NChina(Hebei&Shandong);possiblyextinctinthewild. C.n.mantschuricusSwinhoe,1864—Ussuriland(RussianFarEast),NEChina(Heilongjiang),andpossiblyNorthKorea. C.n.pseudaxisGervais,1841—NVietnam;probablyextinctinthewild. C.n.sichuanicusGuo,Cheng&Wang,1978—SWChina(Sichuan&Gansu). C.n.taiouanusBlyth,1860—Taiwan. C. n. yesoensis Heude, 1884 — N Japan (Hokkaido). It was anciently introduced to Solo I (Philippines) and in 17" century to Kerama Is (Ryukyu Is, Japan). Also introduced in 19" and 20" centuries into British Is, mainland Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Poland, western Russia, and Ukraine), Armenia, Azerbaijan, Madagascar, New Zealand, and USA.

FIGURES 30–40 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 30–40. DIC micrographs of Cosmolaelaps latisetis Joharchi sp. nov., female. 30, idiosoma in dorsal view; 31, idiosoma in ventral view; 32, general view of some podonotal setae; 33, general view of some opisthonotal setae; 34, general view of opisthogastric area; 35, distal portion of palp, with a focus on tarsal claw; 36, subcapitulum; 37, dorsal aspect of femur, genu and tibia leg I; 38, ventral aspect of femur, genu and tibia leg I; 39, chelicera; 40, anal shield.

FIGURE 41–44 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURE 41–44. Cosmolaelaps latisetis Joharchi sp. nov., female. 41, leg I (trochanter-tibia); 42, leg II; 43, leg III; 44, leg IV.

FIGURES 25–26 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 25–26. Cosmolaelaps latisetis Joharchi sp. nov., female. 25, dorsal idiosoma; 26, ventral idiosoma. Enlarged sections not to scale.

FIGURE 21–24 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURE 21–24. Cosmolaelaps lasiophilus Joharchi sp. nov., female. 21, leg I (trochanter-tibia); 22, leg II; 23, leg III; 24, leg IV.

FIGURES 13–20 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 13–20. DIC micrographs of Cosmolaelaps lasiophilus Joharchi sp. nov., female. 13, idiosoma in dorsal view; 14, idiosoma in ventral view; 15, general view of some podonotal setae; 16, general view of some opisthonotal setae; 17, general view of part of opisthogastric area; 18, subcapitulum; 19, distal portion of palp, with focus on tarsal claw; 20, insemination structures.

FIGURES 27–29 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 27–29. Cosmolaelaps latisetis Joharchi sp. nov., female. 27, subcapitulum; 28, epistome; 29, chelicera.

FIGURES 45–49 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 45–49. DIC micrographs of Cosmolaelaps sejongi Keum, Jung and Joharchi, female. 45, idiosoma in dorsal view; 46, idiosoma in ventral view; 47, general view of some opisthonotal setae; 48, sternal and genital shields; 49, general view of opisthogastric area.

FIGURES 1–7 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 1–7. DIC micrographs of Cosmolaelaps chianensis (Gu), female. 1, idiosoma in dorsal view, enlarged section not to scale; 2, idiosoma in ventral view; 3, sternal shield; 4, general view of opisthogastric area; 5, chelicera; 6, dorsal aspect of femur, genu and tibia leg I; 7, ventral aspect of femur, genu and tibia leg I.

FIGURES 8–12 in New species and new records of Cosmolaelaps Berlese (Acari: Laelapidae) from Russia, with a review of the Russian species of the genus

FIGURES 8–12. Cosmolaelaps lasiophilus Joharchi sp. nov., female. 8, dorsal idiosoma, enlarged section not to scale; 9, ventral idiosoma; 10, subcapitulum; 11, epistome; 12, chelicera.

FIGURES 13–17 in A new water mite species of the genus Arrenurus Dugès, 1834 (Acari, Hydrachnidia: Arrenuridae) from Russia

FIGURES 13–17. Arrenurus udalzowi sp. n., male:13, petiole; 14, pedipalp; 15, IV-Leg-4–6; 16, claw of legII; 17, claw of leg IV. Scale bars: 14, 13, 16–17 = 50 μm, 15 = 200 μm.