Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2006View details →

Fig. 56. Part 2 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 56. Part 2 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Heleophrynidae and basal

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2006View details →

Fig. 37 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 37. Consensus of two equally parsimonious trees from Marmayou et al. (2000) of

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2006View details →

Fig. 4 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 4. Relationships of salamanders suggested by Larson and Dimmick (1993). Families

restrictedcc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Individual encounters with neighbors are disproportionate between tree species and through life stages in a temperate mixed forest

<p>Here is data for the paper "Individual encounters with neighbors are disproportionate between tree species and through life stages in a temperate mixed forest" by Chinatsu Homma et al.</p> <p>Metadata for each ordered data is provided in “Readme.pdf”;</p> <ul> <li>01Seedlings.csv</li> <li>02Saplings2x2.csv</li> <li>02SaplingsFloodPlain.csv</li> <li>03Poles.csv</li> <li>04Adults.csv</li> <li>spCode.csv: Correspondence table between species name and species code.</li> <li>universal_color.csv: Colour code for drawing figures.</li> </ul>

ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Research on the Application of Decision Tree in Child Life

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07325890. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

dryad24/100

Data from: Membrane proteins are dramatically less conserved than water-soluble proteins across the tree of life

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2017View details →

dryad24/100

Data from: The tree of life and a new classification of bony fishes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2013View details →

geo20/100

3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type [RNA-Seq]

GEO Series GSE163640. Homo sapiens. 9 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.

openGEO-OpenApr 2021View details →

Fig. 71 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 71. Generic changes suggested for ranid taxa that we studied. This is not exhaustive and the Systematic Comments under Ranidae in ''A Taxonomy of Living Amphibians'' should be consulted for additional taxonomic changes.

Fig. 69 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 69. Comparison of our bufonid parsimony results, via terminals held in common (see fig. 50, 60) with those of Pauly et al. (2004) (fig. 68). Taxa whose relative placement differs substantially between the two studies are in boldface.

Fig. 57 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 57. Fate of former Leptodactylidae (sensu lato) on our general tree (fig. 50 [insert]). Imbedded nonleptodactylid taxa are in bold.

Fig. 38 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 38. Neighborjoining tree of ranoid exemplars of Kosuch et al. (2001), which ''agreed well'' with the consensus of four equally parsimonious trees (ci 5 0.51). Underlying data were 572 bp of aligned 16S mtDNA sequences of which 221 are parsimonyinformative. Alignment was done manually using Sequencher (Applied Biosystems). Indels were treated as missing data. Taxon assignments on the right reflect the taxonomy as it existed at the time.

Fig. 46 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 46. Maximumlikelihood tree of Matsui et al. (2005) for East Asian ranids, based on mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequences (total of 1,283 bp). Sequence alignment was done under ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997) with cost functions not disclosed and subsequently adjusted manually, guided by secondary structure models as suggested by Kjer (1995). Modeltest 3.06 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) was used to select nucleotide evolutionary model (GTR) assumed for analysis. Fejervarya and Buergeria were used to root the tree.

Fig. 62. Part 7 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 62. Part 7 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Hemisotidae, Hyperoliidae, and Arthroleptidae.

Fig. 59. Part 4 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 59. Part 4 of anurans from the general tree (fig. 50 [insert]): Centrolenidae, Leptodactylidae, Ceratophryidae, and Cycloramphidae.

Fig. 28 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 28. Maximumlikelihood tree of hyperoliid, arthroleptid, and astylosternid frogs provided by Vences et al. (2003c). A, Maximumlikelihood analysis of 12S rRNA molecule (187 informative sites) analyzed under a GTR substitution model (cost functions reported) suggested by Modeltest (Posada and Crandall, 1998). Initial alignments under Clustal software, costs not disclosed, and subsequently adjusted manually. Highly variable regions and gaps were excluded as evidence. B, Maximumlikelihood trees based on 138 informative sites of 16S rRNA molecule under a GTR substitution model (cost functions reported) for hyperoliids, arthroleptids, and astylosternids. Initial alignments were made under Clustal, costs not disclosed, and subsequently adjusted manually. Highly variable regions and gaps sites were excluded as evidence.

Fig. 66. A in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 66. A simplied tree of our results (fig. 50) tree showing families. Numbers on branches allow branch lengths, Bremer, and jackknife values, as well as molecular synapomorphies to be identified in appendices 4 and 5. See table 5 for taxon names associated with internal numbered branches and figure