Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 3. Left fifth metacarpal (UAHMP-4222) of Panthera atrox from the late Pleistocene of southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico. (a) Ventral, (b) dorsal, (c) medial, (d) lateral, (e) proximal, and (f) distal views. Scale bar equals 2 cm.

Figure 5 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 5. Geographic distribution of Panthera atrox in North America during the late Pleistocene (main source: KurtØn and Anderson, 1980). The gray silhouette indicates the record from southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico.

Figure 7 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 7. Mexican Pleistocene localities with records of felids. The map is regionalized in the morphotectonic provinces of Ferrusquía-Villafranca (1993). Abbreviations of the morphotectonic provinces as in Table 3. Squares indicate the early Pleistocene localities and circles the late Pleistocene localities. The felid record includes the following species: A: Panthera atrox; B: Panthera onca; C: Puma concolor; D: Puma yagouaroundi; E: Lynx rufus; F: Leopardus pardalis; G: Leopardus wiedii; H: Smilodon fatalis; I: Smilodon cf. S. gracilis; J: Felis rexroadensis; K: Miracinonyx inexpectatus.

Figure 6 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 6. Mexican Pleistocene localities with records of Panthera atrox, considering (a) a hypsometric base and (b) the Mexican biogeographic corridors (sensu Ceballos et al., 2010). Diamond indicates the record from southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico. Biogeographic corridors: 1, eastern US–Sierra Madre Oriental; 2, western US–Baja California; 3, Rocky Mountains–Sierra Madre Occidental; 4, central US–northern Mexico; 5, Transvolcanic Belt– Sierra Madre del Sur; 6, Tamaulipas–Central America Gulf Lowlands; and 7, Sonora–Central America Pacific Lowlands.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Figure 1 in Review of nematode interactions with hemp (Cannabis sativa)

Figure 1: Time chart of primary literature reporting root-knot nematode-Cannabis sativa associations. Mh, Meloidogyne hapla; Mi, M. incognita; Mj, M. javanica.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Figure 3 in Review of nematode interactions with hemp (Cannabis sativa)

Figure 3: Chemicals isolated from Cannabis sativa roots. (A) Phytosterols. (B) Triterpenoids. (C) Cannabinoids: - (−)-trans-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); cannabidiol (CBD); cannabidiolic acid (CBDA). (D) Nitrogen-containing compounds.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Figure 2 in Review of nematode interactions with hemp (Cannabis sativa)

Figure 2: Galling of Meloidogyne incognita on Cannabis sativa 'Cherry', Pi = 10,000 eggs. (A) Entire root system. (B) Closeup of small, white galls. Scale = 5 mm.

Figure 5 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies

Figure 5. Ranked bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) catches among river strata based on (a) catch rates, (b) precision (relative standard error), and (c) catch rates + precision. Errors bars are 1 standard error for the averaged ranking for each gear type. Habitat strata are abbreviated according to Wilcox 1993. BW = Backwater, IMP = Impounded, MCB = Main channel border, SC = Secondary channel, TRI = tributary TW = Tailwater.

Figure 4 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies

Figure 4. Ranked bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) catches in capture gears based on (a) catch rates, (b) precision (relative standard error), (c) catch rates + precision, and (d) catch rates + precision scores adjusted by labor (person days). Errors bars are 1 standard error for the averaged ranking for each gear type.

Figure 3 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies

Figure 3. Box-and-whisker plots of the total length (mm) of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) captured using active and passive sampling methods. Whiskers extend to the range of that data. Black lines in each box denote the median length value of that box.

Figure 2 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies

Figure 2. Distribution of bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) data that was included in this study. Shaded portions of the map represent locations included in the analyses with bigheaded carp capture data.

Figure 1 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies

Figure 1. Conceptual representation of the gear performance matrices used to evaluate gear catch rates or gear precision in differing river strata. (Step 1) Each cell (representing gear by strata) was assigned a score (see methods). Averages (± SE) across river strata and gear types (see dashed arrows) were used to compare gear performance. (Step 2) Scores from each matrix were summed to create a third matrix representing the combined Catch rates and Precision attributes.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Figure 1 in A review of nonlethal and lethal control tools for managing the damage of invasive birds to human assets and economic activities

Figure 1. The number of studies (i.e., field, lab, and modeling) using A) lethal methods to control populations at nesting, foraging, loafing, and roosting sites, B) nonlethal methods to control damage at urban nesting, foraging, loafing, and roosting sites, and C) nonlethal methods to control damage at agricultural foraging sites, including those conducted in the native or introduced ranges of the following birds considered invasive in the United States: rock doves (Columba livia; RODO), Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto; EUCD), rose-ringed parakeets (Psittacula krameri; RRPA), monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus; MOPA), common mynas (Acridotheres tristis; COMY), European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris; EUST), and house sparrows (Passer domesticus; HOSP). Above each column on the left-hand side is the number of studies that were conducted in the field (i.e., not laboratory or modeling studies; if a study used multiple tools it was counted for each tool). The right-hand side is the subset of field studies for each category (D–F) that included damage assessments in the results.

BEYOND_WP1_T1.1_Literature review_overview of literature list and Analysis.

Data sets for D1.1. The first part of this deliverable is a scoping review of the literature examining 147 articles published  in peer review academic journals over the past ten years (2013-2023) on the promotion of research  ethics and integrity (REI), and breaches of these standards including research misconduct (RM) and  questionable research practices (QRPs). It also identifies current challenges, gaps in knowledge and  practice, and opportunities for both further research, and policy and educational interventions to  promote REI and mitigate RM and QRPs. Findings on state-of-the-art knowledge in REI research  suggest some areas of consensus, including on the greater risks for early career researchers to commit  RM and the value of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training, particularly approaches that  emphasize ethical problem-solving skills. However, the study also identified a lack of consensus in  other areas, including the rehabilitation and reintegration of researchers who committed RM. Key  findings extracted from the review contribute to the understanding that the environment in which  researchers operate and other contextual factors significantly influence RCR, rather than primarily the  individual behavior of researchers. As such, these environmental and contextual factors require further  research and policy attention.

Fig. 29 in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 29. Heat map of provinces according to the frequency of species within the Endemic chorotype group.

Fig. 28 in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 28. Heat map of provinces according to the frequency of species within the Turanian chorotype group.

Fig. 27 in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 27. Heat map of provinces according to the frequency of species within the Local chorotype group.

Fig. 25 in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 25. Heat map of provinces according to the frequency of species within the Mediterranean chorotype group.

Fig. 30. t in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 30. t-SNE plot of provinces analyzed for the composition of chorotype groups, excluding Alien and Widespread.

Fig. 22 in Review of the Heteroptera (Hemiptera) fauna of Turkey: perspectives for future research

Fig. 22. Ribautocapsus tezcani Çerçi sp. nov. A. Holotype, ♂ (LEMT). B. Paratype, ♀ (LEMT). C. Head, pronotum and scutellum from lateral view, paratype, ♀ (LEMT). D. Head from lateral view, paratype, ♀ (LEMT). E. Right paramere, paratype, ♂ (LEMT). F. Left paramere, paratype, ♂ (LEMT). G. Vesica, paratype, ♂ (LEMT). H. Pygophore from dorsal view, paratype, ♂ (LEMT). E, F and G are to scale with each other. Scale bar: A–B = 1 mm