Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2005View details →

Fig. 1 in Use Of Intertidal Mangrove And Sea Wall Habitats By Coral Reef Fishes In The Wakatobi Marine Park, Indonesia

Fig. 1. Map of study sites. The arrow points to Hoga Island off the northeast coast of Kaledupa Island. The entire Tukangbesi Archipelago lies within the Wakatobi National Marine Park.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Interspecific variation of prevalence by Scaphanocephalus (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Heterophyidae) metacercariae in parrotfishes (Labridae: Scarini) from an Okinawan coral reef

Fig. 1. Cyst of Scaphanocephalus parasite (arrows) infected on the pectoral fins and lateral body skin of parrotfish Chlorurus sordidus.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in Interspecific variation of prevalence by Scaphanocephalus (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Heterophyidae) metacercariae in parrotfishes (Labridae: Scarini) from an Okinawan coral reef

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of genera in Scarini of Labridae (modified from Streelman et al., 2002) and parasite prevalence in each species. *: 100%.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2012View details →

Fig. 2 in The oldest representative of a modern deep-sea ophiacanthid brittle-star clade from Jurassic shallow-water coral reef sediments

Fig. 2. Ophiacanthid brittle−star Ophiosternle crinitum (Quenstedt, 1876), from the Reef debris beds within the Mergelstetten Formation (Hybonoticeras beckeri Zone, Lithacoceras ulmense Subzone), latest Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic of Buchenbrunnen near Steinenfeld, S−Germany. A. GPIT/69/96−24 (holotype). Detail of proximal arm segments in ventral view without arm spines (A1) and with arm spines (A2). B. 96/23 (paratype). Arm fragment in ventral view (B1), proximal arm segments in lateral view (B2). C. GPIT/AS/56 (paratype). Complete specimen (C1) and detail of proximal to median arm segments (C2) in dorsal view.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2012View details →

Fig. 1 in The oldest representative of a modern deep-sea ophiacanthid brittle-star clade from Jurassic shallow-water coral reef sediments

Fig. 1. Ophiacanthid brittle−star Ophiosternle crinitum (Quenstedt, 1876), GPIT/69/96−24 (holotype), from the Reef debris beds within the Mergelstetten Formation (Hybonoticeras beckeri Zone, Lithacoceras ulmense Subzone), latest Kimmeridgian, Late Jurassic of Buchenbrunnen near Steinenfeld, S−Germany. A. Complete specimen in ventral view. B. Detail of dorsal side showing arm base and distal tip of radial shields. C. Detail of disc in dorsal view. D, E. Detail of disc in ventral view; photograph (D) and explanatory drawing (E).

Figure 8 in Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa

Figure 8. Large coral colonies thrive on solid reef rock blocks in the field of rubble. This demonstrates that substratum stability is the key determining factor under relatively uniform conditions of water quality and larval recruitment.

Figure 2 in Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa

Figure 2. Water quality in inner Pago Pago Harbor greatly improved and remained improved after tuna canneries were required to modify their waste disposal processes in 1991. Data were taken by the American Samoa Environmental Protection Agency and the figure is from Craig et al. 2005 with permission.

Figure 1 in Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa

Figure 1. Acropora exposed at low tide on Alfred Mayor's transect near Aua in Pago Pago Harbor in 1917 (reprinted from Mayor 1924 with permission of the Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC).

Figure 3 in Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa

Figure 3. Density of corals from 1917 to 2007 along the Aua transect from the shore to the reef crest.

Figure 9 in Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa

Figure 9. Unattached colonies of Pavona divaricata and Porites cylindrica with living tissue on all sides.

Fig. 3 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 3. Hettangian (Early Jurassic) zardinophyllid coral Cryptosepta gen. nov. from Ucel, Ardèche, France. A. Holotype (sample S6; MHNG 2013-34), global view of the colony. Corallites can be observed on both faces of the sample (A1, A2). B. Holotype (sample S6c; MHNG 2013-37), transverse and longitudinal corallite sections (B1); transverse section, juvenile stage (B2), characterised by a thick wall and only one septum (white arrow). C. Corallite sample MG156c; MHNG 2013-40), transverse and longitudinal sections (C1); transverse section, adult stage (C2), characterised by a fine wall and relatively high number of septa. The septa are long and fine as well as short and thick.

Fig. 2 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic distribution of pachythecal corals and related genera inspired from Stolarski and Russo (2001) and modified. As an approximation, a vertical bar indicates a full stage when such corals were identified in the stage. When a single stage lacks such corals between two stages with such corals, the black bar was elongated. By approximation, Štramberk limestone was considered Tithonian. This figure shows only the Triassic– Jurassic range of Pachythecaliines but most of Jurassic genera occur also in the Cretaceous.

Fig. 5 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 5. Scheme illustrating the diagnostic parameters that characterise Cryptosepta nuda gen. et sp. nov.

Fig. 4 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 4. Hettangian (Early Jurassic) zardinophyllid coral Cryptosepta gen. nov. from Ucel, Ardèche, France. A. Corallite (sample MG156b; MHNG 2013- 39), longitudinal section showing the septa deeply hidden in the corallite. B. Holotype (sample S6b; MHNG 2013-36), longitudinal section (B 1), showing lateral budding with the parental (p) and daughter corallite (d), tabula (arrow) with septa developed on its upper surface; transverse section (B 2), young stage of lateral budding with the parental (p) and daughter corallite (d). C. Corallite (sample MG156d; MHNG 2013-41), transverse section, advanced lateral budding stage with the parental (p) and daughter corallite (d). D. Holotype (sample S6a; MHNG 2013-35), longitudinal section (D 1), rejuvenescence indicated through calicinal aperture retraction (white arrow), which facilitated new septa (grey arrows); transverse section in detail (D 2), septa morphologies: short and thick, which form a "tooth" shape (a) or thinner and curved (b), fine layer (fi) covering the internal part of the theca (ip). E. Holotype sample S6c; MHNG 2013-37), transverse section in detail, fine external epithecal layer (arrow) separated from the massive thecal structure.

Fig. 1 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 1. Geographic location for Elmi's reef (A, modified from Elmi et al. 1993) and position of the locality near Ucel, Ardèche (B), samples corresponding to the new genus Cryptosepta indicated by black arrow (modified from Kiessling et al. 2009).

Fig. 6 in A new coral with simplified morphology from the oldest known Hettangian (Early Jurassic) reef in southern France

Fig. 6. Pachythecal structure of the walls of the Hettangian (Early Jurassic) zardinophyllid corallite Cryptosepta gen. nov. (sample S6a; MHNG 2013- 35) from Ucel, Ardèche, France. A. A relatively well-preserved wall that reveals structures in some places (arrow) that may correspond to the original fibre-like structures. B. The fibre-like structures in detail.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2016View details →

Figure 1. - A in Possible collapse of reef shark populations in remote coral reef ecosystems in the Coral Sea (Western Pacific)

Figure 1. - A: Location of the Chesterfield and Bampton reefs in a central position among the Coral Sea, between the Australian Eastern coast and New Caledonia. B: Close up of the reefs where the 2010 and 2011 field trips were conducted; specific spots for shark surveys are shown with circles around the Bampton Reefs. C: Close up on the Chesterfield reefs with circles showing the locations for fishing and underwater visual surveys.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Possible collapse of reef shark populations in remote coral reef ecosystems in the Coral Sea (Western Pacific)

Figure 3. - Comparison of average sizes of grey reef shark (C. amblyrhynchos) assessed through underwater visual censuses during the 2010 (blue) and 2011 (orange) field trips. In order to facilitate the comparison, shark numbers were linked to effort (h). Sizes above 120 cm TL are essentially rep- resented by the assessment in BF3 spot (North Avon Islet) for which densities and sizes were far above the rest of the Bampton and Chesterfield reefs.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2016View details →

Figure 2 in Possible collapse of reef shark populations in remote coral reef ecosystems in the Coral Sea (Western Pacific)

Figure 2. - Number of grey reef shark (C. amblyrhynchos) per size classes caught in Moorea Island (French Polynesia) and Chesterfield Islands reefs (New Caledonia), respectively, with similar techniques and fishing effort (25 h × 1 operator). The size difference was assessed as highly significantly (P <0.001), and greater in Moorea than in the Chesterfield, by a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test.