Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Fig. 1 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps

Fig. 1. Location of Sinite Kamani Natural Park and schematic position of the camera traps through the park (black circles).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Fig. 3 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps

Fig. 3. Number of all pictures of Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) taken during 24h (expressed for one hour time interval) during seasons.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 2. Черношапочные сурки и их местообитания на хребте КоΑар: A — виΑ на ЦентраΛьный КоΑар и ΑоΛину р. СреΑний Сакукан; B — местообитание сурков поΑ переваΛом; C — местообитание сурков по берегам р. Того; D — местообитание сурков на вершине гребня, каΑр с фотоΛовушки; E — сурки; F — черношапочный сурок обΛизывает пΛасты каменного угΛя, каΑр из виΑеосъемки Fig. 2. Black-capped marmots and their habitats on the Kodar Ridge: A — view of the Central Kodar and the valley of the Middle Sakukan River; B — habitat of marmots under the mountain pass; C — habitat of marmots along the banks of the Togo River; D — marmot habitat at the top of the mountain ridge, camera trap frame; E — marmots; F — the black-capped marmot licks coal, freeze frame from video in On the ecology of the Doppelmayer`s Black-capped marmot (Marmota camtschatica doppelmayeri Birula, 1922): Kodar Mountain Ridge, Transbaikalia, Russia

Рис. 2. Черношапочные сурки и их местообитания на хребте КоΑар: A — виΑ на ЦентраΛьный КоΑар и ΑоΛину р. СреΑний Сакукан; B — местообитание сурков поΑ переваΛом; C — местообитание сурков по берегам р. Того; D — местообитание сурков на вершине гребня, каΑр с фотоΛовушки; E — сурки; F — черношапочный сурок обΛизывает пΛасты каменного угΛя, каΑр из виΑеосъемки Fig. 2. Black-capped marmots and their habitats on the Kodar Ridge: A — view of the Central Kodar and the valley of the Middle Sakukan River; B — habitat of marmots under the mountain pass; C — habitat of marmots along the banks of the Togo River; D — marmot habitat at the top of the mountain ridge, camera trap frame; E — marmots; F — the black-capped marmot licks coal, freeze frame from video

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 5. Пятнистый оΛень неоΑнократно снят фотоΛовушками в бассейнах рек Обор и Àурмин. 15.10.2020. 14.49. Фото А. С. БатаΛова Fig. 5. Sika deer repeatedly photographed by camera traps in the basins of the rivers Obor and Durmin; 15.10.2020. 14:49. Photo by A. S. Batalova in New data on the distribution of sika deer Cervus nippon Temminck, 1838 in the Lower Amur Region

Рис. 5. Пятнистый оΛень неоΑнократно снят фотоΛовушками в бассейнах рек Обор и Àурмин. 15.10.2020. 14.49. Фото А. С. БатаΛова Fig. 5. Sika deer repeatedly photographed by camera traps in the basins of the rivers Obor and Durmin; 15.10.2020. 14:49. Photo by A. S. Batalova

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in A new live trap for the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Emblemasoma erro (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)

Fig. 2. Details of trap construction showing a) the trap box and b) the speaker box. To reveal internal components, the front-facing, side plywood panels of the trap and speaker boxes are not illustrated. Also, for clarity, only 3 of the 5 wire screen cones of the trap box are illustrated.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in A new live trap for the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Emblemasoma erro (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)

Fig. 1. The complete live trap deployed in the field. Captured flies are visible in the holding jar assembly at the top of the trap box.

Fig. 2 in Placement density and longevity of pheromone traps for monitoring of the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 2. Relationship between the proportional number of Phyllocnistis citrella captures per trap and day of aged lures with respect to unaged lures, and the number of weeks that each lure was exposed to field environmental conditions during spring 2013, for the 2 commercial brands of lures a) ISCA and b) AlphaScents.

Fig. 1 in Placement density and longevity of pheromone traps for monitoring of the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. Mean number of Phyllocnistis citrella adult male captures per trap and day (± standard error) from Apr 2012 to Dec 2013, at the 3 trap densities tested: high: approximately 1 trap per 0.40 ha (1 acre), medium: approximately 1 trap per 1.21 ha (3 acres), and low: approximately 1 trap per 2.02 ha (5 acres).

Fig. 4 in Placement density and longevity of pheromone traps for monitoring of the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 4. Relationship between the proportional number of Phyllocnistis citrella captures per trap and day of aged lures with respect to unaged lures, and the number of weeks that each lure was exposed to field environmental conditions, with data combined for ISCA and AlphaScents during spring and ISCA during summer/fall 2013.

Fig. 3 in Placement density and longevity of pheromone traps for monitoring of the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 3. Relationship between the proportional number of Phyllocnistis citrella captures per trap and day of aged lures with respect to unaged lures, and the number of weeks that each lure was exposed to field environmental conditions during summer/fall 2013, for the 2 commercial brands of lures a) ISCA and b) AlphaScents.

Fig. 1 in Mixing male lures results in an effective multispecies bait for trapping Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) fruit flies

Fig. 1. Numbers of Bactrocera dorsalis male flies captured in traps baited with methyl eugenol (ME) alone or a mixture of ME and raspberry ketone (RK, a natural analogue of cue lure). Comparisons involved 3 mixtures in ME:RK ratios (wt:wt) of 95:5, 90:10, and 85:15. Symbols represent means (± SE) of 15 traps per lure type at 2 wk intervals over an 8 wk sampling period.

Fig. 6 in Inexpensive artisanal traps for mass trapping fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Haiti

Fig. 6. Predicted number of fruit flies caught relative to trap density in a mango orchard in Haiti during Jan 21 to Mar 3, 2015.

Fig. 2 in Inexpensive artisanal traps for mass trapping fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Haiti

Fig. 2. Total number of fruit flies caught for each trap model in a mango orchard in Haiti. Bars labeled with the same letter were not significantly different (ANOVA, Fisher LSD α = 0.05).

Fig. 1 in Inexpensive artisanal traps for mass trapping fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Haiti

Fig. 1. Trap models developed and used for evaluation of mass trapping efficacy for fruit flies in a mango orchard in Haiti. AT1, yellow-bottomed artisanal trap; AT2, clear artisanal trap; and MP, commercial McPhail trap.

Fig. 3 in Inexpensive artisanal traps for mass trapping fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Haiti

Fig. 3. Average proportion of female and male fruit flies caught per trap model in a mango orchard in Haiti. Bars labeled with identical letters were not significantly different afer comparisons among trap models (ANOVA, Fisher LSD α = 0.05).

Fig. 4 in Inexpensive artisanal traps for mass trapping fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Haiti

Fig. 4. Total number of fruit flies caught at 24 McPhail per ha (MP/ha) and 36 clear artisanal trap per ha (AT2/ha) in a mango orchard in Haiti. Bars labeled with the same letters were not significantly different (Binomial test for equal proportion, α = 0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Food attractants to increase pheromone-baited trap performance for Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) in mezcal maguey

Fig. 1. Mean number of Scyphophorus acupunctatus weevils captured per trap biweekly, with various food attractants. Means were calculated from data of 5 biweekly samples. Treatments with similar letters are not significantly different (Tukey, α = 0.05). Error bars indicate SE.

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of mass trapping and bait stations to control Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) fruit flies in mango orchards of Chiapas, Mexico

Fig. 1. Devices used as treatments during field evaluations: a) 600 mL polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle with three 1 × 1 cm holes in the upper third, baited with 50 mL of hydrolyzed protein; b) 600 mL PET bottle with two 3 × 3 cm windows in the upper middle, baited with 150 mL of GF-120 Naturalyte (80 ppm); c) MS® is a commercial bait station consisting of a 2-piece, bottle-shaped device, with a transparent upper piece with three 3 × 3 cm windows in the middle part and a yellow bottom, baited with Atrayente® (mix of 30% hydrolyzed protein, 10% propylene glycol, 5% malathion, and adjuvants; d) MS2® is the same MS® device as in 'c' but with the upper piece containing three 1-cm-diameter holes in the middle part, baited with 250 mL of Cera Trap®; e) wax matrix bait station is a waxed green box with slots baited with BioLure® synthetic attractant (ammonium acetate and putrescine); f) INIFAP trap is a 2 L, 14-cm-diameter, and 14 cm high cylindrical container, with three 1-cm-diameter holes at mid-height, baited with 250 mL of Cera Trap®.

Fig. 4 in Evaluation of mass trapping and bait stations to control Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) fruit flies in mango orchards of Chiapas, Mexico

Fig. 4. Recapture of sterile Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua in Multilure® traps in different treatments. For each species, trap capture percentages topped by the same letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Evaluation of mass trapping and bait stations to control Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) fruit flies in mango orchards of Chiapas, Mexico

Fig. 2. Recapture percentages of sterile Anastrepha ludens (top) and sterile Anastrepha obliqua (bottom) in Multilure® traps located in plots with PET bottle mass trapping devices, ground-sprayed with GF-120 Naturalyte, or untreated (control) in a mango orchard. For each season, trap capture percentages topped by the same letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).