Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedJan 2020View details →

Figure 2 in Ecological investigations and diversity of amphibians in Lake Kalimpa'aı Lore Lindu National Parkı Central Sulawesi

Figure 2. (a) Limnonectes modestus; (b) Ingerophrynus celebensis; (c) Hylarana celebensis; (d) Polypedates iskandari; (e) Rhacophorus edentulus; (f) Rhacophorus monticola.

opennotspecifiedJan 2020View details →

Figure 1 in Ecological investigations and diversity of amphibians in Lake Kalimpa'aı Lore Lindu National Parkı Central Sulawesi

Figure 1. Map of the Lake Kalimpa'a Lore Lindu National Park (LLNP) in Sulawesi, showing the sampling sites and the distribution of each amphibian species.

FIGURE 4 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 4. Color pattern variation of Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. in live paratypes specimens. Photos not to scale.

FIGURE 1 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 1. Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. (holotype UFMG 16784; adult male, SVL 17.3 mm): (A) dorsal and (B) ventral views. Scale bar=5 mm.

FIGURE 9 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 9. Physalaemus rupestris (UFMG 13369; adult male): (A) dorsal and (B) ventral views. Scale bar=5 mm.

FIGURE 8 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 8. Advertisement call of (A, B) Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. and (C, D) P. rupestris. (A) Spectrogram (above) and oscillogram (below) of a single call composed of note A and B; (B) spectrogram of six calls in sequence. Observe that the second call of the call sequence, note A was released alone, without the note B. Recordings CBUFMG 749, paratype (Audio S1). (C) Spectrogram (above) and oscillogram (below) of a single call composed of note A and B; (D) oscillogram of 12 calls in sequence, nine composed of A + B notes released in sequence and three composed of note A emitted solely between A + B note calls. Recordings CBUFMG 754, topotype (Audio S2).

FIGURE 11 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 11. Geographic distribution of Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. and of the other species of the P. deimaticus species group. Triangles refers to species type localities. Abbreviations: MG=State of Minas Gerais, ES=State of Espírito Santo, RJ=State of Rio de Janeiro, SP=State of São Paulo.

FIGURE 2 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 2. Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. (holotype UFMG 16784; adult male): (A) dorsal and (B) lateral views of head, (C) ventral views of right hand and (D) right foot. Scale bar=2 mm.

FIGURE 10 in Amphibians from Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. VI: A New Species of the Physalemus deimaticus Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae)

FIGURE 10. Phylogenetic relationships of Physalaemus claptoni sp. nov. inferred from the H1 fragment matrix using maximum parsimony criterion. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (%). Only bootstrap values greater than 50% are shown.

FIGURE 1. Ilya S in Annotated list of amphibian and reptile taxa described by Ilya Sergeevich Darevsky (1924-2009)

FIGURE 1. Ilya S. Darevsky (1924–2009). Leningrad, 1979 (from the archive of Department of Herpetology ZISP).

FIGURE 3 in Quantifying vertebrate zoogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in the species composition of mammals, birds, reptiles and terrestrial amphibians

FIGURE 3. Phytogeographical subregions of Australia (Ebach et al. 2015), based on the analysis by González-Orozco et al. (2014b).

FIGURE 6 in Quantifying vertebrate zoogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in the species composition of mammals, birds, reptiles and terrestrial amphibians

FIGURE 6. The Bassian subregion as proposed by Main et al. (1958). Note that the Bassian includes the South-West Australia subregion.

FIGURE 2 in Quantifying vertebrate zoogeographical regions of Australia using geospatial turnover in the species composition of mammals, birds, reptiles and terrestrial amphibians

FIGURE 2. Map of Australia with the location of the 3 Clusters and their corresponding Subclusters (a-c) in relation to the regions.

opennotspecifiedApr 2022View details →

Figure 6 in Cranial skeletogenesis of one of the largest amphibians, Andrias japonicus, provides insight into ontogenetic adaptations for feeding in salamanders

Figure 6. Principal components analysis plot of skull characteristics of Andrias japonicus (pink), Hynobius nebulosus (blue), Pleurodeles waltl (green) and Ambystoma mexicanum (orange) along the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2). Diamonds represent larvae, squares juveniles, triangles subadults and circles adults. Changes in shape associated with the principal components are shown as cranial shapes representing the positive and negative extremes of each axis.

opennotspecifiedMar 2020View details →

FIGURE 25. A in Synopsis of the Amphibians of Equatorial Guinea based upon the Authors' Field Work and Spanish Natural History Collections

FIGURE 25. A. Ventral view of Wolterstorffina parvipalmata (surroundings of Moka, Bioko). Photo JW.; B. Wolterstorffina parvipalmata, same specimen as A (surroundings of Moka, Bioko). Photo JW.; C. Wolterstorffina parvipalmata (surroundings of Moka, Bioko). Photo PM.; D. Wolterstorffina parvipalmata, same specimen as C (surroundings of Moka, Bioko). Photo RB.; E–F. Arlequinus krebsi (surroundings of Pico Basilé, Bioko). Photos JW.

Fig. 71 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 71. Generic changes suggested for ranid taxa that we studied. This is not exhaustive and the Systematic Comments under Ranidae in ''A Taxonomy of Living Amphibians'' should be consulted for additional taxonomic changes.

Fig. 69 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 69. Comparison of our bufonid parsimony results, via terminals held in common (see fig. 50, 60) with those of Pauly et al. (2004) (fig. 68). Taxa whose relative placement differs substantially between the two studies are in boldface.

Fig. 57 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 57. Fate of former Leptodactylidae (sensu lato) on our general tree (fig. 50 [insert]). Imbedded nonleptodactylid taxa are in bold.

Fig. 38 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 38. Neighborjoining tree of ranoid exemplars of Kosuch et al. (2001), which ''agreed well'' with the consensus of four equally parsimonious trees (ci 5 0.51). Underlying data were 572 bp of aligned 16S mtDNA sequences of which 221 are parsimonyinformative. Alignment was done manually using Sequencher (Applied Biosystems). Indels were treated as missing data. Taxon assignments on the right reflect the taxonomy as it existed at the time.

Fig. 46 in The Amphibian Tree Of Life

Fig. 46. Maximumlikelihood tree of Matsui et al. (2005) for East Asian ranids, based on mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequences (total of 1,283 bp). Sequence alignment was done under ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997) with cost functions not disclosed and subsequently adjusted manually, guided by secondary structure models as suggested by Kjer (1995). Modeltest 3.06 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) was used to select nucleotide evolutionary model (GTR) assumed for analysis. Fejervarya and Buergeria were used to root the tree.