Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 11. Morphological differences between species of Schwarzia. (A) Mesosoma of S. gretae in lateral view (♀, paratype). Left arrow points to the produced, lamellate axilla. Right arrow points to the produced, dorsally protruding metanotum. (B) Posterior dorsolateral view of S. icipensis (♀, paratype).The axillae are not produced or lamellate. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 8 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 8. Male paratype of Schwarzia icipensis sp. nov. (A) Habitus, dorsal view. (B) Habitus, frontal view. (C) Habitus, lateral view. (D) Label information as deposited with the paratype. (E) Details ofT7. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 10 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 10. Characteristic morphological features of different species of Schwarzia. (A) Head of female S. emmae, anterior dorsolateral view.The upper two arrows point to granulose protrusions on the supra-antennal area, the lower arrow points to the indented inner margin of the compound eye. (B) Female paratype of S. gretae in same view.The supra-antennal area is evenly punctate and the inner margin of the compound eye is not indented. (C) Details ofT1–T2 of S. icipensis (♀, paratype). (D) Details ofT1–T2 of S. gretae (♀, paratype). Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 7. Female holotype of Schwarzia icipensis sp. nov. (A) Habitus, dorsal view. (B) Habitus, frontal view. Arrow points to region of supra-antennal area with slightly less dense punctation than surroundings. (C) Habitus, lateral view. (D) Details ofT4–T5. (E) Label information as deposited with the holotype. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 9 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 9. Male holotype of Schwarzia lualenyiensis sp. nov. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Habitus, frontal view. (C) Habitus, dorsal view. (D) Details of T7. (E) Label information as deposited with the holotype. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 6. Male paratype of Schwarzia gretae sp. nov. (A) Habitus, lateral view. Left arrow points to the lamellate axilla. Right arrow points to the produced, dorsally protruding metanotum. (B) Habitus, frontal view. Arrows point to produced ridges along the mesoscutellar line. (C) Habitus, dorsal view. (D) Details ofT6–T7. (E) Label information as deposited with the paratype. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 5. Female holotype of Schwarzia gretae sp. nov. (A) Habitus, dorsal view. (B) Habitus, frontal view. (C) Habitus, lateral view. (D) Label information as deposited with the holotype. (E) Details ofT4–T5. Scale bars show 1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 4. Habitat photographs of Schwarzia collecting sites in Kenya.(A) Ukasi Hill, November 2011.Specimens of S. elizabethae and paratypes of S.gretae and S. icipensis were collected in the area during this month. (B) Ukasi Hill, April 2018.The holotype and paratypes of S. gretae were collected near the Hill in April and May. Pictured from left to right are field worker Ken Katinga Ngalu, technical assistant Josephat Bukhebi, technician Joseph Gitau Ndungu, and field worker Richard Maithyia Munyao. (C) Mulu Musingila's farm in Kitui Co. nearTsavo East National Park. Standing next to the trap is farm owner and field worker Mulu Musingila. Schwarzia elizabethae and S. emmae were collected on the farm in a Malaise trap (December 2016). (D) Sosoma area, April 2018. Habitat of S. emma. Pictured from left to right are field worker Richard Maithyia Munyao.Technician Joseph Gitau Ndungu,Technical assistant Josephat Bukhebi and field worker Mung'atu Kimanzi Mwanzau.

Fig. 1 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 1. Fossil-calibrated chronogram of Neolarrini in the new sense (including Biastes, Neolarra, Rhopalolemma, Townsendiella and Schwarzia) based on 773 ultraconserved elements. Pie charts show possible ancestral ranges. Individual slices are scaled according to their probability as calculated through BioGeoBEARS. Bootstrap support (BS) values and posterior probabilities are omitted but correspond to 100 and 1.0 for all nodes, except for the branching of Oreopasites which has a lower BS value.Asterisks (*) indicate newly described species. Stem and crown ages of host taxa along the timeline on the left are taken from Cardinal et al. (2018). Scale bars next to specimen photographs indicate 2 mm length.

Fig. 2 in Phylogenomic and Morphological Reevaluation of the Bee Tribes Biastini, Neolarrini, and Townsendiellini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) With Description of Three New Species of Schwarzia

Fig. 2. Summary of phylogenetic relationships of Neolarrini with all described species, except for Neolarra. Solid lines show relationships estimated with molecular data and placements with dashed lines are derived from morphology or taxonomic information. Mapped diagnostic characters are listed in Table 3. Larval morphological characters are indicated by a gray background. Information on bee and floral hosts is taken from various sources (Michener 1936,Torchio et al. 1967, Krombein et al. 1979, Warncke 1981, Warncke 1982, Janzon and Svensson 1984, Westrich 1990, Rozen and McGinley 1991, Rozen et al. 1997, Bogusch 2003, Proshchalykin and Lelej 2004, Rozen et al. 2009, Orr and Griswold 2015, Scheuchl and Willner 2016, Westrich 2018). The higher classification of plants follows the APG IV system (The Angiosperm Phylogeny group 2016). Warncke (1982) also lists Systropha curvicornis and S. planidens as hosts of Biastes emarginatus but the source for this information is unclear and has been doubted by other authors (Westrich 2018). No host information is available for Schwarzia and species for which boxes are gray. Asterisks (*) indicate newly described species.

Figure 8 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 8. Neogyptis fauchaldi sp. nov., specimen from the type locality, transmission electron micrograph of a section through several mature sperm. The sperm have spherical nucleus, flat cap-like acrosome and several spherical mitochondria surrounding the anchoring apparatus and 9 + 2 axoneme. Scale bar = 500 nm.

Figure 11 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 11. Neogyptis hongkongensis sp. nov., scanning electron microscopy photographs of specimens from the type locality. A, anterior end, dorsal view. B, anterior end, ventral view. C, lip pads. D, anterior end, right side. E, median segments, dorsal view. F, median parapodia, anteroventral view, right side. Scale bars: A, B, D, E = 100 Mm, C = 25 Mm, F = 50 Mm.

Figure 5 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 5. Neogyptis carriebowcayi sp. nov., scanning electron microscopy photographs of specimens from the type locality. A, anterior end, dorsal view. B, anterior end, ventral view. C, proboscis opening. D, parapodia segment 5–7, left side, dorsal view. E, parapodia segment 6–8, right side, anteroventral view. F, posterior end, ventral view. Scale bars = A, B, D–F = 100 Mm, C = 50 Mm.

Figure 2 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 2. Neogyptis rosea comb. nov., live relaxed mature female from Bohuslän, Sweden, 10.5 mm long excluding cirri. A, dorsal view. B, ventral view.

Figure 1 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Amphidurini, new tribe, and Neogyptis gen. nov. Majority rule consensus tree from the Bayesian analysis together with support values from the maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses (with the third positions excluded). First node values represent posterior probabilities from the Bayesian analysis, second bootstrap support from the maximum likelihood analysis, and third jackknife support from the parsimony analysis. Asterisks denote 1.0 posterior probabilities or 100% bootstrap support. Only values ± 0.75 and 75%, respectively, are displayed. Branch length of the two outgroups are truncated and the values are instead given within parentheses after the taxon names.

Figure 4 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 4. Neogyptis carriebowcayi sp. nov., dorsal view of live relaxed paratype (SIO-BIC A2475), 3.7 mm long excluding cirri.

Figure 3 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 3. Neogyptis rosea comb. nov., scanning electron microscopy photographs of specimens from Bohuslän, Sweden. A, anterior end, anterodorsal view. B, anterior end, right side. C, median parapodia, anterodorsal view. D, capillary notochaetae with alternating rows of teeth. E, median parapodia, ventral view. Scale bars: A = 250 Mm, C and E 100 Mm, D 10 Mm; A and B same scale.

Figure 9 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 9. Neogyptis hinehina sp. nov., dorsal view of live relaxed paratype (SIO-BIC A2492), 4.5 mm long.

Figure 7 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 7. Neogyptis fauchaldi sp. nov., scanning electron microscopy photographs of specimens from the type locality. A, anterior end, dorsal view. B, anterior end, ventral view. C, anterior end, right side. D, median parapodia, anterodorsal view. E, median parapodia, right side, ventral view. F, posterior end, ventral view. Scale bars: A, B, C, E = 100 Mm, D = 50 Mm, F = 60 Mm.

Figure 13 in A partial revision of Gyptis (Gyptini, Ophiodrominae, Hesionidae, Aciculata, Annelida), with descriptions of a new tribe, a new genus and five new species

Figure 13. Neogyptis vostokensis sp. nov., specimens from the type locality, scanning electron microscopy photographs. A, entire specimen, dorsal view. B, prostomium, dorsal view. C, anterior end, ventral view. D, median parapodia, right side, anterodorsal view. E, segment 5 and 6, right side, anteroventral view. Scale bars: A = 500 Mm, B = 50 Mm, C = 200 Mm, D, E = 100 Mm.