Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 14 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 14. Linguimaera tias sp. nov., male, female (Victoria, Port Phillip Bay). Gn1, 2 male 13 mm, Gn2 male 16 mm, Gn1, 2 female in scale x = 1 mm; Gn2´male 13 mm, Gn2´male 16 mm, Gn1´female, Gn2´female in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 13 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 13. Linguimaera tias sp. nov., male (Victoria, Port Phillip Bay). Hd scale x = 1 mm; mouthparts UL; Mx1, 2; Md; Mxp; LL in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 12 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 12. Linguimaera leo sp. nov., male, female (Victoria, Port Phillip Bay). P3–7 female, P7´, P7 hyperadult male, U1 in scale x = 1 mm; Ep3, U3 male, female, P7´´ male, T male, female in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 10 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 10. Linguimaera leo sp. nov., male, female (Victoria, Port Phillip Bay). Gn1 female in scale x = 1 mm, all other in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 7 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 7. Linguimaera garitima sp. nov. (Tasmania). Gn2 male large, Gn2 male small; U1, U3 male, P7´female 8.5 mm in scale = 0.5 mm; Gn2 female, P5–7 female in scale = 1.25 mm.

Figure 6 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 6. Linguimaera garitima sp. nov. (Tasmania). Mx1, 2; Md, LL, T´ in scale = 0.25 mm; P3, 4, 6 in scale = 1.25 mm; Gn2 small male, U3, T in scale = 0.5 mm.

Figure 2 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 2. Linguimaera pirloti sp. nov., male, female (Sri Lanka). Gn2 female, Us, U3 in scale x = 0.5 mm; Gn 1,2 male in scale x = 0.25 mm; P7 in scale y = 1 mm; Md, Mx2 in scale x = 0.2 mm.

Figure 1 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 1: Linguimaera sp. male (Adelaide, South Australia) SEM pictures. Above: head with thickened upper lip laterally; mandible with palp, maxillae; left half of upper lip ventrally. Second line: head with antennae, upper lip, mandible with palp, maxillae and maxilliped ventrolaterally. Below: head with first coxae and mouthparts from lateral and ventral; gnathopod 2 male.

Figure 5 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 5. Linguimaera garitima sp. nov. (Tasmania). Habitus in scale = 1 mm; Gn1, Gn2 male large and Ep3 in scale = 0.4 mm; Gn2´male large in scale = 0.2 mm.

Figure 11 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 11. Linguimaera leo sp. nov., male, female (Victoria, Port Phillip Bay). Gn1 male, Gn2s male, Gn2 l large male, female, Gn2 male hyperadult, Gn2 small female in scale x = 1 mm; Gn1´male, Gn2´small male, Gn2´large, Gn2´small female in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 4 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 4. Linguimaera bogombogo sp. nov, male, female (Eniwetok Atoll, Bogombogo Island, Micronesia). Gn2 female in scale = 0.25 mm; Gn2 male, Gn2´female in scale = 0.125 mm; P6, 7 in scale = 0.175.

Figure 8 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 8. Linguimaera kellissa sp. nov. (eastern Bass Strait). Gn1 male, Gn2s male, Gn2 1 male in scale x = 1 mm; Gn1´male, Gn2´female, Gn2 l´ male in scale y = 1 mm.

Figure 3 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 3. Linguimaera bogombogo sp. nov., male, female (Eniwetok Atoll, Bogombogo Island, Micronesia). Hd, Gn1, U3 in scale = 0.33 mm; Mdp, UL, T in scale = 0,175 mm.

Figure 9 in Linguimaera Pirlot, 1936 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae), a valid genus

Figure 9. Linguimaera kellissa sp. nov. (eastern Bass Strait). UL; Md, LL, T´ in scale = 0.5 mm; U3, Ep2, 3; T in scale = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Vision-Transformer, ViT, model validation dataset

The U.S. cotton industry is highly concerned with removing plastic contamination from cotton lint. A major source of this contamination is the plastic used to wrap cotton modules produced by John Deere round module harvesters. A machine-vision detection and removal system has been developed to address this problem, using low-cost color cameras to detect plastic in the cotton stream and remove it. However, the system requires a lot of calibration and is difficult for cotton gin workers to operate due to its reliance on custom machine-vision classifier running on low-cost ARM computers running Linux. This research aims to make the system more user-friendly by adding an auto-calibration feature that can track cotton colors and avoid plastic images, reducing the need for skilled personnel to operate the system and making it easier for the cotton ginning industry to adopt. This image dataset was created to validate several Vision-Transformer, ViT, AI models that in combination provides the key enabling technology for the auto-calibration code.

Figure 9 in Fregetta lineata (Peale, 1848) is a valid extant species endemic to New Caledonia

Figure 9. Comparison of underparts and underwing patterns of New Caledonian Storm Petrel Fregetta lineata (n = 30), off Nouméa, New Caledonia, January 2020 (top row) and New Zealand Storm Petrel F. maoriana (n = 43), Hauraki Gulf, North Island, New Zealand, November 2018 (bottom row). Variation is scored into four main types for each species, from the heaviest marked (score 1) to lightest marked (score 4). Underparts streaking Both species can show similar coverage of streaking on the white belly and a tendency for denser and / or thicker streaks on the flanks. Score 1 for F. lineata (23.3% of birds) is uniquely patterned, with continuous and dense rows of oval dapples, rather than straighter lines of F. maoriana. Score 2 for F. lineata (36.7%) is the most common and similar to the coverage and shape of streaking as the similarly common score 2 for F. maoriana (34.9%). Streaking on F. lineata tends to be denser and bolder giving the impression it is wider. The unstreaked belly area tends to be cleaner white in F. maoriana. Border of dark breast The border in F. lineata is positioned higher than in F. maoriana, towards the centre of the upper breast, creating a rounder and less straight border than F. maoriana. Underwing pattern In F. lineata, the dark leading edge to the inner wing involves lesser secondary-coverts. The longest of these have partially dark bases creating a characteristic ragged border, with strongly marked bases in 83.3%, limited dark bases in the remaining 16.7%. By contrast, the dark leading edge in F. maoriana invariably shows a clear-cut border on the coverts, only occasionally with a few dark spots in the longest lesser coverts, and never forming a continuous ragged border as in F. lineata. Usually, some greater secondary-coverts and most / all greater primary-coverts in F. lineata have broad dark centres. Thus, the white underwing panel of F. lineata is noticeably less extensive than in F. maoriana (Hadoram Shirihai, © Tubenoses Project)

Figure 3 in Fregetta lineata (Peale, 1848) is a valid extant species endemic to New Caledonia

Figure 3. Means of six biometrics (bill width, bill depth at gonys, and culmen, wing, tail and tarsus lengths) of small White-bellied Storm Petrels Fregetta grallaria (all taxa aggregated), New Caledonian Storm Petrel F. lineata, New Zealand Storm Petrel F. maoriana, the large Titan Storm Petrel F. [g.] titan, and Black-bellied Storm Petrel F. tropica (for methodology see main text).

Figure 8 in Fregetta lineata (Peale, 1848) is a valid extant species endemic to New Caledonia

Figure 8. Comparison of 'streaked' White-bellied Storm Petrel Fregetta g. grallaria with New Zealand Storm Petrel F. maoriana and New Caledonian Storm Petrel F. lineata. (A) White-bellied Storm Petrel, Lord Howe Island, Australia, April 2019 (David Newell, www.birdlifephotography.org.au). (B) White-bellied Storm Petrel, Lord Howe Island, February 2017 (Mark Lethlean, www.birdlifephotography.org.au). (C) White-bellied Storm Petrel, Lord Howe Island, date unknown (Jack Shick, www.lhirodenteradicationproject. org/plants-animals/birds). (D) New Zealand Storm Petrel, Hauraki Gulf, North Island, New Zealand, November 2018 (Hadoram Shirihai, © Tubenoses Project). (E) New Caledonian Storm Petrel, off Nouméa, New Caledonia, January 2020 (Hadoram Shirihai, © Tubenoses Project). (F) New Caledonian Storm Petrel, off Nouméa, New Caledonia, January 2020 (Hadoram Shirihai, © Tubenoses Project). Rarely, individuals of all populations of F. grallaria have limited fine streaking, for example (A) and (B), narrow and close to feather shafts, never in rows of oval dapples characteristic of F. lineata, for example (E) and (F), or forming straighter lines characteristic of F. maoriana (D). A few extreme examples of F. g. grallaria from Lord Howe possess broader flanks streaking, e.g. (C), but never covering the whole belly.

Figure 2 in Fregetta lineata (Peale, 1848) is a valid extant species endemic to New Caledonia

Figure 2. The five historic and one recently discovered museum specimens of New Caledonian Storm Petrel Fregetta lineata and New Zealand Storm Petrel F. maoriana. (A) F. lineata, collected 1839, perhaps 23–25 November, Samoa by T. R. Peale during the US Explorer Expedition, held at National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC (USNM 15713). (B) F. lineata, collected 15 September 1922, presumably at sea, off Ua Pou Island, Marquesas Islands by R. H. Beck during the Whitney South Seas Expedition, held at American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH 194110). (C) F. maoriana, collected January–March 1827 by Quoy & Gaimard (1830) during first voyage of the Astrolabe, held at Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris (MNHN C.G. 1829.254 (14393), C.G. 1829 (14372)). (D) F. maoriana, presented by George Carrick Steet of London in February 1895, possibly collected in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand (Bourne et al. 2004), held at the Natural History Museum, Tring (NHMUK 1895.2.11.1). (E) F. lineata (left) and Black-bellied Storm Petrel F. tropica (right), beach-cast, Stradbroke Island, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, held at Queensland Museum, Brisbane (respectively, QM 14391 collected July 1973; and QM 31216, collected 22 May 1999) (Vincent Bretagnolle, except D: Mark Adams, © Natural History Museum, London)

Figure 7 in Fregetta lineata (Peale, 1848) is a valid extant species endemic to New Caledonia

Figure 7. New Caledonian Storm Petrel Fregetta lineata, off Nouméa, New Caledonia, January 2020 (Hadoram Shirihai, © Tubenoses Project)