Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
368
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
368 results for “Consensus”
Consensus Statements on Definition, Components and Grading of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06916598. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 10.
IWS Diagnosis Criteria Consensus
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07316894. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy Delphi Consensus
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05373966. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
Consensus Method to Evaluate the Conformity of Prescription of a Chemotherapy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02882178. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Supplemental files for: A consensus view of the proteome of the last universal common ancestor
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Characterizing the consensus residue specificity and surface of Bcl-2 binding to BH3 ligands using the knob-socket model
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: A consensus method for ancestral recombination graphs
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplemental material for: NINDS consensus diagnostic criteria for Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Robustness of consensus is independent from preference diversity among group members in the American cockroach (Periplaneta american)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A consensus phylogenomic approach highlights paleopolyploid and rapid radiation in the history of Ericales
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Consensus forecasting of intertidal seagrass habitat in the Wadden Sea
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set for: Behavioral traits that define social dominance are the same that reduce social influence in a consensus task
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Molecular subtyping of alzheimer’s disease with consensus non-negative matrix factorization
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Amplicon_sorter: a tool for reference-free amplicon sorting based on sequence similarity and for building consensus sequences
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 6. Majority Rules Consensus Tree from the 27 in A revision of the genus Rudolfina Roháček (Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae)
Fig. 6. Majority Rules Consensus Tree from the 27 recovered trees retained from Traditional Search (TNT).
Fig. 2. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia
Fig. 2. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 taxa using five genes (ArgK, CAD, LWRh, Top1, Wg) in a MrBayes analysis. Most of the outgroups are not shown. Above node numbers indicate posterior probability, bootstrap value for MP, and bootstrap value for ML. Data were partitioned by PartitionFinder v.1.1.1 and analyzed using a best fit model for each gene and codon position, with 10 million generations and a burn-in of 25 %.
Data from: A consensus study to define appropriate inaction and inappropriate inertia in the management of hypertensive patients in primary care
Objectives. To elaborate and validate operational definitions for appropriate inaction and for inappropriate inertia in the management of hypertensive patients in primary care. Design. A two-step approach was used to reach a definition consensus. First, nominal groups provided practice-based information on the two concepts. Second, a Delphi procedure was used to modify and validate the two definitions created from the nominal groups results. Participants. 14 French practicing GPs participated in each of the two nominal groups, held in two different areas in France. For the Delphi procedure, 30 academics, international experts in the field, were contacted; 20 agreed to participate, and 19 completed the procedure. Results. Inappropriate inertia was defined as: to not initiate or intensify an antihypertensive treatment for a patient who is not at the blood pressure goals defined for this patient in the guidelines when all following conditions are fulfilled: (1) elevated blood pressure has been confirmed by self-measurement or ambulatory BP monitoring, (2) there is no legitimate doubt on the reliability of the measurements, (3) there is no observance issue regarding pharmacological treatment, (4) there is no specific iatrogenic risk (which alters the risk-benefit balance of treatment for this patient), in particular orthostatic hypotension in the elderly, (5) there is no other medical priority more important and more urgent, (6) access to treatment is not difficult. Appropriate inaction was defined as the exact mirror, i.e. when at least one of the above conditions is not met. Conclusion. Definitions of appropriate inaction and inappropriate inertia in the management of hypertensive patients have been established from empirical practice-based data and validated by an international panel of academics as useful for practice and research.
Data from: Consensus and confusion in Molluscan trees: evaluating morphological and molecular phylogenies
Mollusks are the most morphologically disparate living animal phylum, they have diversified into all habitats, and have a deep fossil record. Monophyly and identity of their eight living classes is undisputed, but relationships between these groups and patterns of their early radiation have remained elusive. Arguments about traditional morphological phylogeny focus on a small number of topological concepts but often without regard to proximity of the individual classes. In contrast, molecular studies have proposed a number of radically different, inherently contradictory, and controversial sister relationships. Here, we assembled a dataset of 42 unique published trees describing molluscan interrelationships. We used these data to ask several questions about the state of resolution of molluscan phylogeny compared to a null model of the variation possible in random trees constructed from a monophyletic assemblage of eight terminals. Although 27 different unique trees have been proposed from morphological inference, the majority of these are not statistically different from each other. Within the available molecular topologies, only four studies to date have included the deep-sea class Monoplacophora; but 36.4% of all trees are not significantly different. We also present supertrees derived from 2 data partitions and 3 methods, including all available molecular molluscan phylogenies, which will form the basis for future hypothesis testing. The supertrees presented here were not constructed to provide yet another hypothesis of molluscan relationships, but rather to algorithmically evaluate the relationships present in the disparate published topologies. Based on the totality of available evidence, certain patterns of relatedness among constituent taxa become clear. The internodal distance is consistently short between a few taxon pairs, particularly supporting the relatedness of Monoplacophora and the chitons, Polyplacophora. Other taxon pairs are rarely or never found in close proximity, such as the vermiform Caudofoveata and Bivalvia. Our results have specific utility for guiding constructive research planning in order to better test relationships in Mollusca as well as other problematic groups. Taxa with consistently proximate relationships should be the focus of a combined approach in a concerted assessment of potential genetic and anatomical homology, while unequivocally distant taxa will make the most constructive choices for exemplar selection in higher-level phylogenomic analyses.
Data from: The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement: methods for arriving at consensus and developing reporting guidelines
Objective: Routinely collected health data, collected for administrative and clinical purposes, without specific a priori research questions, are increasingly used for observational, comparative effectiveness, health services research, and clinical trials. The rapid evolution and availability of routinely collected data for research has brought to light specific issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines. The aim of the present project was to determine the priorities of stakeholders in order to guide the development of the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. Methods: Two modified electronic Delphi surveys were sent to stakeholders. The first determined themes deemed important to include in the RECORD statement, and was analyzed using qualitative methods. The second determined quantitative prioritization of the themes based on categorization of manuscript headings. The surveys were followed by a meeting of RECORD working committee, and re-engagement with stakeholders via an online commentary period. Results: The qualitative survey (76 responses of 123 surveys sent) generated 10 overarching themes and 13 themes derived from existing STROBE categories. Highest-rated overall items for inclusion were: Disease/exposure identification algorithms; Characteristics of the population included in databases; and Characteristics of the data. In the quantitative survey (71 responses of 135 sent), the importance assigned to each of the compiled themes varied depending on the manuscript section to which they were assigned. Following the working committee meeting, online ranking by stakeholders provided feedback and resulted in revision of the final checklist. Conclusions: The RECORD statement incorporated the suggestions provided by a large, diverse group of stakeholders to create a reporting checklist specific to observational research using routinely collected health data. Our findings point to unique aspects of studies conducted with routinely collected health data and the perceived need for better reporting of methodological issues.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.