Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
782
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
782 results for “algae”
Linked collectors and determiners for: Algas pardas (Ochrophyta: Phaeophyceae) de la colección ficológica "Germán Bula Meyer", de la Universidad del Magdalena.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Algas pardas (Ochrophyta: Phaeophyceae) de la colección ficológica "Germán Bula Meyer", de la Universidad del Magdalena". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/c0b4d6ab-21e7-4e07-bb50-d49e899c46dc">https://bionomia.net/dataset/c0b4d6ab-21e7-4e07-bb50-d49e899c46dc</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/c0b4d6ab-21e7-4e07-bb50-d49e899c46dc">https://gbif.org/dataset/c0b4d6ab-21e7-4e07-bb50-d49e899c46dc</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Digitalización y Sistematización de las Colecciones Biológicas Nacionales del Instituto de Biología, UNAM (algas, frutos y semillas, hongos, líquenes, xiloteca).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Digitalización y Sistematización de las Colecciones Biológicas Nacionales del Instituto de Biología, UNAM (algas, frutos y semillas, hongos, líquenes, xiloteca)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/7dcaa915-d51a-4376-b2b3-08fd7aca3f23">https://bionomia.net/dataset/7dcaa915-d51a-4376-b2b3-08fd7aca3f23</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/7dcaa915-d51a-4376-b2b3-08fd7aca3f23">https://gbif.org/dataset/7dcaa915-d51a-4376-b2b3-08fd7aca3f23</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Swiss National Databank of Green Algae (Characeae).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Swiss National Databank of Green Algae (Characeae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/59f14999-c588-4272-b18a-2ef0cc9fc7b5">https://bionomia.net/dataset/59f14999-c588-4272-b18a-2ef0cc9fc7b5</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/59f14999-c588-4272-b18a-2ef0cc9fc7b5">https://gbif.org/dataset/59f14999-c588-4272-b18a-2ef0cc9fc7b5</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Artsprosjektet 43-15, Norway's hidden marine biodiversity: The hunt for cryptic species within the coralline algae.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Artsprosjektet 43-15, Norway's hidden marine biodiversity: The hunt for cryptic species within the coralline algae". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/aef3c42a-7545-439e-bf29-9e0ff95f9ae0">https://bionomia.net/dataset/aef3c42a-7545-439e-bf29-9e0ff95f9ae0</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/aef3c42a-7545-439e-bf29-9e0ff95f9ae0">https://gbif.org/dataset/aef3c42a-7545-439e-bf29-9e0ff95f9ae0</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Fig. 3 in The identity of the carrageenophyte red alga Sarcothalia radula (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta)
Fig. 3. Epitype of Fucus radula: WELT No. A034575, Dusky Sound, Chalky Inlet, 14 Dec 2019, G. Keeler-May, CC-BY 4.0, Te Papa.
Fig. 2 in The identity of the carrageenophyte red alga Sarcothalia radula (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta)
Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood topology of the rbcL gene from 'Gigartina' atropurpurea, Sarcothalia circumcincta and S. radula (as S. lanceata in GenBank) and representatives of the Gigartinaceae. All samples sequenced in this study are bold. Outgroups of Mastocarpus spp., were removed to facilitate presentation. Branch support values are given as non-parametric bootstrap, UFbootstrap and SH-aLRT. Values <85% bootstrap, <95% UFbootstrap and <80% SH-aLRT test are not shown. Asterisk represents 100% support.
Local vs. site-level effects of algae on coral microbial communities
<p>Microbes influence ecological processes, including the dynamics and health of macro-organisms and their interactions with other species. In coral reefs, microbes mediate negative effects of algae on corals when corals are in contact with algae. However, it is unknown whether these effects extend to larger spatial scales, such as at sites with high algal densities. We investigated how local algal contact and site-level macroalgal cover influenced coral microbial communities in a field study at two islands in French Polynesia, Mo'orea and Mangareva. At 5 sites at each island, we sampled prokaryotic microbial communities (microbiomes) associated with corals, macroalgae, turf algae, and water, with coral samples taken from individuals that were isolated from or in contact with turf or macroalgae. Algal contact and macroalgal cover had antagonistic effects on coral microbiome alpha and beta diversity. Additionally, coral microbiomes shifted and became more similar to macroalgal microbiomes at sites with high macroalgal cover and with algal contact, although the microbial taxa that changed varied by island<i>.</i> Our results indicate that coral microbiomes can be affected by algae outside of the coral's immediate vicinity, and local- and site-level effects of algae can obscure each other's effects when both scales are not considered. </p>
Appendices B to E for the Thesis: Investigating the Evolution and Ecology of Obscure Bacterial Symbioses found in Invertebrates, Ciliates and Algae
<p><strong>Appendix B1 contains all metadata for genomes assembled and genomes used, including accession numbers, CheckM scores and Gtdbtk taxonomy. You will also find supporting data for Chapter 2.</strong></p> <p><strong>Yellow tabs contain:</strong></p> <ul> <li>accessions and species information for all whole genomes used</li> <li>brief details on hosts and environment for new genomes described in this study</li> <li>metadata such as N50s and genome lengths for all new genomes</li> <li>completeness scores and assembly levels for all genomes</li> <li>information on where all the published genomes were used in this study</li> <li>taxonomy calculations from GTDBtk</li> </ul> <p><strong>Red tabs contain:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Phi scores from reticulate analysis for all core genome clusters extracted from the pangenome aswell as their associated COG and KEGG functions</li> <li>Functional enrichment tables exploring the association of different metabolic functions with different groups of bacteria</li> </ul> <p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p><strong>Appendix C1 contains all metadata for genomes assembled and genomes used, including accession numbers and CheckM scores. You will also find raw data used to produce the figures in Chapter 3.</strong></p> <p><strong>Yellow tabs contain: </strong></p> <p>S1 - Meta data tables for draft genomes examined in this study </p> <p>S2 - Accessions for additional genomes used</p> <p><strong>Red tabs contain: </strong></p> <p>S3 - AAI % similarity across Ca. Megaira used in figure 3a</p> <p>S4 - ANIb % Similarity across Ca. Megaira used in figure 3b</p> <p>S5 - KEGG ko hits </p> <p>S6 - KEGG module completeness used in figure 5 and 6 </p> <p>S7 - 16S rRNA accessions used in phylogeny Figure 2</p> <p>S8 - Gene cluster presence absence matrix used in figure 3.4 and Appendix figure 1 </p> <p>S9 - GTDBtk results for SRA and GenBank Environmental MAGs </p> <p>S10 - top 10 blastp results for RiPP, NRPS and CDPS regions identified by antiSMASH</p> <p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p><strong>Appendix D1 contains all metadata for genomes assembled and genomes used, including accession numbers, CheckM scores and Gtdbtk taxonomy. You will also find raw data used to produce the figures in Chapter 4.</strong></p> <p><strong>Yellow tabs contain:</strong></p> <p>S1 - Metadata for genomes assembled in this study</p> <p>S2 - Metadata for environmental MAGs recovered from NCBI non redundant sequence database</p> <p>S3 - Metadata for additional Chlamydiota genomes used</p> <p><strong>Red tabs contain:</strong></p> <p>S4 - AAI percentage similarity scores used to produce genera similarity networks</p> <p>S5 - ANIb percentage similarity scores used to produce species similarity networks</p> <p>S6 - CRISPRcas finder results</p> <p>S7 - KEGG pathway hits</p> <p>S8 - KEGG pathway completeness</p> <p>S9 - Gene cluster presence absence matrix used in figure 4.3a for Rhabdochlamydiaceae</p> <p>S10 - Gene cluster presence absence matrix used in figure 4.3b for Simkaniaceae</p> <p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p><strong>Appendix E1 contains screening results, environmental data extracted from climate databases and additional genome information.</strong></p> <p><strong>Yellow tabs contain:</strong></p> <p>S1 - 'Ca. Tisiphia' in Anopheles plumbeus across Germany. PCR screening and geographic data</p> <p>S2 - additional genome accessions and metadata</p> <p><strong>Red tabs contain:</strong></p> <p>S3 - KEGG completeness</p> <p>S4 - KEGG ko_hits presence</p> <p> </p>
Fig. 5 A–L in The foraminifera associated with the alga Gelidium pristoides, South Africa
Fig. 5 A–L: (A) Trifarina angulosa (Williamson, 1858); (B) Neoconcorbina sp. "A"; (C, D) Rosalina cf. globularis d'Orbigny, 1826; (E) Rosalina sp. "A"; (F–H) Glabratella australensis (Heron-Allen & Earland, 1932); (I, J) Patellina corrugata Williamson, 1858; (K) Ammonia parkinsoniana (d'Orbigny, 1839); (L) Pararotalia nipponica (Asano, 1936).
Fig. 3 A–L in The foraminifera associated with the alga Gelidium pristoides, South Africa
Fig. 3 A–L: (A, B) Lagena semilineata Wright, 1886; (C) Lagena sulcata Walker & Jacob, 1798; (D) Lagena tenuis (Bornemann, 1855); (E, F) Lagenosolenia sp. "A"; (G–I) Oolina sp. "A"; (J) Oolina melo d'Orbigny, 1839; (K) Oolina squamosulcata (Heron-Allen & Earland, 1922); (L) Fissurina marginata (Montagu, 1803).
Fig. 2 A–L in The foraminifera associated with the alga Gelidium pristoides, South Africa
Fig. 2 A–L: (A) Marsipella sp. "A"; (B) Trochammina squamata Jones & Parker, 1860; (C, D) Quinqueloculina dunkerquiana Heron-Allen & Earland, 1930; (E) Quinqueloculina seminulum (Linné, 1758); (F) Quinqueloculina triangularis d'Orbigny, 1846; (G) Quinqueloculina undulata d'Orbigny, 1852; (H) Quinqueloculina vulgaris d'Orbigny, 1826; (I) Quinqueloculina sp. "A"; (J) Triloculina trigonula (Lamarck, 1804); (K–L) Miliolinella subrotundata (Montagu, 1803).
Fig. 4 A–L in The foraminifera associated with the alga Gelidium pristoides, South Africa
Fig. 4 A–L: (A) Fissurina marginata (Montagu, 1803); (B, C) Fissurina sp. "A"; (D) Guttulina irregularis (d'Orbigny, 1846); (E) Glandulina sp. "A"; (F) Bolivina "fossa" McMillan, 1987 m.s.; (G, H) Bolivina pseudoplicata Heron-Allen & Earland, 1930; (I) Bolivina sp. "A"; (J) Brizalina pseudopunctata (Höglund, 1947); (K) Brizalina "rocklandsensis" McMillan, 1987 m.s.; (L) Bulimina elongata d'Orbigny, 1846.
Figure 3 in Capoeta raghazensis, a new species of algae-scraping cyprinid from the Raghaz Canyon in Hormuz basin, southern Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
Figure 3. Ventral view of Head. Capoeta raghazensis sp. n. (A: IMNRF-UT-1105-4, 114 mm SL, male; B: IMNRF-UT-1105-7, 231 mm SL, female; C: IMNRF-UT-1105-6, 200 mm SL, female; D: IMNRF-UT-1105-4, 111.8 mm SL, male).
Figure 2 in Capoeta raghazensis, a new species of algae-scraping cyprinid from the Raghaz Canyon in Hormuz basin, southern Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
Figure 2. Capoeta raghazensis sp. n., paratypes; A, IMNRF-UT-1105-7; 231 mm SL; B, IMNRF-UT-1105-6; 200 mm SL; C, IMNRF-UT- 1105-4; 114 mm SL.
Figure 2 in Capoeta raghazensis, a new species of algae-scraping cyprinid from the Raghaz Canyon in Hormuz basin, southern Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
Figure 2. Capoeta raghazensis sp. n., IMNRF-UT-1105-4, holotype, 112 mm SL. Iran: Hormuzgan prov., Darab City, Raghaz Canyon, Hormuz basin.
Figure 4 in Capoeta raghazensis, a new species of algae-scraping cyprinid from the Raghaz Canyon in Hormuz basin, southern Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
Figure 4. Raghaz Canyon, near Darab City, Hormuz basin, type locality of Capoeta raghazensis, sp. n..
Microbiome, mixotrophic algae, zooplankton, and fish amino acid and phospholipid fatty acid content in terrestrial and plastic carbon treatments
<p>Data includes amino acid (µg AA mg DW<sup>-1</sup>) and phospholipid fatty acid content (µg FA mg DW<sup>-1</sup>) of the microbiome, mixotrophic algae, zooplankton, and fish<em> </em>from the four-trophic level experiment. The experiment included control (no addition), 13.5% <sup>13</sup>C-labelled beech leaves (<em>Fagus sylvatica</em>), 97% <sup>13</sup>C-labelled lignin-hemicellulose extracted from wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em>, ~80% lignin, 13% hemicellulose), and 99% <sup>13</sup>C-labelled polystyrene (microplastic). Incubation time in humic lake water was 14 days in the control, leaf, and lignin experiment but 56 days for polystyrene, which after mixotrophic algae (<em>Cryptomonas </em>sp.) was introduced to the bottles. In the next step, herbivorous zooplankton (<em>Daphnia magna</em>) consumed microbes, mixotrophic algae, and particles for five days which after they were used as the diet to zebrafish (<em>Danio rerio</em>) during a five-day experiment.</p>
Input and output data for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 4)
<p>The dataset contains:</p> <p>i. the meteorological forcing, hydrological boundary condition and chlorophyll-a files used as an input</p> <p>ii. the model output and skill produced</p> <p>for Experiment B2 (Deliverable 3.3 - Data assimilation in process-based models for algae bloom forecasting - Section 4)</p>
Haliotis tuberculata sp. hatchery and algae settlement cues
<p>Data set of experimental settlement induction of Haliotis tuberculata sp. using red and green algal substrates.</p>
Data for: Kelp forest loss and emergence of turf algae reshapes energy flow to predators in a rapidly warming ecosystem
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.