Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Herpetofauna of Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center, a hotspot Atlantic Forest fragment in Pernambuco, north-eastern Brazil

Fig. 2. Anuran species found in the Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center Atlantic Forest fragment. (A) Phyllodytes gyrinaethes (Peixoto, Caramaschi, and Freire, 2003); (B) Phyllodytes edelmoi (Peixoto, Caramaschi, and Freire, 2003); (C) Phyllodytes luteolus (Wied-Neuwied, 1824); (D) Pristimantis ramagii (Boulenger, 1888); (E) Pithecopus nordestinus (Caramaschi, 2006); (F) Dendropsophus elegans (Wied-Neuwied, 1824); (G) Scinax cretatus (Nunes and Pombal, 2011); (H) Scinax eurydice (Bokermann, 1968); (I) Scinax x-signatus (Spix, 1824); (J) Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885); (K) Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799); (L) Stereocyclops incrassatus (Cope, 1870). Photos: M.A. Freitas.

Fig. 1 in Herpetofauna of Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center, a hotspot Atlantic Forest fragment in Pernambuco, north-eastern Brazil

Fig. 1. Atlantic Forest fragment of Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center (CIMNIC), Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil. A few other Ecological Reserves located in Pernambuco State, as well as other states in Northeastern Brazil, are also shown.

Fig. 6 in Herpetofauna of Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center, a hotspot Atlantic Forest fragment in Pernambuco, north-eastern Brazil

Fig. 6. Snakes species found in the Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center Atlantic Forest fragment. (A) Boa constrictor (Linneaus, 1758); (B) Epicrates cenchria (Linneaus, 1758); (C) Chironius flavolineatus (Jan, 1863); (D) Dendrophidion atlantica (Freire, Caramaschi, and Gonçalves, 2010); (E) Spilotes pullatus (Linneaus, 1758); (F) Tantilla melanocephala (Linneaus, 1758); (G) Erythrolamprus almadensis (Wagler, 1824); (H) Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied-Neuwied, 1825); (I) Erythrolamprus viridis (Wagler, 1824); (J) Helicops angulatus (Linneaus, 1758); (K) Oxybelis aeneus (Wagler, 1824); (L) Oxyrhopus petolarius (Linneaus, 1758); (M) Oxyrhopus trigeminus (Duméril, Bibron, and Dumeril, 1854); (N) Philodryas olferssi (Lichtenstein, 1823); (O) Philodryas patagoniensis (Girard, 1825); (P) Sibynomorphus neuwiedi (Ihering, 1911); (Q) Siphlophis compressus (Daundin, 1803); (R) Xenodon merremii (Wagler, 1824); (S) Thamnodynastes pallidus (Linneaus, 1758); (T) Micrurus leminiscatus (Linneaus, 1758); (U) Micrurus ibiboboca (Merrem, 1820); (V) Amerotyphlops brongersmianus (Vanzolini, 1976); (W) Crotalus durissus (Linneaus, 1758); (X) Lachesis muta (Linneaus, 1766). Photos: M.A. Freitas.

Fig. 5 in Herpetofauna of Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center, a hotspot Atlantic Forest fragment in Pernambuco, north-eastern Brazil

Fig. 5. Lacertid species found in the Marechal Newton Cavalcanti Instruction Center Atlantic Forest fragment. (A) Enyalius catenatus (Wied-Neuwied, 1821); (B) Gymnodactylus aff. darwinii (Gray, 1845); (C) Norops fuscoauratus (D'Orbigny, 1837); (D) Tropidurus hispidus (Spix, 1825); (E) Tropidurus semitaeniatus (Spix, 1825); (F) Ameiva ameiva (Linneaus, 1758); (G) Ameivula ocellifera (Spix, 1825); (H) Salvator merianae (Dumeril and Bíbron, 1839); (I) Kentropyx calcarata (Spix, 1825); (J) Cercosaura ocellata (Weagler, 1830); (K) Hemidactylus mabouia (Moreau de Jonnés, 1818); (L) Iguana iguana (Linneaus, 1758); (M) Coleodactylus meridionalis (Boulenger, 1888); (N) Polychrus marmoratus (Linneaus, 1758); (O) Strobilurus torquatus (Wiegmann, 1834). Photos: M.A. Freitas.

Fig. 4 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 4. Dendrogram from the cluster analysis of the similarity of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil (PP, Pine Plantation; RF, Riparian Forest; AP, Araucaria Plantation; NR, Natural Regeneration forest; HA, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 3 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 3. True diversity values (TD), order q = 1, of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil. Equal letters indicate overlap of the 95% confidence intervals (PP, Pine Plantation; RF, Riparian Forest; AP, Araucaria Plantation; NR, Natural Regeneration forest; HA, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 5 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 5. Diagram of ordering of species of small mammals and environmental variables in the 24 small forest fragments in southeastern Brazil, produced by canonical correspondence analysis. The Acronyms represent "uc" to understory closure, "co" to canopy openness, "ep" to epiphytism, "lia" to lianas, "ft" to cattle, "cs" to creeks and streams, "we" to wetlands, "se" to soil exposure, "ro" to rocky outcrop, "lit" to litter, "ab" to arthropod biomass, "vr" to vegetal richness, "va" to vegetal abudance, and "ath" to average tree height.

Fig. 2 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 2. Rarefaction curves of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil, with a 95% confidence interval (A, Pine Plantation; B, Riparian Forest; C, Araucaria Plantation; D, Natural Regeneration forest; E, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013, at Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil (A, Pine Plantation; B, Riparian Forest; C, Araucaria Plantation; D, Natural Regeneration forest; E, High Altitude forest). Original distribution of Atlantic Forest biome (light gray) and Araucaria forest (dark gray).

Fig. 1 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the forest communities studied in 24 forest fragments located in southeastern Brazil. A description of individual forest fragments can be found in Supplementary Material Tab. A1.

Fig. 4 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 4. Beta (β) diversity values for small mammals related to nesting (βsne), turnover (βsim) and general dissimilarity (βsor) in the 24 small forest fragments located in southeastern Brazil. The figures on the right represent the final percentage for each index.

Fig. 2 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 2. Species accumulation curves to 24 fragments together for small mammals located in southeastern Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Occurrence and infestation rates of Streblidae (Diptera, Hippoboscoidea) on bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) in a semideciduous seasonal forest fragment in western Paraná, Brazil

Fig. 1. MonthlY average precipitation and temperature in Palotina, PR, Brazil, from 1997 to 2016. Source: SIMEPAR, 2018.

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in The phyllostomid bat (Mammalia, Chiroptera) assemblage in a fragmented landscape in Midwestern Brazil

Fig. 2. Similarity between the sampling points of the three landscape formations indicated by the NMDS method (circle, large fragment; sQuare, riparian forest; cross, small fragments).

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in The phyllostomid bat (Mammalia, Chiroptera) assemblage in a fragmented landscape in Midwestern Brazil

Fig. 1. Sampling points at Fazenda Dona Amélia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (circles, points in the large fragment; stars, points in the riparian forest; triangles, points in the small fragments).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Figs 2, 3 in Susceptibility of targets to the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus are proportional to their abundance in Atlantic Forest fragments?

Figs 2, 3. Two records of the approach of Desmodus rotundus (É. Geoffroy, 1810): 2, a bat landing on a trunk near a deer (Mazama americana); 3, a bat on the ground very close to a tapir (Tapirus terrestris).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Susceptibility of targets to the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus are proportional to their abundance in Atlantic Forest fragments?

Fig. 1. Study area located in the municipalities of ItajÁ and Aporé, state of GoiÁs, BraZil. Black dots represent the sites where the camera traps were set up.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Activity patterns of frugivorous phyllostomid bats in an urban fragment in southwest Amazonia, Brazil

Fig. 3. Number of captures of the four most abundant species, according to the rainfall in the ParQue Zoobotânico, Rio Branco, state of Acre, northern Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Activity patterns of frugivorous phyllostomid bats in an urban fragment in southwest Amazonia, Brazil

Fig. 2. Number of captures of the four most abundant species throughout the night period, according to hours after sunset, in the ParQue Zoobotânico, Rio Branco, state of Acre, northern Brazil.