Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14,185
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14,185 results for “phylogenies”
Figure 5 in Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages
Figure 5. One of the eight MPCs obtained from analysis of the total data under implied weights. This cladogram includes one of each of the three sets of two conflicting topologies. The other three sets of conflicting topologies obtained in the analysis are shown in Figure 6. See text for details.
Figure 4 in Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages
Figure 4. Strict consensus of eight MPCs (Fit = 596.4) obtained from the analysis of combined adult and immature stages data under implied weights. Bremer support and relative Bremer support values of each clade are indicated above and below the branches, respectively. The clade comprising Ve. indica and Ve. pseudomediofaciata has zero Bremer support and should have been shown as collapsed.
Figure 1 in Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages
Figure 1. Strict consensus of 4537 MPCs of 871 steps (CI = 0.14, RI = 0.69) obtained from analysis of adult data under equal weights. Groups in polytomies in this and subsequent consensus trees (Figs 2, 3, 4, 7) are arranged in order of increasing size, such that single taxa are listed at the top of the tree and the largest groups at the bottom. No significance should be read into this aspect of the sequence.
Figure 1 in Phylogeny and species boundaries in the gobiid genus Gnatholepis (Teleostei: Perciformes)
Figure 1. Map of localities for all Gnatholepis specimens examined for this study. Sites from which samples used in DNA analysis were taken are indicated with arrows. Gnatholepis anjerensis (•); G. scapulostigma (-); G. davaoensis (Ɨ); G. knighti (Δ); G. thompsoni (Z); G. gymnocara (O); G. sp. (¥). Many other locality records for Gnatholepis exist, but only specimens for whom identity has been confirmed by examination of morphology and/or DNA sequence are included in this figure.
Figure 3 in Phylogeny and species boundaries in the gobiid genus Gnatholepis (Teleostei: Perciformes)
Figure 3. Left lateral views of A, Gnatholepis anjerensis (LACM 55960–4; 30.3 mm SL), B, G. knighti (LACM 55973.001; 26.7 mm SL), C, G. scapulostigma (LACM 55960–5; 34.4 mm SL). The meristic counts for these species overlap and there is a great deal of intra- and interspecific variation in colour pattern for most characters. The morphological character that distinguishes these species and accords with clades revealed in the DNA sequence analysis is the presence of a spot dorsal to the pectoral fin, with or without a pale centre (in G. scapulostigma and G. thompsoni), absence of such a spot (in G. anjerensis), or presence of a narrow dash-shaped mark dorsal to the pectoral fin (in G. knighti).
Figure 2 in Phylogeny and species boundaries in the gobiid genus Gnatholepis (Teleostei: Perciformes)
Figure 2. Strict consensus of most parsimonious trees obtained in cladistic analysis of DNA data; numbers at nodes are decay indices. Two large clades (I and II) are present, each of which contains smaller clades that are accorded specific status.
Figure 27 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 27. Australachalcus variabilis sp. nov. (male). Hypopygial appendages. A, aedeagus; B, hypandrium, ventral view; C, epandrial lobe; D, ventral process of epandrium; E, epandrial lobe (top) and surstylus (bottom); F, cercus.
Figure 26 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 26. Australachalcus variabilis sp. nov. (male). A, femur II; B, wing; C, antenna; D, hypopygium.
Figure 25 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 25. Australachalcus setosus sp. nov. (male). A, femur I; B, femur II; C, antenna; D, wing; E, hypopygium.
Figure 24 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 24. Australachalcus robustus sp. nov. (male). A, wing; B, hypopygium; C, antenna; D, coxa and femur I; E, femur II.
Figure 16 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 16. Australachalcus browni sp. nov. (male). A, wing; B, femur II; C, antenna; D, femur I; E, hypopygium.
Figure 21 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 21. Australachalcus longicornis (Van Duzee) (male). A, wing; B, antenna; C, coxa and femur I; D, femur III, posterior view.
Figure 12 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 12. Australachalcus acornis sp. nov. (male). A, femur I; B, femur II; C, antenna; D, wing; E, hypopygium.
Figure 13 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 13. Australachalcus albipalpus (Parent) (male, unless mentioned otherwise). A, wing; B, female antenna; C, antenna; D, hypopygium; E, epandrial setae at base of epandrial lobe.
Figure 5 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 5. Achalcus costaricensis sp. nov. (male, unless mentioned otherwise). A, wing; B, coxa and femur I; C, antenna; D, female antenna; E, palp; F, hypopygium.
Figure 1 in Systematic revision of Neotropical Achalcus and a related new genus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae, Achalcinae) with comments on their phylogeny, ecology and zoogeography
Figure 1. Achalcus flavicollis (Meigen) (male). Hypopygium. AE, aedeagus; CC, cercus; DEP, dorsal process of epandrium; EL, epandrial lobe; ES, epandrial setae; HP, hypandrium; PGO, postgonites; ST, surstylus; VEP, ventral process of epandrium.
Figure 10. A in The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis
Figure 10. A new phylogeny for the Hippopotamidae. Geographical distribution: anot Eastern African, but from Abu Dhabi, the Arab United Emirates, the Arabic Peninsula (see Gentry, 1999); bknown in Eastern Africa but also in Oubeidiyeh, Israel (see Faure, 1986) and maybe in Algeria (Geraads, 1980); cknown in Africa but also in continental Europe (see Mazza, 1995).
Figure 9 in The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis
Figure 9. Mandibular anatomy within the Hippopotamidae. This figure shows the new taxonomic divisions of the family Hippopotamidae and, for each discussed taxon, some of the mandibular characters that provided additional support to the clades identified in the parsimony analysis (boxes in this figure). These features include: the general shape of the mandible, with expansion of the canine processes and relative length of the symphysis (seen in the dorsal outlines); the shape of the symphysis sagittal cross section; the length of the premolar row relative to the length of the molar row. The figure shows the following features for the taxa listed under each genus name: Saotherium, very inclined symphysis with thin cross-section and poorly developed canine processes; Archaeopotamus, relatively long and shallow symphysis with poorly developed canine processes and longer premolar rows than in any other clade; Hexaprotodon, wide symphysis but with poorly differentiated canine processes, very robust symphysis in cross section; Choeropsis, very short symphysis globular in cross section and poorly developed canine processes; Hippopotamus and aff. Hippopotamus, short symphysis globular in crosssection (lacking a projected incisor alveolar process) and strong extension of the canine processes – the latter feature being not salient in the Afar species (aff. Hip. coryndoni, aff. Hip. afarensis) and aff. Hip. cf. protamphibius from Kanapoi.
Figure 8 in The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis
Figure 8. An example of convergence in the Hippopotamidae: orbit elevation. From bottom to top, right lateral views of the neuro-crania: KNM-WT 19633, Hippopotamus gorgops from the Nachukui Formation, West Turkana, Kenya, housed at the NMK, Nairobi; 36824, Hexaprotodon palaeindicus from the Narbada beds, Central India, housed at the NHM, London; KNM-ER 798, holotype of Hex. karumensis, from the Koobi Fora Formation, East Turkana, Kenya, housed at the NMK, Nairobi. The elevated orbit is related to an aquatic way of life (Mazin & Buffrénil, 2001), indicating a preferential position at the air/water interface. These three species belong to three different lineages and evolved from forms with much lower orbits.
Figure 5. Dental character states. A in The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis
Figure 5. Dental character states. A, upper canine cross section (from left to right: in Anthracokeryx ulnifer, in Hippopotamus amphibius, in Hexaprotodon bruneti, in Hex. harvardi). B, outline of the P1/alveolus (bottom: in Hex. protamphibius, top: in Hex. sivalensis). C, occlusal view of the P3/ (left: in Hex. bruneti, right: in Hex. protamphibius). D, occlusal view of the P4/ (left: in Hex. harvardi, right: both in Hex. protamphibius). E, occlusal view of the P/4 (left: in Hex. mingoz, right: in Hex. aethiopicus).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.