Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
285
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
285 results for “biogeographic implications”
FIGURE 4 in Discovery of the genus Plethodontohyla (Anura: Microhylidae) in dry western Madagascar: description of a new species and biogeographic implications
FIGURE 4. Map of Madagascar showing the known distribution of Plethodontohyla fonetana (black square), P. guentheri (black triangle) and remaining members of the genus Plethodontohyla (gray dots), excluding those species now placed in Rhombophryne. The latter records also exclude P. guentherpetersi, as its generic placement is uncertain.
FIGURE 1 in Discovery of the genus Plethodontohyla (Anura: Microhylidae) in dry western Madagascar: description of a new species and biogeographic implications
FIGURE 1. Plethodontohyla fonetana, holotype (ZSM 123/2006) in dorsolateral view, photographed in life.
Figure 9 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 9. Antarctoscyphus fragilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b, c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca (lateral view). Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b–d).
Figure 12 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 12. Antarctoscyphus mawsoni (Briggs, 1938): (a) axillary hydrotheca and paired branches showing hydrothecal disposition; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c, d) hydrothecae; (e) detail of hydrothecal aperture. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, c), 200 µm (d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 8 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 8. Antarctoscyphus encarnae Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997: (a) fragment of lateral branch showing hydrothecal arrangement; (b) shape and arrangement of hydrothecae; (c) hydrotheca; (d) gonotheca; (e) detail of gonothecal aperture. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 250 µm (b–d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 4 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 4. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905): (a) paired branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) fragment of distal part of a branch showing shape and arrangement of hydrothecae; (d, e) hydrothecae; (f) detail of hydrothecal distal part, showing cusps. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 500 µm (c), 250 µm (b, d), 50 µm (f).
Figure 3 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 3. Antarctoscyphus asymmetricus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997: (a) fragment of a lateral branch showing hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and origin of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching (note hydrotheca outside axil of branches); (d, e) hydrothecae (note extreme development of one abcauline cusp); (f, g) gonothecae; (h) detail of gonothecal aperture. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, f), 200 µm (g), 150 µm (d, e), 50 µm (h).
Figure 7 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 7. Antarctoscyphus elongatus (Jäderholm, 1904): (a) fragment of a lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) hydrocladial branching (note hydrotheca outside axil of branches); (c) hydrothecae (lateral view); (d) hydrotheca (frontal view); (e) fragment of lateral branch showing branching, hydrothecae and a gonotheca; (f) gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 250 µm (b, c, e, f), 200 µm (d).
Figure 14 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 14. Bathymetric range of the species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997.
Figure 2 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 2. Antarctoscyphus admirabilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (a) two paired branches, showing branch ramification and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis with axillary hydrotheca and basal part of two paired branches; (c, d) hydrothecae; (e) detail of hydrothecal distal part, showing cusps and opercular flaps. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 250 µm (b, c), 150 µm (d), 50 µm (e).
Figure 13 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 13. Antarctoscyphus spiralis (Hickson and Gravely, 1907): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca in lateral view; (e detail of distal part of hydrotheca showing cusps (note two internal cusps); (f) gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 200 µm (b, c, f), 100 µm (d), 25 µm (e).
Figure 11 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 11. Antarctoscyphus gruzovi (Stepanjants, 1979): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) cauline apophysis showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c, d) hydrocladial branching; (e) hydrotheca; (f) detail of distal part of hydrotheca showing opercular flaps. Scale bars: 1 mm (a), 350 µm (c), 200 µm (b, d), 150 µm (e), 50 µm (f).
Figure 10 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 10. Antarctoscyphus grandis (Blanco, 1977): (a) fragment of lateral branch showing branching and hydrothecal arrangement; (b) distal part of cauline internode showing axillary hydrotheca and basal part of paired branches; (c) hydrocladial branching; (d) hydrotheca; (e) fragment of branch showing hydrothecae and gonothecae; (f) detail of distal part of gonotheca. Scale bars: 1 mm (a, b), 500 µm (e), 250 µm (c), 200 µm (d), 50 µm (f).
Figure 6 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 6. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905) (Holotype): (a), cauline hydrothecae showing alternate arrangement; (b) cauline hydrotheca with paired hydrothecae; (c) hydrotheca (frontal view). Scale bars: 250 µm.
Figure 5 in Species of Antarctoscyphus Peña Cantero, García Carrascosa and Vervoort, 1997 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Symplectoscyphidae) collected by US Antarctic expeditions: biogeographic implications
Figure 5. Antarctoscyphus biformis (Jäderholm, 1905): (a–c) hydrothecal shape and arrangement; (d) distal part of hydrotheca showing abcauline internal cusp (arrow). Antarctoscyphus fragilis Peña Cantero, Svoboda and Vervoort, 1999: (e, f) hydrothecae. Scale bar: 200 µm (a–c, e, f), 100 µm (d).
Figure 14 in Species limits within the Praomys delectorum group (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) of East Africa: a morphometric reassessment and biogeographical implications
Figure 14. Fifty-nine major collecting localities of Praomys reported herein, sequentially numbered from north to south. Numbers refer to the localities gazetted in Appendix 1 and to those used to define the 21 OTUs (see Material and Methods).
Figure 13 in Species limits within the Praomys delectorum group (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) of East Africa: a morphometric reassessment and biogeographical implications
Figure 13. Interpretations of area relationship among Tanzanian mountains, as derived from documented occurrences (Appendix 4) of terrestrial small mammals in all montane settings (A, C) or those restricted to montane forest (B, D) and based on two measures of faunal similarity, Sørensen's (A, B) and Raup-Crick's (C, D) indices. Mountain abbreviations: EUS, East Usambara Mts; MAL, Malundwe Mts; NGU, Nguu Mts; NGR, Nguru Mts; NHI, Northern Highlands (Mt Kilimanjaro, Mt Meru, Ngorongoro Crater Highlands); NPA, North Pare Mts; RUB, Rubeho Mts; SHI, Southern Highlands (Livingstone Mts, Poroto Mts, Mt Rungwe); SPA, South Pare Mts; TAI, Taita Hills; UDZ, Udzungwa Mts; UKA, Ukaguru Mts; ULU, Uluguru Mts; WUS, West Usambara Mts.
Figure 12 in Species limits within the Praomys delectorum group (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) of East Africa: a morphometric reassessment and biogeographical implications
Figure 12. Morphometric comparisons of samples of Hylomyscus and Praomys that co-occur in montane forest across the Eastern Arc Mountains (South Pare Mts to Udzungwa Mts) into the Southern Highlands (Livingstone Mts and Mt Rungwe) of Tanzania. Top graphs: north–south transects of morphometric differentiation as indexed by the first canonical variate extracted; vertical lines correspond to the sample range and filled circles to the sample mean (Abbreviations: EUS, East Usambara Mts; LIV, Livingstone Mts; NGR, Nguru Mts; RUN, Mt Rungwe; SPA, South Pare Mts; UDZ, Udzungwa Mts; UKA, Ukaguru Mts; ULU, Uluguru Mts; WUS, West Usambara Mts). Bottom phenograms: Cluster diagrams (UPGMA) based on Mahalanobis squared distances between the nine OTU centroids as derived from discriminant function analysis; only nodes that were consistently recovered by bootstrapping are indicated (± 70%, 1000 iterations), leaving poorly defined levels of phenetic affinity as unresolved. Both multivariate perspectives document abrupt shifts in craniodental differentiation between populations of Praomys coincident with the Makambako Gap (here interpreted as different species, P. melanotus and P. taitae) but not those of Hylomyscus (interpreted as the single species H. arcimontensis by Carleton & Stanley, 2005). See text for discussion.
Figure 11 in Species limits within the Praomys delectorum group (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) of East Africa: a morphometric reassessment and biogeographical implications
Figure 11. Plot of elevational ranges (in metres, above sea level) of Hylomyscus arcimontensis (including localities in the EAM and Southern Highlands) and the three species of the Praomys delectorum species group. Vertical line embraces the elevational range of each species and filled circles indicate elevations of individual collecting localities (see Appendix X).
Figure 9 in Species limits within the Praomys delectorum group (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) of East Africa: a morphometric reassessment and biogeographical implications
Figure 9. Examples of the Praomys delectorum group as photographed in the field: Top, P. melanotus from Ngozi Crater in the Poroto Mountains, Southern Highlands; Bottom, P. taitae from Mount Malundwe, central Eastern Arc Mountains. Darker pigmentation of the epidermal surfaces is typical of individual P. melanotus compared with P. taitae; also note the extension of dark hairs onto the metatarsum as characteristic of P. melanotus versus a wholly white metatarsum and phalanges in most P. taitae. Hindfoot length averages about 23–25 mm; photographs by W. T. Stanley.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.