Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The bivalve Pholadomya gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, taphonomy, and paleogeographic implications

Fig. 5. Stratigraphic log of the Agrio Formation in Agua de la Mula locality (Neuquén Basin, Argentina) showing the occurrence of Pholadomya gigantea (J. de C. Sowerby, 1836) and CPBA number. Ammonite zonation and age from Aguirre−Urreta and Rawson (1997, 2003).

Fig. 9 in The bivalve Pholadomya gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, taphonomy, and paleogeographic implications

Fig. 9. Palaeobiogeography of Pholadomya gigantea (Sowerby, 1836) during the Early Cretaceous. Hauterivian–Barremian palaeocoastline map from Smith et al. (1994); records of Pholadomya gigantea are compiled in Appendix 1.

Fig. 3 in The bivalve Pholadomya gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, taphonomy, and paleogeographic implications

Fig. 3. Orientations of measurements in Pholadomya. A. Left lateral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Posterior view. Abbreviations: Al, anterior length; H, height; Hs, height of siphonal gape; L, length; W, width; Ws, width of siphonal gape. Measurements in Table 1.

Fig. 8 in The bivalve Pholadomya gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, taphonomy, and paleogeographic implications

Fig. 8. Inferred life position of Pholadomya gigantea (Sowerby, 1836) from the Early Cretaceous of the Neuquén Basin, west−central Argentina. A passive deep burrowing habit is interpreted for this species, which has a large pallial sinus, siphonal gape, and thin posterior elongated shell. Angle between the shell and the sediment−water interface may be variable. Soft parts from Morton (1980).

Fig. 4. Diacrodian acritarch Lusatia dendroidea Burmann, 1970 in Late Cambrian acritarch Lusatia: Taxonomy, palaeogeography, and biostratigraphic implications

Fig. 4. Diacrodian acritarch Lusatia dendroidea Burmann, 1970 emended + herein. Upper Cambrian, El Fabar tunnel, Cantabrian Zone, Spain. All specimens from sample Tun−Filocar. For each illustrated specimen slide number, repository number, and England Finder Graticule are given. All specimens with three processes. A. Stub LU2, MGM−1080K, R42; specimen with subtriangular vesicle (A1), detail of branching of antapical process, with curly terminations (A2). B. Slide ›10/1, MGM−1081K, N36/3, specimen with thick−walled vesicle and excystement by median split. C. Slide II/1, MGM−1082K, P29, specimen showing base of processes slightly constricted simulating a sort of plug. D. Slide ›10/1, MGM−1083K, U44/4, specimen with darker central area extending as a spine into the base of the processes. E. Stub 6, MGM−1084K, O45, specimen with an auxiliary filament. F. Slide ›10/1, MGM−1085K, M28, specimen with a thick−walled vesicle and distal loop of apical process. G. Slide ›10/1, MGM−1086K, E44. H. Slide ›10/3, MGM−1087K, P30/4, specimen with a thick−walled vesicle and excystement by median split.

Fig. 2. A in Late Cambrian acritarch Lusatia: Taxonomy, palaeogeography, and biostratigraphic implications

Fig. 2. A. Map of the October Revolution Island, Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago showing position of the fossil locality (star). B. A summary lithological column (B) with stratigraphic position of the horizon yielding the studied acritarchs (asterisk).

Fig. 1. A in Late Cambrian acritarch Lusatia: Taxonomy, palaeogeography, and biostratigraphic implications

Fig. 1. A. Map of the Asturian coast showing position of El Fabar fossil locality (star). B. A summary lithological column with stratigraphic position of the acritarch yielding sample (Tun−Filocar, asterisk).

Fig. 6 in Late Cambrian acritarch Lusatia: Taxonomy, palaeogeography, and biostratigraphic implications

Fig. 6. Late Cambrian palaeogeographic map (based on Scotese 2002). Numbers on the map refer to the known locations where Lusatia dendroidea has been recorded. 1, Jaroslav region, Russia (Volkova 1990); 2, Eastern Newfoundland, Canada (Parsons and Anderson 2000); 3, October Revolution Island, Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago (Raevskaya and Golubkova 2006); 4, Cantabrian zone, Spain (Albani et al. 2006); 5, Rocroi Massif, France (Ribecai and Vanguestaine 1993); 6, Sardinia, Italy (Ribecai et al. 2005); 7, Saxo−Thuringia, Germany (Burmann 1970); 8, Oman (Molyneux et al. 2004).

openmit-licenseJun 2024View details →

The data for Radar Circular Polarization Ratio of Near-Earth Asteroids: Links to Spectral Taxonomy and Surface Processes

README % ========================================================================= % Project: "Radar Circular Polarization Ratio of Near-Earth Asteroids: Links to  % Spectral Taxonomy and Surface Processes" % Author: Edgard G. Rivera-Valentín % Institution: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory % Email: edgard.rivera-valentin@jhuapl.edu % ORCID: 0000-0002-0786-7307 % Date: 18 September 2024 % ========================================================================= % ========================================================================= % Licenses: % Any software provided in this repository is licenced under the MIT License, detailed below and within % this archive.  % Any data provided in this repository is licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International,  % detailed within this archive.  % % MIT License % % Copyright (c) 2024 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC % % Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy % of this software, data, and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal % in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights % to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell % copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is % furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: % % The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in % all copies or substantial portions of the Software. % % THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR % IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, % FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE % AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER % LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, % OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN % THE SOFTWARE. % % ADDITIONAL LICENSING INFORMATION: % Any reuse of the figures and data provided in this repository must abide by  % the Copyright policy of the American Astronomical Society Journals: % https://journals.aas.org/article-charges-and-copyright/#AAS_material % ========================================================================= % ========================================================================= % Description: % This is a data repository for the manuscript published in the Planetary % Science Journal: % Title = Radar Circular Polarization Ratio of Near-Earth Asteroids: Links  % to Spectral Taxonomy and Surface Processes % Please see the Zenodo metadata for detailed publicatoin information. % This repository includes: % (1) A csv file that has the table of data used in the published work. The % table includes the data for each near-Earth asteroid used in the % anlaysis. The header information includes: Asteroid Number, Designation % or Name, Taxonomic Type (Following the Bus-DeMeo classification system), % CPR (where CPR is circular polarization ratio), CPR uncertainty (where % the uncertainty is the 1-sigma value), a (where a is semi-major axis in % au), q (where q is the perihelion distance in au), Q (where Q is the % aphelion distance in au), P (where P is the rotational period in hours), % Hmag (where Hmag is the absolute magnitude), and Orbital Class.  % (2) A .mrt file that contains the same data as the csv file, but formatted % according to the specifications of the machine-readable table format % used by the AAS Journals. The .mrt version will also be published with % the final PSJ article. % (3) .mat files containing the output from the statistical modeling % presented in the paper. These files are required to run the .m file % included in this repository. % (4) Make Figures.m, which is a Matlab code that remakes all the figures % presented in the paper given the data in each of the .mat files.  % (5) The .png files for each of the figures presented in the paper.  % ========================================================================= % ========================================================================= % File Formats: % This archive includes various file formats.  % .csv file is a text file format that uses commas to separate values, and % newlines to separate records.  % .mrt file is an ASCII byte-by-byte format that is documented here: % https://journals.aas.org/mrt-overview/ % and readable by tools such as astropy, TOPCACT, etc.  % .m file is a simple text file used by Matlab, it can be opened by any % text editor and executed by Matlab.  % .mat file is the file format used by MATLAB for saving data. It can be % ready by other software, such as python, e.g.,  % https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.io.loadmat.html % .png file is short for Portable Network Graphic, which is a type of % raster image file.  % =========================================================================

FIG. 1 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 1. — Collecting sites; for definitions of the five ecological zones, see text. For the locality data, see Table 1. Abbreviation: EZ, ecological zone.

FIG. 14 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 14. — Dendrogram of the distribution using Ward method of amphibian species of Togo present in the different ecosystems.

FIG. 5 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 5. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A-C, Afrixalus dorsalis (Peters, 1875): A, B, (Togbekope); C, (Akloa); D, Afrixalus vittiger (Peters, 1876) male (Kalaré); E, Afrixalus weidholzi (Mertens, 1938) (Guérin Kuka); F, Hyperolius baumanni Ahl, 1931 (Diguendue).

FIG. 10 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 10. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, B, Hyperolius torrentis Schiøtz, 1967: A, (Kalaré); B, (Diguengué); C, Hyperolius sylvaticus Schiøtz, 1967 (Diguengué); D, Kassina fusca Schiøtz, 1967 (Bounako); E, Kassina schioetzi RÖdel, Grafe, Rudolf & Ernst, 2002 (Tsévié); F, Kassina senegalensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1841) (Tsévié).

FIG. 13 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 13. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, Ptychadena pumilio (Boulenger, 1920) (Mango); B, Ptychadena tellinii (Peracca, 1904) (Koui); C, Aubria subsigillata (Duméril, 1856) (Kovié); D, Hylarana galamensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1841) (Avévé); E, Hylarana parva (Griesbaum, Jongsma, Penner, Kouamé, Doumbia, Gonwouo, Hillers, Glos, Blackburn & RÖdel, 2023) (Diguengue); F, Geotrypetes seraphini (Duméril, 1859) (Agou).

FIG. 4 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 4. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854) (Kalaré, Fazao Malfakassa); B, Sclerophrys regularis (Reuss, 1833) (Adjarala); C, Sclerophrys togoensis (Ahl, 1924) (Diguendue); D, Conraua derooi Hulselmans, 1972 (Yikpa-Dzigbe); E, Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Günther, 1859) (Akloa); F, Hemisus marmoratus (Peters, 1854) (Kpalimé).

FIG. 9 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 9. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A-D, Hyperolius nitidulus Peters, 1875: A, (N'Gambi); B, C, (Karalé); D, (Bounako).

FIG. 2 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 2. — Some Togolese ecosystems: A, shrubby savannah in Oti-Kéran National Park in rainy season (near Gando, EZ I); B, shrubby savannah in Oti-Kéran National Park in dry season (Naboulgou, Otikera National Park, EZ I); C, wooded savannah in Fazao Malfakassa National Park (EZ II); D, dense dry forest in Alibi Community forest (EZ III); E, semi-deciduous forest in Akloa (EZ IV); F, semi-deciduous forest in a valley, surrounded by montane grassy savannah in Yikpa-Dzigbe (EZ IV); G, dense semi-deciduous forest in the Dévé area in Togodo National Park (EZ V); H, meadows and Mangroves (EZ V).

FIG. 12 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 12. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, Phrynomantis microps Peters, 1875 (Tsévié); B, Xenopus fischbergi Evans, Carter, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Kelley, McLaughlin, Pauwels, Portik, Stanley, Tinsley, Tobias & Blackburn, 2015 (Siou); C, Xenopus tropicalis (Gray, 1864) (Agoté); D, Ptychadena bibroni (Hallowell, 1845) (Kovié); E, Ptychadena mascareniensis (Duméril & Bibron, 1841) (Kovié); F, Ptychadena oxyrhynchus (Smith, 1849) (Tchamba),

FIG. 11 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 11. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, Phrynobatrachus calcaratus (Peters, 1863) (Kalaré); B, Phrynobatrachus francisci Boulenger, 1912 (Mango); C, Phrynobatrachus gutturosus (Chabanaud, 1921) (Assoukoko); D, Phrynobatrachus latifrons (Ahl, 1924) (Akloa); E, Phrynobatrachus natalensis (Smith, 1849) (Koui); F, Phrynobatrachus plicatus (Günther, 1859) (Assoukoko).

FIG. 6 in Amphibians of Togo: taxonomy, distribution and conservation status

FIG. 6. — Representatives of anuran species from Togo in life: A, B, Hyperolius concolor (Hallowell, 1844) males (Kalaré); C, Hyperolius fusciventris burtoni (Boulenger, 1883) female (Togblekope); D, Hyperolius igbettensis Schiøtz, 1963 (Kpeisolongo).