Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10,812
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10,812 results for “novel”
Figure 4 in Identification and partial characterization of a novel serpin from Eudiplozoon nipponicum (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea)
Figure 4. The inhibitory effect of rEnSerp1 on selected SPs. (A) trypsin; (B) factor Xa; (C) plasmin; (D) plasma kallikrein. Results of assays with a bacterial lysate instead of rEnSerp1: (E) factor Xa and F, trypsin. Data are expressed as a mean value ± standard deviation.
Figure 2. A in Identification and partial characterization of a novel serpin from Eudiplozoon nipponicum (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea)
Figure 2. A phylogram of platyhelminth serpin homologs, Bayesian inference analysis. Values along the branches indicate posterior probabilities and bootstrap values resulting from Bayesian inference and Maximum likelihood analyses, respectively. Proportional lengths of the branches correspond to the expected number of amino acid substitutions per site. The resulting tree is mid-point rooted in order to visualise the clustering of representative subfamilies. Newly obtained Eudiplozoon nipponicum serpin homolog (EnSerp1) is labelled red.
Figure 2 in Exploring sterile pollen technique as a novel tool for management of Palmer amaranth (Amoronthus polmeri)
Figure 2. Effect of different irradiation doses on seed set of Amoronthus polmeri inflorescences in 2020 with back-transformed means and SE. Abbreviations: I, irradiated pollen; I+NI, irradiated pollen followed by hand pollination with non-irradiated pollen; NI+I, non-irradiated pollen followed by hand pollination with irradiated pollen; NI, non-irradiated pollen; Open, open pollination. LSD0.05 is the least-square distance for significance level 0.05; error bars indicate SE; shaded areas for Open and NI are mean ± SE.
Figure 3 in Exploring sterile pollen technique as a novel tool for management of Palmer amaranth (Amoronthus polmeri)
Figure 3. Effect of different irradiation doses on seed set of Amoronthus polmeri inflorescences in 2021 with mean and SE. Abbreviations: I, irradiated pollen; I+NI, irradiated pollen followed by hand pollination with non-irradiated pollen; NI+I, non-irradiated pollen followed by hand pollination with irradiated pollen; I+O,Irradiated pollen followed by open pollination; O+I, open pollination followed by hand pollination with irradiated pollen; O+I+O,open pollination followed by hand pollination with irradiated pollen followed by open pollination. LSD0.05 is the least-square distance for significance level 0.05; error bars indicate SE. (The mean and SE are 0.3935% and 0.0220% for open pollination and 0.3790% and 0.0216% for non-irradiated pollen treatment, respectively.)
Figure 1 in Exploring sterile pollen technique as a novel tool for management of Palmer amaranth (Amoronthus polmeri)
Figure 1. Viability of pollen grains stained with 2,5-diphenyl monotetrazolium bromide (MTT) showing differing intensities (A). Effect of irradiation dosages of gamma rays on pollen viability as quantified by mean gray value percentages from 100 pollen grains (B). Error bars indicate SE.
Figs 4A–F in Morphology of Two Novel Species of Chaenea (Ciliophora, Litostomatea): Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and C. sinica spec. nov.
Figs 4A–F. Chaenea sinica spec. nov. in vivo (A, C) and after protargol staining (B, D–F). A – typical extended individual; B – detail of anterior part of dorsal ciliary pattern; C – contracted individual; D, E – overview of ciliary pattern of ventral (D) and dorsal (E) side; F – distribution of macronuclei, extrusomes, and nematodesmata. B1–4 – dorsal brush rows 1–4, CK – circumoral kinety, CV – contractile vacuole, E – extrusome, Ma – macronuclei, N – nematodesmata, SK – somatic kinety. Scales bars: 50 µm.
Figs 3A–M in Morphology of Two Novel Species of Chaenea (Ciliophora, Litostomatea): Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and C. sinica spec. nov.
Figs 3A–M. Morphology of some closely-related congeners of Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and Chaenea sinica spec. nov. A–D – C. teres (from Petz et al., 1995), general view of living cell (A), overview of ciliary pattern (B), detail of ciliary pattern in anterior body end (C), surface view showing cortical granulation (D); E – C. simulans (from Kahl, 1930); F – C. robusta (from Kahl, 1930) G, H – Chaenea sp. (from Petz et al., 1995), detail of ciliary pattern in anterior body (G), overview of ciliary pattern (H); I–K – C. stricta (from Foissner, 1984), detail of ciliary pattern in anterior body (I), general view (J), overview of ciliary pattern (K); L, M – C. vorax (from Song and Packroff, 1997), general view (L), overview of ciliary pattern (M). B – dorsal brush, B1–4 – dorsal brush rows 1–4, CG – cortical granules, CK – circumoral kinety, CV – contractile vacuole, E – extrusomes, Ma – macronuclei, OB – oral bulge, SK – somatic kinety. Scale bars: 100 µm (A, H, L), 50 µm (B, J, K, M), 150 µm (E, F).
Figs 5A–N in Morphology of Two Novel Species of Chaenea (Ciliophora, Litostomatea): Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and C. sinica spec. nov.
Figs 5A–N. Chaenea sinica spec. nov. in vivo (A–G) and after protargol impregnation (H–N). A, B – typical individuals; C–E – contracted and twisted cells; F, G – rod-shaped extrusomes attached to oral bulge (F) and scattered in cytoplasm (G); H–J – ciliary pattern of anterior body end, showing circumoral kinety, dorsal brush rows 1–4, and nematodesmata; K – middle part of body, showing somatic kineties; L – anterior body end, arrowheads denote the extruded extrusomes outside the oral bulge; M – anterior body end, arrowhead marks cilia of the dorsal brush; N – many scattered macronuclear nodules throughout cytoplasm (arrowheads). B1–4 – dorsal brush rows 1–4, CK – circumoral kinety, CV – contractile vacuole, E – extrusome, N – nematodesmata, SK – somatic kinety. Scales bars: 100 µm.
Figs 1A–G in Morphology of Two Novel Species of Chaenea (Ciliophora, Litostomatea): Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and C. sinica spec. nov.
Figs 1A–G. Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. in vivo (A, B, D) and after staining with protargol (C, E–G). A – a naturally extended individual, noting rod-shaped extrusomes scattered in cell; B – anterior body end to show oral bulge and the extrusomes attached to it; C – ciliary pattern of anterior end marking circumoral kinety and dorsal brush rows 1–4; D – a contracted individual, noting oral bulge, food vacuole and contractile vacuole; E, F – ciliary pattern of ventral (E) and dorsal (F) side of holotype specimen, indicating the circumoral kinety, dorsal brush rows 1–4, and somatic kineties; G – distribution of macronuclei and extrusomes. B1–4 – dorsal brush rows 1–4, CK – circumoral kinety, CV – contractile vacuole, E – extrusomes, FV – food vacuole, Ma – macronuclei, OB – oral bulge, SK – somatic kinety. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figs 2A–P in Morphology of Two Novel Species of Chaenea (Ciliophora, Litostomatea): Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. and C. sinica spec. nov.
Figs 2A–P. Chaenea paucistriata spec. nov. in vivo (A–K) and after protargol impregnation (L–P). A–C – different body shapes; D – anterior body end to show the oral bulge; E, F – fine structure of anterior end to show rod-shaped extrusomes, arrowhead indicating cilia of the dorsal brush; G – dividing cell, showing cortical furrows along somatic kineties; H, I – typical individual, indicating contractile vacuole; J – cortical granules between somatic kineties (arrowheads); K – fine structure of the mid-body to show cytoplasmic granules and rodshaped extrusomes (arrowheads); L–N – ciliary pattern of anterior body end, showing circumoral kinety narrowly spaces oralized somatic monokinetids (arrowheads), and dorsal brush rows 1–4; O – ciliary pattern in mid-body and many scattered macronuclei; P – overview showing circumoral kinety and somatic kineties. B1–4 – dorsal brush rows 1–4, CK – circumoral kinety, CV – contractile vacuole, E – extrusomes, Ma – macronuclei, OB – oral bulge, SK – somatic kinety. Scale bars: 90 µm (A–C, H, I), 70 µm (P).
Fig. 7 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 7. Histograms depicting distribution of data for characters analyzed in this study. The black lines represent density curves that fit our data. Aperture height (ah), test diameter (td) and test top diameter (ttd) present a distribution similar to a bimodal distribution, while all the other characters show a nearly normal distribution. Characters tb2 and bw2 are not shown since they are equal to tb1 and bw1, respectively.
Fig. 2 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 2. Lateral view of six individuals of Arcella gandalfi. A and B – individuals with highest shell, top invagination is easily seen; C and D – individuals with intermediate shell height, top invagination easily seen; E and F – individuals with lowest shell height. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Fig. 1 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 1. Representation of measured characters. A – Arcella gandalfi in lateral view, showing aperture height (ah), test height (th), test top invagination (tti) and test top diameter (ttd). B – Arcella gandalfi in apertural view, showing the test diameter (td), aperture diameter (ad), test border 1–2 (tb1–2) and brim width 1–2 (bw1–2).
Fig. 6 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 6. Morphology of Arcella gandalfi under Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). A and B – lateral view showing the aperture region; C – shell detail showing elongated shape of the alveolar units on the conical extension of the shell. Scale bars: 20 µm.
Fig. 5 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 5. Representative images of an Arcella brasiliensis individual. A – apertural view, showing the distinct marginal ring (test brim); B – lateral view showing the rounded dome. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Fig. 4 in Morphological and Morphometric Description of a Novel Shelled Amoeba Arcella gandalfi sp.nov. (Amoebozoa:Arcellinida) fromBrazilianContinental Waters
Fig. 4. Apertural view of two individuals of Arcella gandalfi. A and B – distinct marginal ring (test brim) similar to Arcella brasiliensis easily seen. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Fig. 8 in Reproductive cycle of the Neotropical cichlid yellow peacock bass Cichla kelberi: A novel pattern of testicular development
Fig. 8. Testicular morphological characteristics of the Regression phase in C. kelberi. (a) Testicular proximal region, highlighting the big volume of melano-macrophage centers (mmc). (b) Gonad in restructuration with details to the Sertoli cells phagocytizing (Sp) the residual sperm (rSz), and the apoptotic cells (double arrow). (c) Transversal section along the testis in Regression. (d) Testicular periphery (dorsal region) highlighting the intense proliferation of primary spermatogonia in this region (Sg). primary spermatogonial cluster (dotted line); I - interstitial tissue; Sp - Sertoli cell in phagocytosis; Sc1 - primary spermatocysts; Sg1 - primary spermatogonia; Sg2 - secondary spermatogonia. H.E. stain.
Fig. 7 in Reproductive cycle of the Neotropical cichlid yellow peacock bass Cichla kelberi: A novel pattern of testicular development
Fig. 7. Testicular morphological characteristics of Late GE Development phase in C. kelberi. (a) Longitudinal section of the main testicular duct (dt). (b) Germinal epithelium discontinuity in the distal region of the testicular lobules (asterisk). (c) Spermatogenic cysts in different development phases, highlighting the spermatocytes cyst in metaphase (mt) of the first meiotic division. (d) Discontinuity of the germinal epithelium along the testicle. H.E. stain. Egd - discontinuous germinal epithelium; mmc - melano-macrophage centers; S - Sertoli cell; Sc1 - primary spermatocysts; Sg1 -primary spermatogonia; Sg2 - secondary spermatogonia cysts; St - spermatids cysts; Sz - sperm. H.E. stain.
Fig. 6 in Reproductive cycle of the Neotropical cichlid yellow peacock bass Cichla kelberi: A novel pattern of testicular development
Fig. 6. Testicular morphological characteristics of Mid GE Development phase in C. kelberi. (a and b) Testicular anastomosing region, highlighting the beginning of the germinal epithelium discontinuity (asterisk), in both the anastomosing region and lobules near the main testicular ducts. (c) Discontinuous germinal epithelium, with cysts in different development stages and lots of sperm (Sz) in the lobular lumen. (d) Peripheral lobular region (dorsal) highlighting the continuous germinal epithelium and clusters of primary spermatogonia (dotted line). ar - anastomosing region; dt - main testicular ducts; I - interstice; m - basal membrane; mt - metaphase; S - Sertoli cell; Sc1 - primary spermatocysts; Sg1 - primary spermatogonia; Sg2 - secondary spermatogonia; St - spermatids; ta - tunica albuginea; cytoplasmic extension (hollow arrow). H.E. stain.
Fig. 5 in Reproductive cycle of the Neotropical cichlid yellow peacock bass Cichla kelberi: A novel pattern of testicular development
Fig. 5. Testicular morphological characteristics of Early GE Development phase in C. kelberi. (a) Main testicular duct region (dt), highlighting the narrow light (arrow). (b) Testicular lobules with continuous germinal epithelium (Egc) and germ cells cysts in different phases of spermatogenesis. (c) Germ cells cysts in different phases of spermatogenesis. (d) Distal lobular region, highlighting the germ cells clusters (dotted line). Bv - blood vessels; S - Sertoli cell; Sc1 - primary spermatocysts; Sg1 - primary spermatogonia; Sg2 - secondary spermatogonia; St - spermatids; ta - tunica albuginea. H. E. stain.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.